Looks like the phones have been approved. Sigh, no nanobeams /
powerbeams yet.
--
signature
http://www.infowest.com/Randy Cosby
InfoWest, Inc
435-674-0165 x 2010
infowest.com http://www.infowest.com/
This e-mail message contains information from InfoWest, Inc
and is for the sole
http://www.infowest.com/Randy Cosby
InfoWest, Inc
435-674-0165 x 2010
infowest.com http://www.infowest.com/
This e-mail message contains information from InfoWest, Inc
and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information
https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airFiber/Important-in-case-you-have-an-AF-5X-radio-with-ethernet/m-p/1855220#U1855220
Zip ties and dielectric grease.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 12:48 PM
We recently came across a similar situation. The previous ISP was using low
modulation rates as a way to limit the customer bandwidth because they lacked
any other mechanism for doing so. So a customer with a 10M commit rate plan was
being set to MCS1. 20M got MCS3, etc.
So wrong.
We’ve done same SSID everywhere for some time, but need to have a combination
of ACL on the APs, and / or WPA-EAP that would only auth on the correct AP,
along with scripts to enforce everything. We’re now moving to unique SSIDs on
each AP after weighing the pros and cons. As far as same SSID
Working very well for us. Even from earliest pre-release it's been stable.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kevin Sullivan
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 4:31 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: [Ubnt_users] GPS sync with M radios
