RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Burwell, Edward
dictionary look like? Thanks. Ed Burwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 973.361.5400 x1512 -Original Message- From: Bruce Lunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 12:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query What I have done in the past is concatenate the 2

Re: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Allen Egerton
From: Burwell, Edward [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 1:41 PM Subject: RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query R. Bruce, Could you give an example? I'm having trouble envisioning this. Let's say I have these keys in a list

RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Burwell, Edward
,@ID,3,):TRANS(ORDER.FILE.CAN,@ID,3,) 003: 004: NAME 005: 25L 006: S -Original Message- From: Allen Egerton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 1:47 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: Re: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query From: Burwell, Edward [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'U2

Re: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Allen Egerton
From: Burwell, Edward [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 2:00 PM Subject: RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query Does that work for you? It doesn't work for me. ORDER.FILE NAME. 114061 C.M.O.S. INC. *ASC* 114062

RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Bruce Lunt
Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'U2 Users Discussion List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:41:26 -0400 R. Bruce, Could you give an example? I'm having trouble envisioning this. Let's say I have these keys in a list: LOCAL.1 LOCAL.2

RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Burwell, Edward
] 973.361.5400 x1512 -Original Message- From: Bruce Lunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 3:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query In the dict of FILE.A create a dict called: NAME.LO that has: TRANS(LOCAL,ID,1,X):TRANS(OTHER,ID,1,X) What you

Re: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Bruce Lunt
to decide what do to do with that. Again, sorry for not testing out my solution before I offered it. Regards, Bruce From: Allen Egerton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query Date

Re: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread Mark Johnson
as well. Thanks. - Original Message - From: Bruce Lunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 10:11 PM Subject: Re: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query Open mouth, ... insert foot. Or whatever :) I'm sorry, I spoke too quickly. The ID's are needed in the primary

Re: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query

2004-04-30 Thread FFT2001
In a message dated 4/30/2004 10:11:05 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 001: I 002: TRANS(ORDER.FILE,@ID,3,):TRANS(ORDER.FILE.CAN,@ID,3,) 003: 004: NAME 005: 25L 006: S But could'nt you do something like IF TRANS(ORDER.FILE,@ID,3,) = THEN