Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-08 Thread Timothy Snyder
> I don't understand. What is this numeric variable. I got the reply '42'. To understand that response, you'll have to read The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy. Any attempt to explain it outside of that context would be futile. Tim Snyder IBM Data Management Solutions Consulting I/T Special

Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-07 Thread Ray Wurlod
You can't get at the DATUMs in which data values are stored. However you can affect them, or use them to you advantage. As one example, forcing a number that is currently stored as a character string to be a number will yield a small performance benefit when used to control a loop. For exampl

Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-06 Thread Mark Johnson
CTED]> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 8:16 PM Subject: Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0 > No, the "loosly typed" nature of MvBASIC is that you don't see this and can't control it. You can't specify that a variable is numeric and have the system barf when you try to d

Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-06 Thread FFT2001
No, the "loosly typed" nature of MvBASIC is that you don't see this and can't control it. You can't specify that a variable is numeric and have the system barf when you try to do A[1,3] on it. That's the curse and blessing of the environment. I was only correcting where you said that every

Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-06 Thread Mark Johnson
Does this opcode stuff come into play on the outside where we write code. Please provide an example. Thanks. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 7:47 PM Subject: Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0 > The

Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-06 Thread Mark Johnson
I don't understand. What is this numeric variable. I got the reply '42'. thanks. - Original Message - From: "gerry simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "U2 Users Discussion List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 4:01 PM Subj

Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-06 Thread FFT2001
There is a numeric type or "datum" as some people call it. Since we are talking MV here and not specifically one vendor. If you look at the opcode of an ADDS machine there is a code for LOADS (string) and also a seperate one for LOADN (numeric). This implies that there are in fact two seperate

Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-06 Thread gerry simpson
42 - Original Message - From: "Mark Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "U2 Users Discussion List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 3:29 PM Subject: Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0 > I'm all ears. What is this numeric variab

Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-06 Thread Mark Johnson
I'm all ears. What is this numeric variable. Thanks. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "U2 Users Discussion List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 2:34 PM Subject: Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0 > In a message dat

Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-06 Thread FFT2001
In a message dated 2/2/2004 9:06:43 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > It's been affirmed here and other places that MV considers everything as a text > variable (keep file handles and arrays out of this discussion) and its numerological > properties come > into play only whe

RE: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-02 Thread Stuart Boydell
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Mark Johnson ...  This brings up another aspect of the text/string situation: Consider this   A="00"[1,3]   ;*zeros for both lines B="00"[1,2]   PRINT (A=B)   and you would ex

Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-02 Thread Mark Johnson
l Message - From: Marco Manyevere To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2004 11:13 PM Subject: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0 Hi All,   What is the correct interpratation of   A = '001' B = A[1,3] + 0 PRINT B   On

RE: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-02 Thread Brian Leach
] On Behalf Of Marco ManyevereSent: 02 February 2004 04:14To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0 Hi All,   What is the correct interpratation of   A = '001' B = A[1,3] + 0 PRINT B   On UV 9.6 I get 0010 contrary to my expectation of 1. What is the logical explanatio

Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-01 Thread Tony Wood
From: Marco Manyevere To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 3:13 PM Subject: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0 Hi All,   What is the correct interpratation of   A = '001' B = A[1,3] + 0 PRINT B   On UV 9.6 I get 0010 contrary to my e

RE: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-01 Thread John Laughlin
, February 01, 2004 8:14 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0 Hi All,   What is the correct interpratation of   A = '001' B = A[1,3] + 0 PRINT B   On UV 9.6 I get 0010 contrary to my expectation of 1. What is the logical explanation of thi

RE: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-01 Thread Logan, David (SST - Adelaide)
eSent: Monday, 2 February 2004 2:44 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0 Hi All,   What is the correct interpratation of   A = '001' B = A[1,3] + 0 PRINT B   On UV 9.6 I get 0010 contrary to my expectation of 1. What is the logical ex

The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-01 Thread Marco Manyevere
Hi All,   What is the correct interpratation of   A = '001' B = A[1,3] + 0 PRINT B   On UV 9.6 I get 0010 contrary to my expectation of 1. What is the logical explanation of this. Does UV use '+' for string concatenation as well? Then why doesnt '123' + '456' result in '123456' (I get a runtim