[ADMIN] Why multiple digests, and a lecture on Netetiquette

2004-02-04 Thread Moderator
Greetings, All.

I have received some inquiries as to why the new list server will 
sometimes send out two digests in one day.

The digest normally is generated at 23:55 PST (USA). However, sometimes 
the volume of the postings is such that the digest can get huge. When 
that happens, not only does it take a long time to send them all, but 
some people do not get them; their mail service limits the size of 
incoming messages. So I have a threshold of 300KB set. During the day, 
if that is reached, it will kick off a digest at that point in addition 
to the one that goes out at night.

Notice that I said volume of the posts, not number of posts. What 
causes this volume in most cases? OVER-QUOTING. When you hit Reply, add 
a couple of lines at the top of the message, and do not bother to delete 
all but the most relevant lines of the most recent message, you 
contribute to the problem. There is no reason to be constantly quoting 
the entire thread. Even worse is the quoting and re-quoting of all of 
the footer garbage that HR departments tack on to email these days. (Or 
that list servers like this one add for identification, to be fair.)

The general (very general) guideline of netiquette is that you should 
quote only about four lines of the most recent post for each point to 
which you are responding. If you are replying to several points, do not 
top-post. Quote four or five lines, add your point, quote some more, add 
your point, etc. (There are many lists where you will get yelled at by 
the Moderator, as I found out the hard way, for even top-posting at all. 
This list is not one of those. :-)

'Nuff said.

--

Regards,

Clif

~~~
W. Clifton Oliver, CCP
CLIFTON OLIVER  ASSOCIATES
Tel: +1 619 460 5678Web: www.oliver.com
~~~
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


RE: [ADMIN] Why multiple digests, and a lecture on Netetiquette

2004-02-04 Thread Dawn M. Wolthuis
Cool, saving bits - most of us over 40 grew up doing that ;-) -dawn
PS Video attachment omitted

-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


RE: [ADMIN] Why multiple digests, and a lecture on Netetiquette

2004-02-04 Thread Ken Wallis
John Cassidy wrote:

Bits? You had Bits? All we had were 1's. Unary.
And we were darn glad to have 'em.

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/4/04 11:27:09 AM

Back in my day, bits were smaller. We only had 0.5 and 1.

There are 10 types of people who understand binary code: those who do 
those who don't


-- 
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users