Re: Redback Properties

2004-02-03 Thread D Averch
Yes... - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "U2 Users Discussion List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 8:39 AM Subject: Re: Redback Properties > > Would the negatively affect all other methods/objects? > > Vance >

Re: Redback Properties

2004-02-03 Thread vance . alspach
com> cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: Redback Properties

RE: Redback Properties

2004-02-03 Thread Don Verhagen
Mike, I do as Vance does. As far as I know Redback properties are similiar to an attribute in a record in MV, and as such can only contain VM and SVM (2-dimensions) for REDBACK to handle it through Redback.RedFields. But as Vance suggests there is a way around it, you just need to create your

Re: Redback Properties

2004-02-03 Thread D Averch
st" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 7:02 AM Subject: RE: Redback Properties > > Mike, > > That is what I thought and we are currently converting field marks to pipe > characters. It seems to work well but since I could not find any > supporting informa

RE: Redback Properties

2004-02-03 Thread vance . alspach
Sent by: Subject: RE: Redback Properties u2-users-bounces@

RE: Redback Properties

2004-02-03 Thread Mike Randall
EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Redback Properties Is it possible to send an entire record in a single Redback Property? When I attempt to send the entire record, the RedPage only returns the first attribute. I could not find anything in the documentation short of allowing multivalues and subvalues. In a nut

Redback Properties

2004-02-03 Thread vance . alspach
Is it possible to send an entire record in a single Redback Property? When I attempt to send the entire record, the RedPage only returns the first attribute. I could not find anything in the documentation short of allowing multivalues and subvalues. In a nutshell what I am really trying to accom