Re: [Ubnt_users] FCC regulation Part 15.407 (a)(2), (h)(2) question

2014-10-27 Thread Mathew Howard
If you're using older Rockets, you'll need to request an activation code and new FCCID labels from UBNT, and be on firmware that (legally) supports DFS. If the Rockets are relatively new, just make sure the EIRP doesn't exceed 30dBm and you should be fine. Also, 5150-5250mhz can be used with

Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?

2014-11-10 Thread Mathew Howard
/googleicon.png]https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]https://twitter.com/ICSIL From: Mathew

Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?

2014-11-10 Thread Mathew Howard
...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 3:49 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos? oh... yeah, I read that wrong. don't mind me, my

Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?

2014-11-11 Thread Mathew Howard
on the boxes that talk about the faster! new and improved! products. Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.comhttp://www.spitwspots.com On 11/10/2014 03:43 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: It does. anything with XW firmware on it is going to have the newer, faster processor

Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?

2014-11-11 Thread Mathew Howard
: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 9:06 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos? Yep, the last normal Rocket M5's I got are XW

Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?

2014-11-11 Thread Mathew Howard
-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 9:06 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos? Yep, the last normal Rocket M5's I got are XW. From

Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?

2014-11-11 Thread Mathew Howard
the tower. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Mathew Howard [mat...@litewire.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 12:04 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos? The build

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5 distance

2014-12-01 Thread Mathew Howard
As long as it has good line of site and 5.8ghz is clean enough, it should work fine. According to the built in link calculator, it should be able to do 149.76Mbps using 20mhz channels at 13 miles... if you need more than that, you can use wider channels, but that's going to be using pretty much

Re: [Ubnt_users] Scrap the Unifi Phones - I want a signal readout on my watch

2014-12-01 Thread Mathew Howard
This is a good idea! I can't see any reason why it shouldn't work... it's just a matter of getting somebody to make an app. It looks like there actually is a web browser that runs on the watches, so it might even be possible already, although I'm guessing that wouldn't be very usable.

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5 distance

2014-12-01 Thread Mathew Howard
Any chance you can find two smaller channels and use it in full duplex? the nice thing about running the AF5 in full duplex is that the channels only need to be clean at the receive end... and if you don't need as much capacity one direction, you can use a smaller channel.

Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl

2014-12-01 Thread Mathew Howard
5.6 beta 5 actually does support the 5.1 band. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 3:42 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New

Re: [Ubnt_users] Scrap the Unifi Phones - I want a signal readout on my watch

2014-12-01 Thread Mathew Howard
There is a browser for Android Wear... which seems to be what most of the watches are running. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.appfour.wearbrowserhl=en From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Josh Luthman

Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl

2014-12-02 Thread Mathew Howard
just supported all the hardware they sell and if the AirGateway firmware gets out of Beta before the Cubs win the World Series. Rory From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 11:08 AM To: Ubiquiti Users

Re: [Ubnt_users] New airControl

2014-12-02 Thread Mathew Howard
:: www.spitwspots.comhttp://www.spitwspots.com On 12/02/2014 09:41 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: And that's the problem here... If they want to make a hosted thing with integrated billing that nobody seems to want, that's fine with me, but it isn't a replacement for airControl. Just make something

Re: [Ubnt_users] Watchdog

2014-12-07 Thread Mathew Howard
If we're talking about the ping watchdog, yeah... I'm pretty sure it's just a reboot. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com] Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2014 2:30 PM To: Ubiquiti

Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems

2014-12-08 Thread Mathew Howard
I wonder if there's some kind of a bug with entering the DFS code when it's in compliance mode. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 10:19 AM To:

Re: [Ubnt_users] Old Rockets, weird problems

2014-12-08 Thread Mathew Howard
AM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote: I wonder if there's some kind of a bug with entering the DFS code when it's in compliance mode. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

2014-12-09 Thread Mathew Howard
We have a couple of links up... I haven't really seen any problems with them. I think the NanoBeam AC might be new... at least I hadn't seen it before, but otherwise, no, nothing new. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

2014-12-09 Thread Mathew Howard
I'm pretty sure one of the last betas actually did add PtMP I wouldn't expect backwards compatibility any too soon though. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net] Sent: Tuesday,

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

2014-12-09 Thread Mathew Howard
...) - PTMP enabled on R5AC-LITE The R5AC-PTMP (AirPrism AP) will be announced shortly. Thanks, Ben On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote: We have a couple of links up... I haven't really seen any problems with them. I think the NanoBeam AC

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

2014-12-09 Thread Mathew Howard
be done with that). Will send out some details shortly on PTMP networks in the wild ;) On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote: ha... I just Rocket and PowerBeam and assumed they were the same ones. I guess I should actually read stuff

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

2014-12-09 Thread Mathew Howard
: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs ;-) I think you guys will really like the new SW tools being added (especially the persistent spectrum analyzer...lots that can be done with that). Will send out some details shortly on PTMP networks in the wild ;) On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Mathew Howard mat

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

2014-12-09 Thread Mathew Howard
11n. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote: That's what I've been assuming too... Ben, can you tell us whether it's going to be backwards compatibility added to the AC series, or forward compatibility added to the M series

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

2014-12-09 Thread Mathew Howard
kind of cautious as the old NS didn't work too well on Airmax APs (RM2 for example). Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote: Well, an NSM2

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

2014-12-10 Thread Mathew Howard
, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net mailto:mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote: Yes, the spectrum analyzer is quite nice... even if the only Rocket I have that it works on is sitting on my desk. :p So is the only

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

2014-12-16 Thread Mathew Howard
...@pcswin.commailto:st...@pcswin.com wrote: +1000 Steve Barnes PCSWIN.com From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 5:27 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group

Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs

2014-12-16 Thread Mathew Howard
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11ac Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote: I thought AC chipsets were 5ghz only... is that not that case

Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios

2014-12-16 Thread Mathew Howard
I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at this point... From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Josh Reynolds [j...@spitwspots.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:56 PM To: ubnt_users@wispa.org Subject: Re:

Re: [Ubnt_users] Any hope for 3.65GHz AC radios

2014-12-16 Thread Mathew Howard
information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.comhttp://www.spitwspots.com On 12/16/2014 05:09 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: Actually, now that I think about it, full duplex probably wouldn't be possible in 3.65... which makes airfiber a whole lot less interesting - I'm not sure it would realistically

Re: [Ubnt_users] [WISPA Members] What in the world could be causing this?

2014-12-21 Thread Mathew Howard
What he's describing is exactly what it looks like when you get water in a cable though, pins 4/5 almost always appear burnt. It can happen with any kind of cable if it gets nicked or sliced... although, I guess it shouldn't happen with gel filled... From:

Re: [Ubnt_users] [WISPA Members] What in the world could be causing this?

2014-12-21 Thread Mathew Howard
505-966-6389tel:505-966-6389 On Dec 21, 2014, at 10:01 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote: What he's describing is exactly what it looks like when you get water in a cable though, pins 4/5 almost always appear burnt. It can happen with any kind of cable

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

2015-01-03 Thread Mathew Howard
AF5 has been DFS approved since it first shipped. however, it will only go down to 5.4ghz due to hardware (filter/antenna) limitations, so 5.2ghz won't be happening on the current hardware. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5

2015-01-03 Thread Mathew Howard
: [Ubnt_users] AF5 So 5.2 won't work? New hardware release needed? Sent from my iPad Chris Soiles Owner Rio Cities csoi...@riocities.netmailto:csoi...@riocities.net 505-966-6389tel:505-966-6389 On Jan 3, 2015, at 6:30 PM, Mathew Howard mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote: AF5 has been

Re: [Ubnt_users] airfiber 3

2016-06-23 Thread Mathew Howard
I'm not sure you'll get 300 meg out of it, but it's probably going to work better than 2.4ghz... unless 2.4 happens to be pretty clean in the area (and you aren't using it for anything else). our AF3x link is doing a little under 300 meg (210 down/66 up, at the moment) with a -59, so you might

Re: [Ubnt_users] airfiber 3

2016-06-23 Thread Mathew Howard
I haven't done any AF2x links, but you should be able to do 8x with that kind of signal, depending on the noise. But... what Josh said. I would expect 2.4ghz to be pretty much useless for any other purpose once you put up an AF2x. From:

Re: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber power draw on Netonix switch

2016-07-25 Thread Mathew Howard
But... if an AF5x actually is drawing that much power, there's probably something wrong with it - I haven't ever seen one draw over 10 watts. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Matt Hoppes

Re: [Ubnt_users] Config file restore

2016-08-13 Thread Mathew Howard
I've never run into any problems either... you might find a few settings that you'll want to fix after the restore (like the antenna size), but I haven't ever run into anything that causes any real problems. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org

Re: [Ubnt_users] More AF5x woes

2016-08-08 Thread Mathew Howard
We had a similar issue... I believe it was water in one of the antenna connectors, but we eventually ended up replacing everything. What kind of dish are you using? From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Josh Luthman

Re: [Ubnt_users] More AF5x woes

2016-08-08 Thread Mathew Howard
, August 08, 2016 12:44 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] More AF5x woes Arc 2 foot Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 8, 2016 1:40 PM, "Mathew Howard" <mat...@litewire.net<mailto:mat...@lite

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x GPS Antenna

2017-02-27 Thread Mathew Howard
but the epmp ones do work... probably doesn't help much though. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com] Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 4:39 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re:

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x GPS Antenna

2017-02-27 Thread Mathew Howard
a backhaul. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Feb 27, 2017 8:26 PM, "Mathew Howard" <mat...@litewire.net<mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote: but the epmp ones do work... probably do

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x GPS Antenna

2017-02-28 Thread Mathew Howard
...@imaginenetworksllc.com] Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 8:04 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x GPS Antenna Epmp is getting GPS without the antenna? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Feb 27, 2017 8:37 PM, "Mathew Howard&q

Re: [Ubnt_users] Bad Omni???

2016-09-04 Thread Mathew Howard
Yeah... I would replace it. You might be able to just take it apart and re-glue everything, but it's probably really not worth while. I only remember having a similar failure on one, which also had the top cap come off - which I think is what caused the glue to fail, since the drain holes

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11x Question.

2016-09-16 Thread Mathew Howard
>From what I understand, they do function the same as normal full duplex >high/low radios, but they have a adjustable diplexer so the same radio can >function as a high or low - but they do not appear to be capable of running in >half duplex mode and transmitting and receiving on the same

Re: [Ubnt_users] 2.4 throughput. gotta love being a wisp

2017-01-05 Thread Mathew Howard
I haven't tried using the ubnt speed test in years, but I always considered it to be pretty much worthless. Perhaps it's better than it used to be, I don't know. I think 10Mbps is probably pushing it a bit. With clean channels and 20mhz channels, I wouldn't think twice about selling 10 meg

Re: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber 5x power consumption

2017-01-05 Thread Mathew Howard
I've measured similar power consumption... the spec sheet is definitely on the high side. I usually figure 8 watts for planning purposes, but I haven't ever seen them actually draw that much. According to ubiquiti, the input voltage is 19v to 53v now, but I don't think they are 802.3af

Re: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber 5x power consumption

2017-01-05 Thread Mathew Howard
, much love for the wide range of input voltage because I can totally see ourselves eventually moving to 48v if we ever did this again. -Steve On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Mathew Howard <mat...@litewire.net<mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote: I've measured similar power consumption

Re: [Ubnt_users] V 6.0.1 & 6.0.2

2017-03-29 Thread Mathew Howard
I upgraded a few 2.4ghz XM radios to 6.0.2 yesterday (needed AC compatibility)... so far so good, I haven't run into any problem yet. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Nick Bright [nick.bri...@valnet.net] Sent:

Re: [Ubnt_users] V 6.0.1 & 6.0.2

2017-03-29 Thread Mathew Howard
.0.2 Isn't AC 5GHz only? Or have I been living under a rock? -Steve D On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Mathew Howard <mat...@litewire.net<mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote: I upgraded a few 2.4ghz XM radios to 6.0.2 yesterday (needed AC compatibility)... so far so good, I have

Re: [Ubnt_users] V 6.0.1 & 6.0.2

2017-03-29 Thread Mathew Howard
To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] V 6.0.1 & 6.0.2 They are sold out in the Beta store to :-/ I missed the bandwagon on that one myself. - Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] V 6.0.1 & 6.0.2 From: "Mathew Howard" <mat...@litewire.net&g

Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

2017-04-16 Thread Mathew Howard
re never introduced ? > > Do you think that the other MFG would be under pressure to bring their > > absorbent product pricing down ? > > Phoopho it as much as you like, the facts don't change.. > > > > > :) > > > > > Happy Easter Everyone ! > > > >

Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

2017-04-17 Thread Mathew Howard
change.. > > :) > > Happy Easter Everyone ! > > Regards > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: > supp...@snappytelecom.net<m

Re: [Ubnt_users] 24Ghz link Airfiber

2017-04-13 Thread Mathew Howard
If you're running bandwidth tests from a MikroTik, I doubt that anything less than a CCR is going to be able to handle a 700Mbps TCP test. In my experience, if an AF24 is showing full capacity (770Mbps), it will do 700Mbps consistently. We have an inactive AF24 link (it was replaced with 11ghz

Re: [Ubnt_users] 4096 QAM (was: 24Ghz link Airfiber)

2017-04-15 Thread Mathew Howard
Not to mention the fact that you have to use fixed up/down ratios on the B11 to make sync work, which makes them even more inefficient...and adds a bunch of latency. All GPS sync really doesn't add any capabilities beyond what you get with a real FDD link (and actually does have a lot of

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11x Type N Jumpers

2017-05-10 Thread Mathew Howard
We used the Jirous dishes on our link, since the UBNT dishes weren't available at the time, and they do indeed come with jumpers (if I remember correctly, they're hardwired into the waveguide adapters). You definitely do not want to use normal LMR type jumpers - most N connectors aren't going

Re: [Ubnt_users] v6 opinions

2017-05-24 Thread Mathew Howard
;> wrote: So, now that its been brought up is anyone having good luck with any v6 in ptmp? I've put very little on v6 yet honestly. - Original Message - Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test From: "Mathew Howard" <mat...@litewire.net<mailto:mat...@litewire.net>>

Re: [Ubnt_users] test

2017-05-24 Thread Mathew Howard
or they're all just done complaining about bugs in v6... :p From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 9:00 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re:

Re: [Ubnt_users] Does anyone have a single UBNT AF-11FX-DUP-H they would like to sell me?

2018-05-22 Thread Mathew Howard
I'm pretty sure I've got one... let me know if you still need one, and I'll check in the morning to make sure it's an H, not an L. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Mike Lyon [mike.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x bad signal problems

2018-01-22 Thread Mathew Howard
We had one AF-5x link where one chain dropped by 10 or 15db (I don't remember exacty... it was awhile ago), and changing the radios and pigtails on both ends of the link made no difference. We ended up fixing it by replacing one of the dishes. My best guess was that the feedhorn itself had

Re: [Ubnt_users] airfiber 3

2018-01-30 Thread Mathew Howard
The max transmit power for 3.65ghz depends on what channel width you're using. If it's using 2' dishes, the antenna gain should be somewhere around 26dbi. I think you can go up to like 44db (or maybe 46... I don't remember for sure off hand) EIRP if you're using the full 40mhz channel, so

Re: [Ubnt_users] airfiber 3

2018-02-21 Thread Mathew Howard
Max TX power depends on the channel width in 3.65ghz. With the full 40mhz channel, I believe the AF3x will let you go up to 46db EIRP (the dish is 26dbi, so that would be 20dbm eirp, not accounting for any cable loss)... I assume that's what's actually allowed, but I'd have to look up the

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium

2018-08-12 Thread Mathew Howard
What Mike is saying, is pretty simple. Service provider revenue for the last quarter was $20 million lower than the previous two quarters, and they need something to blame that drop on. No, it's not like someone stole money out of their bank account, it's just that they didn't make as much as

Re: [Ubnt_users] Ubiquiti Sues Cambium

2018-08-12 Thread Mathew Howard
The fact that they did this just a couple weeks before their next report makes me suspect that service provider revenue fell even more this quarter. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Seth Mattinen

Re: [Ubnt_users] Airrouter

2018-04-12 Thread Mathew Howard
I like the Ignitenet routers. They're a bit more expensive, but they're nice routers. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Clay Stewart [cstew...@scsbroadband.com] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 8:15 AM To: Ubiquiti

Re: [Ubnt_users] Aiming AirFiber 5u 13mi link

2018-04-17 Thread Mathew Howard
Those are actually only 23dbi antennas... I agree, there's no way I'd try using an AirFiber 5 on a link that long. an AF-5x, 5xHD, or one of the many other connectorized radios out there, and at least 2' dishes is what you want. I would expect those things to link, as long as everything is

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x

2018-03-26 Thread Mathew Howard
/*Alex Phillips*/ > CEO and General Manager > RBNS.net > HighSpeedLink.net > *540-908-3993 <tel:(540)%20908-3993>* > Co-Host AmericanPriority.com American Priority Conference > September 6-8th 2018 > #AMP18 > @PriorityConf Twitte

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x

2018-03-26 Thread Mathew Howard
1:17 PM, Adair Winter wrote: > And it looks like you either have antenna gain set wrong or need to work > on the alignment, Matt. > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 12:01 PM Mathew Howard <mat...@litewire.net > <mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote: > > Yeah, but you h

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x

2018-03-26 Thread Mathew Howard
, Mar 26, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Mathew Howard <mat...@litewire.net<mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote: Does UBNT say to use 2db cable loss? that seems a little excessive to me... But yeah, I'd say alignment is either a bit off or you have some obstructions... you should have better

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 10x

2018-03-25 Thread Mathew Howard
I haven't ever been able to get the auto power back off to work properly... the first thing I'd try would be to turn that off and just set the max power to 18dbm... but the problem is, that when you do that, you're going to probably lose too much signal to maintain a 10x link (judging from the

Re: [Ubnt_users] Memory leak bug AF5x Version:v3.2-debug.28630

2018-03-03 Thread Mathew Howard
I have all of ours on 3.2.1 or newer, and haven't ever seen anything like that... for what that's worth. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com] Sent: Friday, March 02, 2018 10:33

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x won't link up anymore

2018-10-30 Thread Mathew Howard
I've noticed in the past that these radios have problems if chain 0 isn't working right, so yeah, I think you're right about the management being only on chain0. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Josh Luthman

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5xHD ethernet port limited to auto negotiation

2019-01-05 Thread Mathew Howard
to ground Real ground to line Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Sat, Jan 5, 2019, 5:45 PM Mathew Howard mailto:mat...@litewire.net> wrote: I'm curious how it was wired... On Jan 5, 2019 1:27 PM, Josh Luthman mailt

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5xHD ethernet port limited to auto negotiation

2019-01-05 Thread Mathew Howard
I'm curious how it was wired... On Jan 5, 2019 1:27 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: Replaced all kinds of cables and radios, third PboxPro, etc and no fix. Thought maybe the power supply could be bad or generating noise. Looked at the wiring. It was not right to say the least. I'm kind of surprised

Re: [Ubnt_users] AC Gen2 5Ghz Feedhorns

2018-12-12 Thread Mathew Howard
I concur From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org On Behalf Of James Wilson Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 1:42 PM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AC Gen2 5Ghz Feedhorns Yes for 2.4 Ghz feedhorns! :) On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 1:53 PM Tim Reichhart mailto:t...@nwohiobb.com>

Re: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber team - anyone left there?

2019-01-07 Thread Mathew Howard
Chuck Macenski is still around, isn't he? From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org on behalf of Josh Luthman Sent: Monday, January 7, 2019 9:30:27 AM To: Ubiquiti Users Group Subject: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber team - anyone left there? I was previously talking to Bill

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5xHD ethernet port limited to auto negotiation

2019-01-04 Thread Mathew Howard
, Jan 4, 2019 at 5:23 PM Mathew Howard mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote: We had a port go bad on a Mikrotik the other day, and after we plugged the customer's router into a different port, it still wouldn't pass any data until I disabled the bad port (actually, I think just removing i

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5xHD ethernet port limited to auto negotiation

2019-01-04 Thread Mathew Howard
Most devices won't let turn off auto negotiation on gigabit, but what you can do is set it to only advertise gig full (I know you can do this on the Mikrotik by just unchecking everything else, and I think you can do it on the af5xhd too, but I'm not certain about that). That probably isn't

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5xHD ethernet port limited to auto negotiation

2019-01-04 Thread Mathew Howard
unplug it from the PB Pro, problem goes away... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 5:12 PM Mathew Howard mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote: Most devices won't let turn off auto negotiation on gigabit, but wh

Re: [Ubnt_users] GPS antenna

2019-03-01 Thread Mathew Howard
Yeah, I have used UBNT GPS antennas on ePMP radios, and the other way around as well... no notable problems. I think the GPS antenna that UBNT used on the old 802.11N GPS radios (the ones that didn't actually work) were incompatible, but as far as I can tell the pucks from the Rocket AC and AFx

Re: [Ubnt_users] PowerBeam 2AC

2019-02-08 Thread Mathew Howard
Yes, the feedhorn will fit right into an old dish. From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org on behalf of Blair Davis Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 6:42:27 PM To: ubnt_users@wispa.org Subject: [Ubnt_users] PowerBeam 2AC Does anybody know if the electronics/nosecone

Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11 designations

2020-02-13 Thread Mathew Howard
Actually, no... with most radios you would use a 56mhz emmisions designation (you're using the 80mhz channel plan, but you are just licensing it as a 56mhz channel). Apparently the AF11 just doesn't have a clean enough signal to fit within 56mhz, so you have to use the full 80mhz. >From what