RE: [U2] many spindles - was Copying data between two UV servers

2004-08-03 Thread Chuck Mongiovi
It's not just U2 that likes to have multiple spindles. Any disk intensive processing activity will benefit by having the load split accross multiple disk subsystems. Agreed .. So why when we bought our new RS6000 about 1 year ago did the IBM guys try to sell us on a SMALLER number of LARGER

Re: [U2] many spindles - was Copying data between two UV servers

2004-08-03 Thread Scott Richardson
Subject: RE: [U2] many spindles - was Copying data between two UV servers It's true that it's getting tougher to justify 4 spindles that happen to be 36gig each for a database that is only 15gig in total size. But the speed difference that is achieved by splitting the data files between 2 sets

RE: [U2] many spindles - was Copying data between two UV servers

2004-08-03 Thread Thomas Derwin
Gotta look at the disk specs. All things may not be so equal. Disks are getting faster and smarter as they get larger. Latest disk speeds are 15,000 RPM vs. 8k or 10k. Faster SCSI buses, bigger caches and smarter access algorithms on both the drives and the controller cards boost I/O

RE: [U2] many spindles - was Copying data between two UV servers

2004-08-03 Thread Chuck Mongiovi
FWIW, our newer disk cabinet with faster SCSI controllers and higher disk RPM (but fewer spindles) blows away the older one that has 2-3 times the spindles. :-) but 36 GB drives that cost a lot less, and that are a lot faster, and last a lot longer It's actually hard to think that a shop