Hi,
Alex:
and even making sure we have 1 person who is both DebianGIS and
Ubuntugis for coordination.
without getting too presumptuous, Frankie L. is an obvious person to
approach, but failing that that a crossover person could be me, but
tbh I'm not really sure how a PSC would actually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/13/2013 11:58 AM, Hamish wrote:
The main strategic decision we have right now is the repo
re-naming, which I think most of us are in fair agreement about
anyway.
Thanks for Your reply. By my oppinion there are much more
responsibilities of
Rather than taking decision, I think the PSC should make sure that
decisions are made.
Whatever we call them, I think the ideal PSC could learn a lot from
the osgeo live project. I think Cameron has done/is doing an excellent
job at managing that project, which in fact is quite similar to
Everyone,
I waited a little for the release of wxwidgets 3.0, which happened 2 days ago.
Since I see no objection to my plan I will continue and push the
updates to testing. If grass still builds fine there I will copy to
-unstable.
Johan
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Johan Van de Wauw
On 11/13/2013 02:58 AM, Hamish wrote:
Hi,
Alex:
and even making sure we have 1 person who is both DebianGIS and
Ubuntugis for coordination.
without getting too presumptuous, Frankie L. is an obvious person to
approach, but failing that that a crossover person could be me, but
tbh I'm
I agree with Hamish that, most importantly, what UbuntuGIS needs is
developers. People that are able to package. Ideally people that are
interested to also help DebianGIS. DebianGIS also need packagers. So
having a PSC without developers/packagers doesn't make sense to me. I'm
still very
