Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?

2014-11-11 Thread Rory Conaway
So then are any of the Rockets getting the new processors other than the Titaniums? Rory From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 6:21 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] XW

Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?

2014-11-11 Thread Mathew Howard
Yep, the last normal Rocket M5's I got are XW. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Rory Conaway [r...@triadwireless.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 9:53 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] XW

Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?

2014-11-11 Thread Rory Conaway
So, does that mean we get Titanium performance at Rocket prices? What is the build code on the radio? Rory From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 9:06 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re:

Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?

2014-11-11 Thread Mathew Howard
I'm not sure... I think the Ti may have more RAM and the normal M5 still doesn't have gigabit ethernet - whether that has any real affect, I don't know. I did a bit of digging in the startup logs, and if I'm reading this right the XW Rocket and NanoBeam are both a MIPS 74Kc clocked at 535mhz.

Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?

2014-11-11 Thread Mathew Howard
The build code on the XW Rockets I have is 1413G. I should mention, I bought a couple more from the same vendor after I got these ones and got XM's (with an older build code though). From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of

Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?

2014-11-11 Thread Mathew Howard
Does anyone know if there is such a thing as an XW NanoBridge M5? or are those still XM, since they're being replaced by the NanoBeam eventually anyway? It would be nice to be able able to get better performance out of some of our NanoBridge links without having to drag a whole new dish up the

Re: [Ubnt_users] Requirements...

2014-11-11 Thread Sam
Actually, eDirectory runs circles around AD. And it runs on just about every platform. Sam On 9/11/2014 13:21, Mike Hammett wrote: Linux takes less time to setup than Windows, though nothing can hold a candle to AD. I run both Windows and Linux servers, mostly Linux. Most any reasonably

Re: [Ubnt_users] Requirements...

2014-11-11 Thread Josh Reynolds
Talking about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NetIQ_eDirectory and this: https://www.netiq.com/products/edirectory/ ? Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com http://www.spitwspots.com On 11/11/2014 11:43 AM, Sam wrote: Actually, eDirectory runs circles around AD.