Those of you tinkering with this, what is the best firmware to run currently?
What firmware was shown on the big screen demo last November?
was that 8.x beta?
Thanks in advance ;)
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
When looking at connections you have to take every statistic into
consideration. Just looking at a -67 can cause some issues down the
road. 9.75 modulation says theres something else going on and a 13/13
isnt good either.
You might put the rocket inside a metal case and see how that helps. Is
Yes
On 7/14/2016 8:17 AM, Shawn Burgei wrote:
Has anyone else had issues with AC2 V22 leaving blank gaps in the
bandwidth charts?
Thanks,
Shawn
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
Thanks Matt… That would be great to get that fixed!
Thanks Shawn
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Matt Hardy via Ubnt_users
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2016 2:21 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re:
Hi guys,
Let me check with the developers and see if they have any ideas... I'll let
you know what I find.
Thanks,
Matt
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Ridgetop Networks <
and...@ridgetopnetworks.com> wrote:
> Yep, I started seeing them sometime in the past few versions as well.
>
> On Thu,
The -81 connection needs to go.
The council one needs to be tested under load and see if it improves.
We don't allow clients worse than -72 on our M365 gear.
--
On 7/14/2016 12:33 PM, Andy Trimmell wrote:
The user with the 1.625 modulation and the few in single digits are
causing your AP
The user with the 1.625 modulation and the few in single digits are causing
your AP to give the latency. Correct those crappy connections and the latency
will dissipate.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mark Montgomery
Sent: Thursday,
Sorry, I forgot the attachment:
Mark Montgomery
Owner
Net-Change.Com
252-482-7683
252-333-0154
> On Jul 14, 2016, at 12:27 PM, Mark Montgomery wrote:
>
> Does anyone have an idea why subscribers on an AP would have high latency as
> shown below? The latency number
Does anyone have an idea why subscribers on an AP would have high latency as
shown below? The latency number fluctuates from 1 or 2 to as high as the
example below. Could the AP have a problem or could a subscriber be causing the
problem? We have two other AP’s on this water tank. They seem to
yup... we see the gaps as well.
Not sure what is causing it but I think we saw them since they changed how
they do the database.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Shawn Burgei wrote:
> Has anyone else had issues with AC2 V22 leaving blank gaps in the
> bandwidth charts?
>
Has anyone else had issues with AC2 V22 leaving blank gaps in the
bandwidth charts?
Thanks,
Shawn
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
11 matches
Mail list logo