Re: [Ubuntu] upgrade to qgis2.18

Hi, 2018-03-05 19:17 GMT+01:00 Andre Joost : > That was the solution. Now QGIS 2.14 from ubuntugis experimental installs > and runs without error. perfect, package copied to UbuntuGIS Unstable. Thanks for testing! Martin -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gisment

Re: [Ubuntu] upgrade to qgis2.18

Hi Angelos, 2018-02-28 23:43 GMT+01:00 Angelos Tzotsos : > Lets test for a few days before we push packages to unstable. tested on several computers including GRASS support. Took liberty to copy package to UbuntuGIS Unstable. Ma -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa h

Re: [Ubuntu] upgrade to qgis2.18

Hi Luis, 2018-03-07 17:55 GMT+01:00 Luí­s Moreira de Sousa : > QGis 2.18 is working quite well on this end (Ubuntu 16.04). Thank you for > your work on this. thanks for testing. But what means "quite well", something related to packaging? Ma -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvu

Re: [Ubuntu] Mismatch in binaryfulness. (arch) False != (files) True

Hi, 2018-03-03 22:14 GMT+01:00 Martin Landa : > I have created chroot for artful again from scratch. Packages are > still refused [1]. Uploading to UbuntuGIS works, no idea what could be > wrong. Ma strange, I used exactly the same commands on different computer (Ubuntu 16.04) and wa

Re: [Ubuntu] Mismatch in binaryfulness. (arch) False != (files) True

Hi, 2018-03-07 19:53 GMT+01:00 Martin Landa : > strange, I used exactly the same commands on different computer > (Ubuntu 16.04) and was able to upload package. For now "solved", not > sure why it's failing from my netebook (Debian Unstable). Ma I have this issue

Re: [Ubuntu] Mismatch in binaryfulness. (arch) False != (files) True

ame pc. Martin [1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/DebianUbuntuPackaging#Buildnewpackage -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa ___ UbuntuGIS mailing list Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/m

Re: [Ubuntu] Mismatch in binaryfulness. (arch) False != (files) True

Martin -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa ___ UbuntuGIS mailing list Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki

Re: [Ubuntu] Mismatch in binaryfulness. (arch) False != (files) True

exited with 1 I just wonder why I have this problem just ubuntugis/bionic branch. I am using *exactly the same* procedure [1] for xenial branch. Here package is accepted by Launchpad without any problem. Ma [1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/DebianUbuntuPackaging#GitworkflowusingtheGRASSspecifi

Re: [Ubuntu] Mismatch in binaryfulness. (arch) False != (files) True

Hi, st 13. 6. 2018 v 23:33 odesílatel Martin Landa napsal: I tried to compare files which are send to Launchpad (bionic vs xenial), I found small difference which can be related: diff -u grass_7.4.1-1~bionic1_source.changes grass_7.4.1-1~xenial1_source.changes

Re: [Ubuntu] Mismatch in binaryfulness. (arch) False != (files) True

Hi, st 13. 6. 2018 v 23:42 odesílatel Martin Landa napsal: > _amd64.buildinfo file is generated just for bionic and not for xenial. Ma I created package for bionic once more and before uploading removed from grass_7.4.1-1~bionic2_source.changes any records about grass_7.4.1-1~bionic2_am

Re: [Ubuntu] Mismatch in binaryfulness. (arch) False != (files) True

I need to remove buildinfo files manually from source.changes file otherwise it's refused by Launchpad. Martin -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa ___ UbuntuGIS mailing list Ubuntu@lists.o

[Ubuntu] GDAL 2.3 plans?

Hi, are there any plans to introduce GDAL 2.3 into Ubuntu Expr/Unstable? At least for Bionic. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa ___ UbuntuGIS mailing list Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org https

Re: [Ubuntu] QGis 3 on UbuntuGIS PPA

disaster. it's planned, AFAIK, when QGIS3 become LTR (Feb 2019). Ma -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa ___ UbuntuGIS mailing list Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listin

Re: [Ubuntu] QGis 3 on UbuntuGIS PPA

ilable from Long-Term Repo will be 3.4.4. Maybe I misunderstood the roadmap, it can be. [1] https://www.qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/development/roadmap.html#release-schedule Martin -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/me

Re: [Ubuntu] Bionic updates

Hi, po 19. 11. 2018 v 16:08 odesílatel Angelos Tzotsos napsal: > I have pushed some updates to experimental ppa for testing. great, I will test new packages on upcoming GIS.lab version 0.8: https://launchpad.net/~gislab-npo/+archive/ubuntu/development Thanks for hard work, Ma -- Mar

Re: [Ubuntu] Bionic updates

Hi, po 19. 11. 2018 v 16:55 odesílatel Martin Landa napsal: > great, I will test new packages on upcoming GIS.lab version 0.8: after some testing (and uploading GRASS 7.4.3) I would vote for pushing packages into Unstable PPA. Ma -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa h

[Ubuntu] ubuntugis expr full

more space or some cleanup is preferable? Thanks, Ma -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa ___ UbuntuGIS mailing list Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki

Re: [Ubuntu] ubuntugis expr full

Hi, st 26. 12. 2018 v 18:10 odesílatel Martin Landa napsal: > Should I ask for more space or some cleanup is preferable? Thanks, Ma I took liberty to ask for space increasing [1]. Ma [1] https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/677041 -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gw

Re: [Ubuntu] ubuntugis expr full

Hi, st 26. 12. 2018 v 20:22 odesílatel Angelos Tzotsos napsal: > > Since experimental is depending on Unstable, we can just delete packages > that exist in Unstable. right, anyway size increased meanwhile to 16GB. Ma -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gism

Re: [Ubuntu] Bionic updates

Hi, pá 1. 3. 2019 v 0:12 odesílatel Angelos Tzotsos napsal: > I have pushed some updates to experimental ppa for testing. great, thanks for your effort! > * QGIS 2.18.28 I took liberty to upload recent new QGIS LTR - 3.4.5 (which has been uploaded to Debian Expr few days ago). Ma --

Re: [Ubuntu] Bionic updates

Hi, pá 1. 3. 2019 v 19:40 odesílatel Angelos Tzotsos napsal: > I was planning to do that in 2 steps, first update Unstable, then do QGIS 3. I hope it's OK for you that I already uploaded. I was planning to do it anyway. Ma -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/La

Re: [Ubuntu] Bionic updates

Hi, pá 1. 3. 2019 v 19:41 odesílatel Martin Landa napsal: > > I was planning to do that in 2 steps, first update Unstable, then do QGIS 3. I would prefer to test directly QGIS3. There are plenty of users waiting to see QGIS3 in UbuntuGIS. Ma -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki

Re: [Ubuntu] Bionic updates

Hi, pá 1. 3. 2019 v 19:47 odesílatel Angelos Tzotsos napsal: > QGIS 3.x is still in experimental in Debian, lets do this in 2 steps > within a few days. personally I would do it in one step (also due to GIS.lab updates). But I will leave decision on you. Ma -- Martin Land

Re: [Ubuntu] Bionic updates

Hi, pá 1. 3. 2019 v 20:10 odesílatel Martin Landa napsal: > personally I would do it in one step (also due to GIS.lab updates). > But I will leave decision on you. Ma so fee free to replace already uploaded 3.4.5 package by 2.18.28. I will postpone my plans to upload also 3.4.5. packa

Re: [Ubuntu] Bionic updates

Hi, po 4. 3. 2019 v 15:59 odesílatel Angelos Tzotsos napsal: > QGIS 3.4.5 is now in experimental ppa thanks! Ma -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa ___ UbuntuGIS mailing list Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.

Re: [Ubuntu] Buggy QGis 3.4

u experiencing similar > issues? Could they somehow be related to the packaging? that's strange. QGIS 3.4 packages from ubuntugis-unstable are working well for me. Ma -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa ___

[Ubuntu] Pristine-tar couldn't checkout "qgis_3.4.6+dfsg.orig.tar.bz2"

-tar.GeutAmz0o0/recreatetarball) of length 530606080 bytes pristine-tar: Failed to reproduce original tarball. Please file a bug report. pristine-tar: failed to generate tarball Any idea what could be wrong. I pulled pristine-tar branch twice. No problems detected. Thanks, Ma -- Ma

Re: [Ubuntu] Pristine-tar couldn't checkout "qgis_3.4.6+dfsg.orig.tar.bz2"

g.tar.bz2": xdelta: expected from file (/tmp/pristine-tar.yAIviKRiKj/recreatetarball) of length 530606080 bytes I was building qgis 3.4.5 package yesterday on the same pc without any problem. Ma -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gism

Re: [Ubuntu] Pristine-tar couldn't checkout "qgis_3.4.6+dfsg.orig.tar.bz2"

Hi, so 23. 3. 2019 v 13:26 odesílatel Sebastiaan Couwenberg napsal: > You can get the orig tarball here while it lasts: thanks, Ma -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa ___ UbuntuGIS mailing l

Re: [Ubuntu] Bionic updates

Hi, út 16. 7. 2019 v 13:13 odesílatel Angelos Tzotsos napsal: > As a result of the OSGeoLive development, there is a list of updates in > experimental for Bionic: great, thanks for your work. Martin -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors

[Ubuntu] qgis 3.10.3: undefined reference to `openpty'

lsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/qgis/-/tree/ubuntu/bionic -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa ___ UbuntuGIS mailing list Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki

Re: [Ubuntu] qgis 3.10.3: undefined reference to `openpty'

Hi Angelos, st 18. 3. 2020 v 9:49 odesílatel Angelos Tzotsos napsal: > About Salsa, yes, I need to find some time to get used to the process I hope that some recipes from https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/DebianUbuntuPackaging could help. Martin -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gw

Re: [Ubuntu] qgis 3.10.3: undefined reference to `openpty'

Hi Angelos, st 18. 3. 2020 v 9:49 odesílatel Angelos Tzotsos napsal: > Are you using the UbuntuGIS unstable packages to build right now? you are right, using the UbuntuGIS unstable helped. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/la

[Ubuntu] cowbuilder fails for Ubuntu 20.04 Focal

: /var/cache/pbuilder/focal/aptcache/: No such directory E: debootstrap failed Any idea how to fix this? Thanks, Martin -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa ___ UbuntuGIS mailing list Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org

Re: [Ubuntu] cowbuilder fails for Ubuntu 20.04 Focal

s /var/cache/pbuilder/bionic/ aptcache martin@debian:~/git/pkg/grass$ ls /var/cache/pbuilder/xenial/ aptcache but not for focal. Martin [1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/DebianUbuntuPackaging#Configurationfile -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors

Re: [Ubuntu] cowbuilder fails for Ubuntu 20.04 Focal

Hi, so 2. 5. 2020 v 17:24 odesílatel Martin Landa napsal: > but not for focal. After creating the folder sudo mkdir -p /var/cache/pbuilder/focal/aptcache I am able to run cowbuilder. Great. Ma -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/la

Re: [Ubuntu] cowbuilder fails for Ubuntu 20.04 Focal

point I do not understand. Is it recommended to have a single aptcache used by more chroots (bionic, focal) or separated as defined at [1]. APTCACHE="/var/cache/pbuilder/$NAME/aptcache/" Martin [1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/DebianUbuntuPackaging#Configurationfile -- Martin Land

Re: [Ubuntu] cowbuilder fails for Ubuntu 20.04 Focal

Hi, so 2. 5. 2020 v 17:37 odesílatel Sebastiaan Couwenberg napsal: > I would remove the APTCACHE config from ~/.pbuilderrc and the done. Thanks for quick feedback. Ma -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/la

[Ubuntu] focal package naming

/+packages?field.name_filter=grass&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter= [2] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgdal-grass/3.0.4-1build1 -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa ___ UbuntuGIS

Re: [Ubuntu] focal package naming

Hi, so 9. 5. 2020 v 21:14 odesílatel Sebastiaan Couwenberg napsal: > Backport 3.0.4-2 (as 3.0.4-2~focal1) to have a higher version. thanks for quick feedback. Ma -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/la

[Ubuntu] UbuntuGIS GRASS 8 packaging

instead of `debian/8.0.0-1`? Thanks for feedback in advance, Martin [1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/grass/-/tags [2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/grass -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa

[Ubuntu] GRASS 8 in ubuntu-unstable

Dear all, currently GRASS 8 is available only in ubuntu-experimental. Is there any plan to upgrade the grass package in ubuntu-unstable to version 8? Thanks for feedback in advance. Martin -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa

Re: [Ubuntu] GRASS 8 in ubuntu-unstable

r testing in Google Colab (which is still based on Ubuntu 18.04). I hope it's fine. I am not planning to move to ubuntu-unstable. Martin -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa ___ UbuntuGIS maili

Re: [Ubuntu] GRASS 8 in ubuntu-unstable

Hi, st 8. 6. 2022 v 13:38 odesílatel Angelos Tzotsos napsal: > Thank for the feedback, I just moved the packages from experimental to > unstable (Focal and Jammy). Thanks. > We can now push grass 8.2.0 to experimental. Yes, I can do it later today. Martin -- Martin L

[Ubuntu] failed pipeline

-- Martin Landa https://geomatics.fsv.cvut.cz/en/employees/martin-landa/ http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa ___ UbuntuGIS mailing list Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki

<    1   2