-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Anthony W.
Youngman
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 5:08 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
In message
Do you replicate every file on the server ?
--- On Wed, 12/16/09, John Hester jhes...@momtex.com wrote:
From: John Hester jhes...@momtex.com
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2009, 1:00 AM
Brad is right
and UV will be using the same replication engine.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of John Hester
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 11:01 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
Brad
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
Brad and John,
[ad]
Since, we work with both UD and UV we found replication is not the same.
We wrote a simple Java program that runs using UOJ and does the
replication to one or many sites. The software can even replicate from
Universe
In message
e6179e13392ec14aabcd5272c3aedd61112ce...@exchangesvr.momtex.com, John
Hester jhes...@momtex.com writes
There are also issues with UV dynamic files (don't know about UD)
because some of the file structure information is cached in memory and
not immediately flushed to disk.
This is
...@flash.net
To: 'U2 Users List' u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
Replication is QUITE useful at 7.1.20 and later I know -- we have lots of
people using it now!
Before this time, it had issues with large records, multiple
Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Address
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 8:33 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
We are using Double-Take to replicate
, December 09, 2009 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
We are using Double-Take to replicate.
--- On Wed, 12/9/09, BraDav broadri...@comcast.net wrote:
From: BraDav broadri...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Date
Double-Take replicates byte by byte.
--- On Tue, 12/15/09, BraDav broadri...@comcast.net wrote:
From: BraDav broadri...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2009, 10:56 PM
Someone needs to write an i
work files.
-John
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Address
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 8:12 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
Double-Take replicates byte by byte
own
takes time and is expensive. I think that using mirrored drives is
better!!! RFS???
Brad
- Original Message -
From: Kevin King precisonl...@gmail.com
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 12:22 PM
Subject: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
We are using Double-Take to replicate.
--- On Wed, 12/9/09, BraDav broadri...@comcast.net wrote:
From: BraDav broadri...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 8:33 AM
Kevin,
I would not use
Replication is QUITE useful at 7.1.20 and later I know -- we have lots of
people using it now!
Before this time, it had issues with large records, multiple overwrites one
the same key, etc. At 7.1.20 they also improved the monitoring.
Don't bother at less than 7.1.20 IMHO
David W.
-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Address
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 8:33 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
We are using Double-Take to replicate.
___
U2-Users
Awesome, great feedback my friends. Appreciate it very much.
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Is replication solid and functional in Unidata 6,1? Anyone using it with
roaring success?
-Kevin
http://www.PrecisOnline.com
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Kevin King
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 10:23 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] Unidata 6.1 Replication
Is replication solid and functional in Unidata 6,1? Anyone using it with
roaring
17 matches
Mail list logo
