Re: [Ubuntu] Handling transitions in UbuntuGIS

2016-08-21 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > Currently only trusty and xenial are checked, precise is not worth the > effort IMNSHO: > > Just one remark: precise is still used a lot, and one important application are travis build scripts which are used by

Re: [Ubuntu] Handling transitions in UbuntuGIS

2016-07-30 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Angelos, On 07/26/2016 12:49 AM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: > The transitions have been handled manually so far. > Thanks for this tracker, it seems a better way to handle things. I guess manually means running `apt-cache rdepends ` to determine the reverse dependencies and rebuilding those with

Re: [Ubuntu] Handling transitions in UbuntuGIS

2016-07-25 Thread Angelos Tzotsos
Hi Bas, The transitions have been handled manually so far. Thanks for this tracker, it seems a better way to handle things. Best, Angelos On 07/23/2016 06:59 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Triggered by the recent spatialite-gui report, I've setup an experimental transition tracker for the

Re: [Ubuntu] Handling transitions in UbuntuGIS

2016-07-24 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Ivan, On 07/24/2016 11:54 PM, Ivan Mincik wrote: > On 24/07/16 03:59, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> Triggered by the recent spatialite-gui report, I've setup an >> experimental transition tracker for the ubuntugis-unstable PPA to check >> the state of the other packages. >> >> Currently only