RE: [U2] Encrypt issue 8088

Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 3:12 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Encrypt issue 8088 Symeon, others, I tested every 128+ bit cipher available with Encrypt and here are the results: All the ciphers work with encoding but require the workaround (remove extra LF

Re: [U2] Encrypt issue 8088

Here is my standard crypt sub FUNCTION AD.CRYPT(Word,key,iv) * Function to crypt something i.e. a password * a2c limited, Oct2005 Crypt=Word Err='';result='';resLoc=1;salt='' algorithm=rc2-cbc Err=ENCRYPT(algorithm,2,Word,1,key,1,1,salt,iv,result,resLoc) IF NOT(Err) THEN

RE: [U2] Encrypt issue 8088

: Friday, August 25, 2006 1:06 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Encrypt issue 8088 Here is my standard crypt sub FUNCTION AD.CRYPT(Word,key,iv) * Function to crypt something i.e. a password * a2c limited, Oct2005 Crypt=Word Err='';result='';resLoc=1;salt='' algorithm

Re: [U2] Encrypt issue 8088

David A. Green wrote: Why do programmers use result[LEN(result),1]? Doesn't result[1] do the same thing but easier, quicker, and more readable? snip variable[1] to reference the last byte of variable is a relatively recent addition to Universe. Where relatively refers to the lifeline of the

RE: [U2] Encrypt issue 8088

, August 25, 2006 10:07 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Encrypt issue 8088 Why do programmers use result[LEN(result),1]? Doesn't result[1] do the same thing but easier, quicker, and more readable? Thanks, David A. Green DAG Consulting www.dagconsulting.com -Original Message

RE: [U2] Encrypt issue 8088

Breen Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 1:06 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Encrypt issue 8088 Here is my standard crypt sub FUNCTION AD.CRYPT(Word,key,iv) * Function to crypt something i.e. a password * a2c limited, Oct2005 Crypt=Word Err='';result='';resLoc=1;salt

[U2] Encrypt issue 8088

Hi, Can anyone share a code fragment for removing the extra Char(10) characters from the Encrypt function. I've studied the IBM articles (2) on U2 Encryption, and read the previous posts on this list. I've tried to remove the extra LF with less than sterling results. I can't find the char(10),

RE: [U2] Encrypt issue 8088

Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Baker Hughes Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:35 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Encrypt issue 8088 Hi, Can anyone share a code fragment for removing the extra Char(10) characters

RE: [U2] Encrypt issue 8088

:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of george r smith Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 11:22 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Encrypt issue 8088 Baker, I don't know if you are trying to do this via a Unibasic subroutine call or by using EXECUTE. I could not use the Unibasic because

RE: [U2] Encrypt issue 8088

Wouldn't change be a little easier? RESULT = CHANGE(RESULT,CHAR(10), '') hth, Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rajesh Menon Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 12:22 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Encrypt issue 8088

RE: [U2] Encrypt issue 8088

PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Baker Hughes Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:35 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Encrypt issue 8088 Hi, Can anyone share a code fragment for removing the extra Char(10) characters from the Encrypt function. I've