Re: [U2] [UV] Triggers, transaction state and interaction with the 'outside world' {Unclassified}

2005-09-08 Thread Craig Bennett
Mike, I think your best solution would the IBM MQSeries interface (be aware that IBM have not provided access to the transaction/rollback aspects of MQ in their UV interface, this has led us to not switch to the new UV-MQ interface). If you can't use the MQSeries interface (and fair enough

Re: [U2] [UV] Triggers, transaction state and interaction with the 'outside world' {Unclassified}

2005-09-08 Thread Ray Wurlod
Sequential file I/O is permitted while a transaction is active, so your trigger subroutine could write to a file that some server process (not in a transaction) was waiting on. Sequential file I/O statements can also work with named pipes, though these are more difficult in a Windows

RE: [U2] [UV] Triggers, transaction state and interaction with the 'outside world' {Unclassified}

2005-09-08 Thread HENDERSON MIKE, MR
Craig -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Bennett Sent: Thursday, 8 September 2005 18:27 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Triggers, transaction state and interaction with the 'outside world' {Unclassified

Re: [U2] [UV] Triggers, transaction state and interaction with the 'outside world' {Unclassified}

2005-09-08 Thread Craig Bennett
Mike, In this particular instance, 'hard real-time' isn't an issue, a delay of a few seconds would be quite OK. I wasn't commenting on hard real-time. MQ Series and MSMQ guarantee delivery not delivery time (I could be wrong about MSMQ). Rather I was thinking about how guaranteed you need

Re: [U2] [UV] Triggers, transaction state and interaction with the 'outside world' {Unclassified}

2005-09-08 Thread Craig Bennett
Mike, have a look at this MSMQ example from MSDN: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/msmq/msmq_using_transactions_1gz2.asp I don't know if GCI presents any special problems under windows but this looks like it might work to send a single message transaction

RE: [U2] [UV] Triggers, transaction state and interaction with the 'outside world' {Unclassified}

2005-09-07 Thread Allen E. Elwood
D) Have trigger spawn a phantom which instantly does the job and kills itself??? hth, Allen www.tortillafc.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of HENDERSON MIKE, MR Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 18:27 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Cc:

RE: [U2] [UV] Triggers, transaction state and interaction with the 'outside world' {Unclassified}

2005-09-07 Thread Stuart . Boydell
--- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV] Triggers, transaction state and interaction with the 'outside world' {Unclassified}

2005-09-07 Thread phil walker
Mike, I am not sure if this is officially supported but I have done it in a couple of sites. You can change a couple of the settings in the VOC record for the command you want to run. DOS or create an separate entry to the executable itself. Change attribute 4 of the voc entry to include one of

RE: [U2] [UV] Triggers, transaction state and interaction with the 'outside world' {Unclassified}

2005-09-07 Thread David Jordan
Hi Mike A couple of suggestions. 1. Biztalk has an interface to IBM MQ message service. You could use IBM MQ to talk from U2 to Biztalk. (I do not know if there are issues with transaction state and MQ) 2. You could set up a type 1 file and write the transaction to that file. In Biztalk,