, May 29, 2013 10:12 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products
And from Bluefinity we certainly welcome Dan's endorsement to technology that
enhances the use of U2 and makes for happy, long term users as this is great
for everyone. There are certainly a lot
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Perry Taylor
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 7:34 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products
Thanks to everyone for all the great
: Thursday, May 30, 2013 9:30 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products
Hi Perry,
I'm a bit late to the party, but we (FusionWare) have a Managed Provider
(ADO.NET) that works with U2 and is portable to other MultiValue platforms. If
you're looking at options
small to huge.
Thank you,
Robert
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Perry Taylor
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:35 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products
Hello
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 1:52 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products
From: Daniel McGrath
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Daniel McGrath
Sent: 29 May 2013 15:27
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products
Thanks for the reply Tony,
I can't speak for anyone
HI,
Just for enlarge the question.
On the U2 side, we choose to develop and expose web-services ; RESTful format,
From now, our .Net, j-script, java, androïd, ...Thrid-party app call htpp
to request U2.
Then we work as a team of U2 devs and third-party devs or designer ... the best
on each
Uniobjects.Net is the base requirement. MV.NET builds on this and gives you
a heap more (tho infact you can use it without uniobjects.net)
So it depends if you want simple connectivity to the DB to do commands and
subroutine calls, for which uniobject.net would suffice, or if you want any
of the
I've used the UO.NET library with no issues with both ASP.NET web sites and
Windows forms applications for years now...
But the devil in the details and those may impact which tool is better
Do the 3rd party tools offer some feature you foresee as a requirement
that UO.NET does not provide?
UO.NET has been superseded by U2 Toolkit for .NET (or more accurately, subsumed
by it), so you really should be looking at that for .NET development.
http://u2.rocketsoftware.com/products/u2-toolkit-for-.net/at-a-glance
It has a free component, which includes all of your UO.NET functionality,
I'll preface by saying I catch some heat when I advocate some
products, because I happen to sell them too. People confuse the cause
and effect there. I sell products because I use them - I'm putting my
money where my mouth is. I was using them first as a choice, having
considered other options
9:47 am
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products
I'll preface by saying I catch some heat when I advocate some
products, because I happen to sell them too. People confuse the cause
and effect there. I sell products because I use them - I'm putting my
money where my mouth
@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] UniObjects.Net vs Thrid-party Products
I'll preface by saying I catch some heat when I advocate some products,
because I happen to sell them too. People confuse the cause and effect there. I
sell products because I use them - I'm putting my money where my mouth is. I
From: Wjhonson
You stated below that its transportable.
Maybe you could give a few examples of what mv.NET can do for
those who don't need the transportable feature.
Fair question. I'll provide some examples here but invite anyone with
more detailed interest to contact me directly.
- mv.NET
From: Daniel McGrath
Tony, out of curiosity, have you looked at UO.NET's replacement: U2
Toolkit for .NET?
Not recently bud. Once I settle on a toolkit that works well, my
research in that specific area slows down. How much research do we
continue to do on cars after we've made a purchase? Do
15 matches
Mail list logo
