Re: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented?

2011-12-13 Thread Brian Leach
to resurrect it in my new toolkit. :) Brian -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Ross Ferris Sent: 13 December 2011 03:18 To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented? Yes - is also supported

Re: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented?

2011-12-13 Thread Wjhonson
In what language is the interpreter / compiler for your new dev environment written ? -Original Message- From: Brian Leach br...@brianleach.co.uk To: 'U2 Users List' u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Tue, Dec 13, 2011 7:35 am Subject: Re: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented? And FWIW my

Re: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented?

2011-12-13 Thread Brian Leach
- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wjhonson Sent: 13 December 2011 17:19 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented? In what language is the interpreter / compiler for your new dev environment written

Re: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented?

2011-12-13 Thread Wjhonson
@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Tue, Dec 13, 2011 9:50 am Subject: Re: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented? Will he interpreter is in C#. he compiler is in UniVerse - I know that seems mad but there are good rchitectural reasons. That's all I'm going to say for now - there are a couple of sites using it ut

Re: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented?

2011-12-13 Thread DavidJMurray (mvdbs.com)
SB+ is not object-oriented. It is actually highly-functional in nature - the underlining PROCESS call structure is: @RTN.FLAG = PROCESS(@PARMS, @VALUE) Where @RTN.FLAG is an output, @PARMS is an input and @VALUE is normally the output, but can be used as an input also. This is common to all

Re: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented?

2011-12-13 Thread Wjhonson
Why would I want to? To Keep Pick BASIC alive and kicking more. -Original Message- From: DavidJMurray (mvdbs.com) nab...@mvdbs.com To: u2-users u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Tue, Dec 13, 2011 1:42 pm Subject: Re: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented? SB+ is not object-oriented

Re: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented?

2011-12-13 Thread Tony Gravagno
From: Wjhonson Envision if you will, a compiler written in Pick BASIC, which can compile an object-oriented syntax. Two passes, first turning the syntax into ordinary Pick BASIC code, and then compiling that. That's not a concept that needs to be envisioned as though it's new and has

[U2] Is SB+ object-oriented?

2011-12-12 Thread Wjhonson
Can Pick BASIC code simulate an object oriented environment? ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Re: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented?

2011-12-12 Thread Israel, John R.
@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented? Can Pick BASIC code simulate an object oriented environment? ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Re: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented?

2011-12-12 Thread Symeon Breen
December 2011 20:17 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented? Can Pick BASIC code simulate an object oriented environment? ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented?

2011-12-12 Thread Wjhonson
ent: 12 December 2011 20:17 o: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org ubject: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented? an Pick BASIC code simulate an object oriented environment? ___ 2-Users mailing list 2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org ttp://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented?

2011-12-12 Thread Ross Ferris
-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Is SB+ object-oriented? Can Pick BASIC code simulate an object oriented environment? ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users