If you're using older Rockets, you'll need to request an activation code and
new FCCID labels from UBNT, and be on firmware that (legally) supports DFS. If
the Rockets are relatively new, just make sure the EIRP doesn't exceed 30dBm
and you should be fine.
Also, 5150-5250mhz can be used with
/googleicon.png]https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]https://twitter.com/ICSIL
From: Mathew
...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 3:49 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?
oh... yeah, I read that wrong.
don't mind me, my
on the boxes that talk about the faster! new and
improved! products.
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.comhttp://www.spitwspots.com
On 11/10/2014 03:43 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
It does. anything with XW firmware on it is going to have the newer, faster
processor
: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 9:06 AM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?
Yep, the last normal Rocket M5's I got are XW
-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 9:06 AM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?
Yep, the last normal Rocket M5's I got are XW.
From
the tower.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Mathew Howard [mat...@litewire.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 12:04 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] XW firmware on Nanostation 5M Locos?
The build
As long as it has good line of site and 5.8ghz is clean enough, it should work
fine. According to the built in link calculator, it should be able to do
149.76Mbps using 20mhz channels at 13 miles... if you need more than that, you
can use wider channels, but that's going to be using pretty much
This is a good idea! I can't see any reason why it shouldn't work... it's just
a matter of getting somebody to make an app.
It looks like there actually is a web browser that runs on the watches, so it
might even be possible already, although I'm guessing that wouldn't be very
usable.
Any chance you can find two smaller channels and use it in full duplex? the
nice thing about running the AF5 in full duplex is that the channels only need
to be clean at the receive end... and if you don't need as much capacity one
direction, you can use a smaller channel.
5.6 beta 5 actually does support the 5.1 band.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 3:42 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] New
There is a browser for Android Wear... which seems to be what most of the
watches are running.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.appfour.wearbrowserhl=en
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Josh Luthman
just supported all the hardware they sell
and if the AirGateway firmware gets out of Beta before the Cubs win the World
Series.
Rory
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 11:08 AM
To: Ubiquiti Users
:: www.spitwspots.comhttp://www.spitwspots.com
On 12/02/2014 09:41 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
And that's the problem here... If they want to make a hosted thing with
integrated billing that nobody seems to want, that's fine with me, but it isn't
a replacement for airControl.
Just make something
If we're talking about the ping watchdog, yeah... I'm pretty sure it's just a
reboot.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2014 2:30 PM
To: Ubiquiti
I wonder if there's some kind of a bug with entering the DFS code when it's in
compliance mode.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 10:19 AM
To:
AM, Mathew Howard
mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote:
I wonder if there's some kind of a bug with entering the DFS code when it's in
compliance mode.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
[ubnt_users-boun
We have a couple of links up... I haven't really seen any problems with them.
I think the NanoBeam AC might be new... at least I hadn't seen it before, but
otherwise, no, nothing new.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf
I'm pretty sure one of the last betas actually did add PtMP I wouldn't
expect backwards compatibility any too soon though.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Mike Hammett [wispaubntus...@ics-il.net]
Sent: Tuesday,
...)
- PTMP enabled on R5AC-LITE
The R5AC-PTMP (AirPrism AP) will be announced shortly.
Thanks,
Ben
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Mathew Howard
mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote:
We have a couple of links up... I haven't really seen any problems with them.
I think the NanoBeam AC
be done with that). Will send
out some details shortly on PTMP networks in the wild ;)
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Mathew Howard
mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote:
ha... I just Rocket and PowerBeam and assumed they were the same ones. I guess
I should actually read stuff
: [Ubnt_users] Rocket ACs
;-) I think you guys will really like the new SW tools being added (especially
the persistent spectrum analyzer...lots that can be done with that). Will send
out some details shortly on PTMP networks in the wild ;)
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Mathew Howard
mat
11n.
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Mathew Howard
mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote:
That's what I've been assuming too...
Ben, can you tell us whether it's going to be backwards compatibility added to
the AC series, or forward compatibility added to the M series
kind of cautious as the old NS didn't work too well on Airmax APs
(RM2 for example).
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Mathew Howard
mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote:
Well, an NSM2
, Mathew Howard
mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net
mailto:mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote:
Yes, the spectrum analyzer is quite nice... even if the only
Rocket I have that it works on is sitting on my desk. :p
So is the only
...@pcswin.commailto:st...@pcswin.com wrote:
+1000
Steve Barnes
PCSWIN.com
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 5:27 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11ac
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Mathew Howard
mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote:
I thought AC chipsets were 5ghz only... is that not that case
I'd be more interested in a 3.65ghz airfiber at this point...
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Josh Reynolds [j...@spitwspots.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:56 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: Re:
information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.comhttp://www.spitwspots.com
On 12/16/2014 05:09 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
Actually, now that I think about it, full duplex probably wouldn't be possible
in 3.65... which makes airfiber a whole lot less interesting - I'm not sure it
would realistically
What he's describing is exactly what it looks like when you get water in a
cable though, pins 4/5 almost always appear burnt. It can happen with any kind
of cable if it gets nicked or sliced... although, I guess it shouldn't happen
with gel filled...
From:
505-966-6389tel:505-966-6389
On Dec 21, 2014, at 10:01 PM, Mathew Howard
mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote:
What he's describing is exactly what it looks like when you get water in a
cable though, pins 4/5 almost always appear burnt. It can happen with any kind
of cable
AF5 has been DFS approved since it first shipped. however, it will only go down
to 5.4ghz due to hardware (filter/antenna) limitations, so 5.2ghz won't be
happening on the current hardware.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on
: [Ubnt_users] AF5
So 5.2 won't work? New hardware release needed?
Sent from my iPad
Chris Soiles
Owner
Rio Cities
csoi...@riocities.netmailto:csoi...@riocities.net
505-966-6389tel:505-966-6389
On Jan 3, 2015, at 6:30 PM, Mathew Howard
mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote:
AF5 has been
I'm not sure you'll get 300 meg out of it, but it's probably going to work
better than 2.4ghz... unless 2.4 happens to be pretty clean in the area (and
you aren't using it for anything else). our AF3x link is doing a little under
300 meg (210 down/66 up, at the moment) with a -59, so you might
I haven't done any AF2x links, but you should be able to do 8x with that kind
of signal, depending on the noise.
But... what Josh said. I would expect 2.4ghz to be pretty much useless for any
other purpose once you put up an AF2x.
From:
But... if an AF5x actually is drawing that much power, there's probably
something wrong with it - I haven't ever seen one draw over 10 watts.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Matt Hoppes
I've never run into any problems either... you might find a few settings that
you'll want to fix after the restore (like the antenna size), but I haven't
ever run into anything that causes any real problems.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org
We had a similar issue... I believe it was water in one of the antenna
connectors, but we eventually ended up replacing everything.
What kind of dish are you using?
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Josh Luthman
, August 08, 2016 12:44 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] More AF5x woes
Arc 2 foot
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Aug 8, 2016 1:40 PM, "Mathew Howard"
<mat...@litewire.net<mailto:mat...@lite
but the epmp ones do work... probably doesn't help much though.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 4:39 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re:
a backhaul.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Feb 27, 2017 8:26 PM, "Mathew Howard"
<mat...@litewire.net<mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote:
but the epmp ones do work... probably do
...@imaginenetworksllc.com]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 8:04 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AF5x GPS Antenna
Epmp is getting GPS without the antenna?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Feb 27, 2017 8:37 PM, "Mathew Howard&q
Yeah... I would replace it. You might be able to just take it apart and re-glue
everything, but it's probably really not worth while.
I only remember having a similar failure on one, which also had the top cap
come off - which I think is what caused the glue to fail, since the drain holes
>From what I understand, they do function the same as normal full duplex
>high/low radios, but they have a adjustable diplexer so the same radio can
>function as a high or low - but they do not appear to be capable of running in
>half duplex mode and transmitting and receiving on the same
I haven't tried using the ubnt speed test in years, but I always considered it
to be pretty much worthless. Perhaps it's better than it used to be, I don't
know.
I think 10Mbps is probably pushing it a bit. With clean channels and 20mhz
channels, I wouldn't think twice about selling 10 meg
I've measured similar power consumption... the spec sheet is definitely on the
high side. I usually figure 8 watts for planning purposes, but I haven't ever
seen them actually draw that much. According to ubiquiti, the input voltage is
19v to 53v now, but I don't think they are 802.3af
, much love for the wide range of input voltage because I can totally see
ourselves eventually moving to 48v if we ever did this again.
-Steve
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Mathew Howard
<mat...@litewire.net<mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote:
I've measured similar power consumption
I upgraded a few 2.4ghz XM radios to 6.0.2 yesterday (needed AC
compatibility)... so far so good, I haven't run into any problem yet.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Nick Bright [nick.bri...@valnet.net]
Sent:
.0.2
Isn't AC 5GHz only? Or have I been living under a rock?
-Steve D
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Mathew Howard
<mat...@litewire.net<mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote:
I upgraded a few 2.4ghz XM radios to 6.0.2 yesterday (needed AC
compatibility)... so far so good, I have
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] V 6.0.1 & 6.0.2
They are sold out in the Beta store to :-/ I missed the bandwagon on that one
myself.
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] V 6.0.1 & 6.0.2
From: "Mathew Howard" <mat...@litewire.net&g
re never introduced ?
> > Do you think that the other MFG would be under pressure to bring their
> > absorbent product pricing down ?
> > Phoopho it as much as you like, the facts don't change..
> >
>
> > :)
> >
>
> > Happy Easter Everyone !
> >
>
>
change..
>
> :)
>
> Happy Easter Everyone !
>
> Regards
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> 7266 SW 48 Street
> Miami, FL 33155
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email:
> supp...@snappytelecom.net<m
If you're running bandwidth tests from a MikroTik, I doubt that anything less
than a CCR is going to be able to handle a 700Mbps TCP test. In my experience,
if an AF24 is showing full capacity (770Mbps), it will do 700Mbps consistently.
We have an inactive AF24 link (it was replaced with 11ghz
Not to mention the fact that you have to use fixed up/down ratios on the B11 to
make sync work, which makes them even more inefficient...and adds a bunch of
latency.
All GPS sync really doesn't add any capabilities beyond what you get with a
real FDD link (and actually does have a lot of
We used the Jirous dishes on our link, since the UBNT dishes weren't available
at the time, and they do indeed come with jumpers (if I remember correctly,
they're hardwired into the waveguide adapters).
You definitely do not want to use normal LMR type jumpers - most N connectors
aren't going
;> wrote:
So, now that its been brought up is anyone having good luck with any v6 in
ptmp? I've put very little on v6 yet honestly.
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test
From: "Mathew Howard" <mat...@litewire.net<mailto:mat...@litewire.net>>
or they're all just done complaining about bugs in v6... :p
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 9:00 AM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re:
I'm pretty sure I've got one... let me know if you still need one, and I'll
check in the morning to make sure it's an H, not an L.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Mike Lyon [mike.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May
We had one AF-5x link where one chain dropped by 10 or 15db (I don't remember
exacty... it was awhile ago), and changing the radios and pigtails on both ends
of the link made no difference. We ended up fixing it by replacing one of the
dishes.
My best guess was that the feedhorn itself had
The max transmit power for 3.65ghz depends on what channel width you're using.
If it's using 2' dishes, the antenna gain should be somewhere around 26dbi. I
think you can go up to like 44db (or maybe 46... I don't remember for sure off
hand) EIRP if you're using the full 40mhz channel, so
Max TX power depends on the channel width in 3.65ghz. With the full 40mhz
channel, I believe the AF3x will let you go up to 46db EIRP (the dish is 26dbi,
so that would be 20dbm eirp, not accounting for any cable loss)... I assume
that's what's actually allowed, but I'd have to look up the
What Mike is saying, is pretty simple. Service provider revenue for the last
quarter was $20 million lower than the previous two quarters, and they need
something to blame that drop on.
No, it's not like someone stole money out of their bank account, it's just that
they didn't make as much as
The fact that they did this just a couple weeks before their next report makes
me suspect that service provider revenue fell even more this quarter.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Seth Mattinen
I like the Ignitenet routers. They're a bit more expensive, but they're nice
routers.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Clay Stewart [cstew...@scsbroadband.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 8:15 AM
To: Ubiquiti
Those are actually only 23dbi antennas...
I agree, there's no way I'd try using an AirFiber 5 on a link that long. an
AF-5x, 5xHD, or one of the many other connectorized radios out there, and at
least 2' dishes is what you want.
I would expect those things to link, as long as everything is
/*Alex Phillips*/
> CEO and General Manager
> RBNS.net
> HighSpeedLink.net
> *540-908-3993 <tel:(540)%20908-3993>*
> Co-Host AmericanPriority.com American Priority Conference
> September 6-8th 2018
> #AMP18
> @PriorityConf Twitte
1:17 PM, Adair Winter wrote:
> And it looks like you either have antenna gain set wrong or need to work
> on the alignment, Matt.
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 12:01 PM Mathew Howard <mat...@litewire.net
> <mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote:
>
> Yeah, but you h
, Mar 26, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Mathew Howard
<mat...@litewire.net<mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote:
Does UBNT say to use 2db cable loss? that seems a little excessive to me...
But yeah, I'd say alignment is either a bit off or you have some
obstructions... you should have better
I haven't ever been able to get the auto power back off to work properly... the
first thing I'd try would be to turn that off and just set the max power to
18dbm... but the problem is, that when you do that, you're going to probably
lose too much signal to maintain a 10x link (judging from the
I have all of ours on 3.2.1 or newer, and haven't ever seen anything like
that... for what that's worth.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Josh Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.com]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2018 10:33
I've noticed in the past that these radios have problems if chain 0 isn't
working right, so yeah, I think you're right about the management being only on
chain0.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of
Josh Luthman
to ground
Real ground to line
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019, 5:45 PM Mathew Howard
mailto:mat...@litewire.net> wrote:
I'm curious how it was wired...
On Jan 5, 2019 1:27 PM, Josh Luthman
mailt
I'm curious how it was wired...
On Jan 5, 2019 1:27 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Replaced all kinds of cables and radios, third PboxPro, etc and no fix.
Thought maybe the power supply could be bad or generating noise. Looked at the
wiring. It was not right to say the least. I'm kind of surprised
I concur
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org On Behalf Of
James Wilson
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 1:42 PM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] AC Gen2 5Ghz Feedhorns
Yes for 2.4 Ghz feedhorns! :)
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 1:53 PM Tim Reichhart
mailto:t...@nwohiobb.com>
Chuck Macenski is still around, isn't he?
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org on behalf of
Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2019 9:30:27 AM
To: Ubiquiti Users Group
Subject: [Ubnt_users] Airfiber team - anyone left there?
I was previously talking to Bill
, Jan 4, 2019 at 5:23 PM Mathew Howard
mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote:
We had a port go bad on a Mikrotik the other day, and after we plugged the
customer's router into a different port, it still wouldn't pass any data until
I disabled the bad port (actually, I think just removing i
Most devices won't let turn off auto negotiation on gigabit, but what you can
do is set it to only advertise gig full (I know you can do this on the Mikrotik
by just unchecking everything else, and I think you can do it on the af5xhd
too, but I'm not certain about that). That probably isn't
unplug it from the PB
Pro, problem goes away...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 5:12 PM Mathew Howard
mailto:mat...@litewire.net>> wrote:
Most devices won't let turn off auto negotiation on gigabit, but wh
Yeah, I have used UBNT GPS antennas on ePMP radios, and the other way around as
well... no notable problems. I think the GPS antenna that UBNT used on the old
802.11N GPS radios (the ones that didn't actually work) were incompatible, but
as far as I can tell the pucks from the Rocket AC and AFx
Yes, the feedhorn will fit right into an old dish.
From: ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org on behalf of
Blair Davis
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 6:42:27 PM
To: ubnt_users@wispa.org
Subject: [Ubnt_users] PowerBeam 2AC
Does anybody know if the electronics/nosecone
Actually, no... with most radios you would use a 56mhz emmisions designation
(you're using the 80mhz channel plan, but you are just licensing it as a 56mhz
channel). Apparently the AF11 just doesn't have a clean enough signal to fit
within 56mhz, so you have to use the full 80mhz.
>From what
81 matches
Mail list logo