RE: [U2] UD: Named common

2005-12-28 Thread Keith W. Roberts
Original Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin King Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 12:56 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UD: Named common And if you're using an include to bring in the named common, what's the big deal

RE: [U2] UD: Named common

2005-12-28 Thread Bill Haskett
: Tuesday, December 27, 2005 12:56 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UD: Named common On Behalf Of Mark Johnson Perhaps the big difference is that while an older environment could have hundreds of spreadsheets or basic programs, a MV system probably won'd have but a few names

RE: [U2] UD: Named common

2005-12-28 Thread colin.alfke
Bill; Can't argue much about the 7 character limit on the common names. I'm not sure why it will compile in basictype 'u' and not 'p'. It just seems awfully dangerous to let it compile at all. We moved a lot of systems from Pick to UniData quite easily. ACCT_RESTORE would even read Pick tapes

RE: [U2] UD: Named common

2005-12-27 Thread Bill Haskett
much for your comments though. Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Wolverton Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 7:21 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UD: Named common At this moment and time

RE: [U2] UD: Named common

2005-12-27 Thread Womack, Adrian
). From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Bill Haskett Sent: Tue 27/12/2005 4:02 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] UD: Named common Dave: The reason I suspected a joke was because most of us have never lived with restricted variable name

RE: [U2] UD: Named common

2005-12-27 Thread David Wolverton
I probably should have been more clear -- that's why we rearranged and put our 'most unique' details at the front of the Named Common block -- but ulimately, we truncated all at 7 characters. DW -Original Message- In terms of readability/maintainability, the named common label can be

RE: [U2] UD: Named common

2005-12-27 Thread Bill Haskett
: [U2] UD: Named common I probably should have been more clear -- that's why we rearranged and put our 'most unique' details at the front of the Named Common block -- but ulimately, we truncated all at 7 characters. DW -Original Message- In terms of readability

RE: [U2] UD: Named common

2005-12-27 Thread Kevin King
On Behalf Of Mark Johnson Perhaps the big difference is that while an older environment could have hundreds of spreadsheets or basic programs, a MV system probably won'd have but a few names common entities. And if you're using an include to bring in the named common, what's the big deal

RE: [U2] UD: Named common

2005-12-26 Thread David Wolverton
At this moment and time, that would be true... But how many unique combinations of 7 characters can be created? 26 to the 7th power? (if we exclude numerics, anyway!) So far, 8 billion+ choices has been enough leeway for us to work within - But it is a hard limit -- we just truncated our Common

RE: [U2] UD: Named common

2005-12-26 Thread Wally Terhune
PROTECTED] cc stserver.u2ug.org Subject RE: [U2] UD: Named common 12/26/2005 08:21 PM Please