Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-08 Thread Timothy Snyder
I don't understand. What is this numeric variable. I got the reply '42'. To understand that response, you'll have to read The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy. Any attempt to explain it outside of that context would be futile. Tim Snyder IBM Data Management Solutions Consulting I/T

Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-06 Thread FFT2001
In a message dated 2/2/2004 9:06:43 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It's been affirmed here and other places that MV considers everything as a text variable (keep file handles and arrays out of this discussion) and its numerological properties come into play only when

Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-06 Thread Mark Johnson
I'm all ears. What is this numeric variable. Thanks. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 2:34 PM Subject: Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0 In a message dated 2/2/2004 9:06:43 AM Eastern Standard

Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-06 Thread FFT2001
There is a numeric type or datum as some people call it. Since we are talking MV here and not specifically one vendor. If you look at the opcode of an ADDS machine there is a code for LOADS (string) and also a seperate one for LOADN (numeric). This implies that there are in fact two seperate

Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-06 Thread Mark Johnson
I don't understand. What is this numeric variable. I got the reply '42'. thanks. - Original Message - From: gerry simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: U2 Users Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 4:01 PM Subject: Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0 42

RE: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-02 Thread Brian Leach
February 2004 04:14To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0 Hi All, What is the correct interpratation of A = '001' B = A[1,3] + 0 PRINT B On UV 9.6 I get 0010 contrary to my expectation of 1. What is the logical explanation of this. Does UV use '+' for string

Re: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-02 Thread Mark Johnson
rco Manyevere To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2004 11:13 PM Subject: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0 Hi All, What is the correct interpratation of A = '001' B = A[1,3] + 0 PRINT B On UV 9.6 I get 0010 contrary to my expectation

RE: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-02 Thread Stuart Boydell
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Mark Johnson... This brings up another aspect of the text/string situation: Consider this A="00"[1,3] ;*zeros for both lines B="00"[1,2] PRINT (A=B) and you would expect

The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-01 Thread Marco Manyevere
Hi All, What is the correct interpratation of A = '001' B = A[1,3] + 0 PRINT B On UV 9.6 I get 0010 contrary to my expectation of 1. What is the logical explanation of this. Does UV use '+' for string concatenation as well? Then why doesnt '123' + '456' result in '123456' (I get a runtime

RE: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-01 Thread Logan, David (SST - Adelaide)
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0 Hi All, What is the correct interpratation of A = '001' B = A[1,3] + 0 PRINT B On UV 9.6 I get 0010 contrary to my expectation of 1. What is the logical explanation of this. Does UV use '+' for string

RE: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0

2004-02-01 Thread John Laughlin
, February 01, 2004 8:14 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: The result of VARIABLE[1,3] + 0 Hi All, What is the correct interpratation of A = '001' B = A[1,3] + 0 PRINT B On UV 9.6 I get 0010 contrary to my expectation of 1. What is the logical explanation of this. Does UV use