Re: [U2] Why should we NOT upgrade to UV11.1.1 ?
Many thanks for the update. On 5/19/2011 1:59 AM, Bob Witney wrote: This is just for info really and following on from a thread of last week: We tried to upgrade to Universe 11.1.0 at the weekend. The first time that we tried we had an unreadable file in the download that Rocket supplied to our U2 Support company. This time the file was OK so that was a step forward but we had some problems with the install not being able to find a couple of items and not offering us the licence screen so we decided to roll it back. We did this by restoring the usr/ibm account. This however did not work and we got this error message when trying to start Universe. Couldn't start UVSMM. Please check /usr/ibm/uv/uvsmm.errlog" UniVerse is NOT started The error log contained this: #more /usr/ibm/uv/uvsmm.errlog Message[DBS0047] uvsmm.errlog: END which was not the most helpful and wouldn't Google at all ! SMM is something which comes in with release 11 so since we had restored to release 10.13 we were a tad surprised to see it. What had happened was that the upgrade (quite early on from the timestamp) had overwritten the Universe start up script uv.rc (ours resides in /etc) So we had to restore that and inittabuvbak (which had also been overwritten) After that we we OK. It took ages to work out that it was the uv.rc override that stopped us simply restoring the account and carrying on, I am hoping that this email means others won't have to spending their time on it. Bob Witney Explore! Nelson House 55 Victoria Road Farnborough Hants GU14 7PA b...@explore.co.uk Mob - 07973 451156 Direct - 01252 279489 Website - www.explore.co.uk ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] Why should we NOT upgrade to UV11.1.1 ?
Chuck, I think that 11.1.1 is a Windows release so this may, or may not be relevant. LIST.READU does not report a pid in 11.1.1. This is a "known" issue and is fixed in 11.1.3 I am told. How you go about finding any known issues, I have yet to establish. HTH Brett "Charles Stevenson" wrote in message news:<4dd479ef.9030...@gmail.com>... > UV11.1 has been available for AIX for 7 month; for Linux only 3.. > I don't know how widely used it is yet. > I have not seen a rash of complaints about 11.1. > > We are currently on 10.2.10 / Windows and contemplating migrating to Linux. > UV choices are: 10.3.9 & 11.1.1. > > We do not have a burning need for any new 11.1 functionality. The main > motivation would be to be able to put off future upgrades longer by > making this jump bigger. > > Linux choices are RedHat or SuSE. Your thoughts? > > Any warnings or endorsements re. UV version &/or Linux choices would be > much appreciated. > > Chuck Stevenson > Tolt Service Group > > ___ > U2-Users mailing list > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of GPM Development Ltd. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient ,you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. This e-mail was sent to you by GPM Development Ltd. We are incorporated under the laws of England and Wales (company no. 2292156 and VAT registration no. 523 5622 63). Our registered office is 6th Floor, AMP House, Croydon, Surrey CR0 2LX. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] Why should we NOT upgrade to UV11.1.1 ?
Maybe the 22nd then (its early for me here in the uk) :-) -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Mitchell, Stewart Sent: 19 May 2011 08:08 To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] Why should we NOT upgrade to UV11.1.1 ? What year would that be, must be USA time as 19th is a Thursday here in oz. Regards, Stewart Mitchell Business Systems Manager Symbion Pharmacy Services Tel: +61 8 8408 3685 Mob: +61 421 612 672 Email: stewart.mitch...@symbionpharmacy.com Building D, 75 Hardys Road I Underdale SA 5032 I Australia -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Bob Witney Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 4:30 PM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] Why should we NOT upgrade to UV11.1.1 ? I am upgrading here on Sunday 19th May, second attempt as one of the files provided via Rocket (unishared.load/ucisdk/UCI.a) was unreadable the first time we tried. I'll let the list know how it goes Bob -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Charles Stevenson Sent: 19 May 2011 03:01 To: U2 Users List Subject: [U2] Why should we NOT upgrade to UV11.1.1 ? UV11.1 has been available for AIX for 7 month; for Linux only 3.. I don't know how widely used it is yet. I have not seen a rash of complaints about 11.1. We are currently on 10.2.10 / Windows and contemplating migrating to Linux. UV choices are: 10.3.9 & 11.1.1. We do not have a burning need for any new 11.1 functionality. The main motivation would be to be able to put off future upgrades longer by making this jump bigger. Linux choices are RedHat or SuSE. Your thoughts? Any warnings or endorsements re. UV version &/or Linux choices would be much appreciated. Chuck Stevenson Tolt Service Group ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee, or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please notify the sender as soon as possible and delete the material from your computer. This message will be protected by copyright. If it has come to you in error, you must not take any action based on its contents nor must you copy or show the message to any person other than the intended recipient. _ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users This email and any attachments are confidential. They may contain legally privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy, use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete the original message and all copies. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus, data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised amendment. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee, or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please notify the sender as soon as possible and delete the material from your computer. This message will be protected by copyright. If it has come to you in error, you must not take any action based on its contents nor must you copy or show the message to any person other than the intended recipient. _ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Ema
Re: [U2] Why should we NOT upgrade to UV11.1.1 ?
What year would that be, must be USA time as 19th is a Thursday here in oz. Regards, Stewart Mitchell Business Systems Manager Symbion Pharmacy Services Tel: +61 8 8408 3685 Mob: +61 421 612 672 Email: stewart.mitch...@symbionpharmacy.com Building D, 75 Hardys Road I Underdale SA 5032 I Australia -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Bob Witney Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 4:30 PM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] Why should we NOT upgrade to UV11.1.1 ? I am upgrading here on Sunday 19th May, second attempt as one of the files provided via Rocket (unishared.load/ucisdk/UCI.a) was unreadable the first time we tried. I'll let the list know how it goes Bob -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Charles Stevenson Sent: 19 May 2011 03:01 To: U2 Users List Subject: [U2] Why should we NOT upgrade to UV11.1.1 ? UV11.1 has been available for AIX for 7 month; for Linux only 3.. I don't know how widely used it is yet. I have not seen a rash of complaints about 11.1. We are currently on 10.2.10 / Windows and contemplating migrating to Linux. UV choices are: 10.3.9 & 11.1.1. We do not have a burning need for any new 11.1 functionality. The main motivation would be to be able to put off future upgrades longer by making this jump bigger. Linux choices are RedHat or SuSE. Your thoughts? Any warnings or endorsements re. UV version &/or Linux choices would be much appreciated. Chuck Stevenson Tolt Service Group ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee, or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please notify the sender as soon as possible and delete the material from your computer. This message will be protected by copyright. If it has come to you in error, you must not take any action based on its contents nor must you copy or show the message to any person other than the intended recipient. _ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users This email and any attachments are confidential. They may contain legally privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy, use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete the original message and all copies. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus, data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised amendment. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] Why should we NOT upgrade to UV11.1.1 ?
I am upgrading here on Sunday 19th May, second attempt as one of the files provided via Rocket (unishared.load/ucisdk/UCI.a) was unreadable the first time we tried. I'll let the list know how it goes Bob -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Charles Stevenson Sent: 19 May 2011 03:01 To: U2 Users List Subject: [U2] Why should we NOT upgrade to UV11.1.1 ? UV11.1 has been available for AIX for 7 month; for Linux only 3.. I don't know how widely used it is yet. I have not seen a rash of complaints about 11.1. We are currently on 10.2.10 / Windows and contemplating migrating to Linux. UV choices are: 10.3.9 & 11.1.1. We do not have a burning need for any new 11.1 functionality. The main motivation would be to be able to put off future upgrades longer by making this jump bigger. Linux choices are RedHat or SuSE. Your thoughts? Any warnings or endorsements re. UV version &/or Linux choices would be much appreciated. Chuck Stevenson Tolt Service Group ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee, or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please notify the sender as soon as possible and delete the material from your computer. This message will be protected by copyright. If it has come to you in error, you must not take any action based on its contents nor must you copy or show the message to any person other than the intended recipient. _ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] Why should we NOT upgrade to UV11.1.1 ?
Hello Chuck. You might want to watch out for some issues with permissions being set incorrectly within a couple of the packages in 10.3.9. These cause an upgrade to fail. This has been addressed with U2 Support. This might not be a problem on a clean install rather than an upgrade. Perry - Original Message - From: Charles Stevenson [mailto:stevenson.c...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 10:01 PM To: U2 Users List Subject: [U2] Why should we NOT upgrade to UV11.1.1 ? UV11.1 has been available for AIX for 7 month; for Linux only 3.. I don't know how widely used it is yet. I have not seen a rash of complaints about 11.1. We are currently on 10.2.10 / Windows and contemplating migrating to Linux. UV choices are: 10.3.9 & 11.1.1. We do not have a burning need for any new 11.1 functionality. The main motivation would be to be able to put off future upgrades longer by making this jump bigger. Linux choices are RedHat or SuSE. Your thoughts? Any warnings or endorsements re. UV version &/or Linux choices would be much appreciated. Chuck Stevenson Tolt Service Group ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. ZirMed, Inc. has strict policies regarding the content of e-mail communications, specifically Protected Health Information, any communications containing such material will be returned to the originating party with such advisement noted. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
[U2] Why should we NOT upgrade to UV11.1.1 ?
UV11.1 has been available for AIX for 7 month; for Linux only 3.. I don't know how widely used it is yet. I have not seen a rash of complaints about 11.1. We are currently on 10.2.10 / Windows and contemplating migrating to Linux. UV choices are: 10.3.9 & 11.1.1. We do not have a burning need for any new 11.1 functionality. The main motivation would be to be able to put off future upgrades longer by making this jump bigger. Linux choices are RedHat or SuSE. Your thoughts? Any warnings or endorsements re. UV version &/or Linux choices would be much appreciated. Chuck Stevenson Tolt Service Group ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
