Re: [Ubuntu] reviving ubuntugis

2015-02-17 Thread Ivan Mincik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Johan, thanks for this message. On 10.02.2015 23:48, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > Hi all, > > Ubuntugis has seen relatively little attention recently. Partly, > this may actually be a good sign: Debian GIS has been improving a > lot lately, which means

Re: [Ubuntu] reviving ubuntugis

2015-02-11 Thread Angelos Tzotsos
Hi Johan, On 02/11/2015 12:48 AM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: Hi all, Ubuntugis has seen relatively little attention recently. Partly, this may actually be a good sign: Debian GIS has been improving a lot lately, which means that Ubuntu Trusty (14.04) and Ubuntu Utopic (14.10) were released with m

Re: [Ubuntu] reviving ubuntugis

2015-02-11 Thread Randal Hale
"Not a developer" here. I've Ubuntu 14.04 (mate) installed - I jump back and forth between Linux and Windows. There has been talk of a PSC for UbuntuGIS - I would like to help except my packaging skills will do more harm than good. There's been confusion on my end (and I'm primarily a GIS guy

Re: [Ubuntu] reviving ubuntugis

2015-02-10 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > Hi all, > This are my thoughts, but I really want to encourage everyone to say > what should be the priorities. > Adding some statistics to the discussion Both ubuntugis stable and unstable are really used a lot This are the number of

[Ubuntu] reviving ubuntugis

2015-02-10 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
Hi all, Ubuntugis has seen relatively little attention recently. Partly, this may actually be a good sign: Debian GIS has been improving a lot lately, which means that Ubuntu Trusty (14.04) and Ubuntu Utopic (14.10) were released with many recent libraries/programs out of the box. Personally I be