I'd like to bring something up again. Why are there so many smooth
engine skins in the proposed internal package? I feel as though we
only need one, anyway, so we might as well move one of the eye-candy
external skins to the internal skin proposal list. Ubuntulooks
Quicksilver, for
Done, https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/44990
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Hello,
do you have a .deb to test your artwork ??
Étienne.
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 11:50 +0200, Michiel Sikma wrote:
I'd like to bring something up again. Why are there so many smooth
engine skins in the proposed internal package? I feel as though we
only need one, anyway, so we might as well move one of the eye-candy
external skins to the
Hi all,
I made an SVG based on Viper550's work; played around a bit adding
more gradients and also a bit of a 3d effect. I added it to the wiki
page, even though it is not really a new design (thought it would be
better there than posting it here).
Oh, and in my pic the reflection is not
On Mon, 2006-15-05 at 23:55 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
The logo does not have to be perfect, it just has to look *great*
given the medium.
Seems to me that the medium dictates that we must keep the palette
simple considering the color range. An extremely dense palette also
permits the
On May 16, 2006, at 6:09 PM, Troy James Sobotka wrote:
On Mon, 2006-15-05 at 23:55 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
The logo does not have to be perfect, it just has to look *great*
given the medium.
Seems to me that the medium dictates that we must keep the palette
simple considering the
Mark, can you explain me why usplash artwork are flatten ? Also how to
get a usable .so ? I wrote a Makefile that handle quite well the build
and install process of splashes. Is it wrong ?
Is there any doc about making usplash theme ? UsplashCustomizationHowto
seems to have problems according to
This might seem out of place, but I really would appreciate some
direction on where the current leadership is going with the art.
One centralized Wiki page for Dapper would be wonderful. It might
already exist, but it certainly isn't the easiest thing to find.
What I am hoping for is
On 5/16/06, Michiel Sikma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to bring something up again. Why are there so many smooth
engine skins in the proposed internal package? I feel as though we
only need one, anyway, so we might as well move one of the eye-candy
Please note the 'Real' meaning of
On 5/15/06, Guilherme Salgado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:30:05AM +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
Who wrote:
What next? I couldn't see how to make a poll on Launchpad...
Who
If you go there, NOT logged in, it states..
log in as
Who wrote:
On 5/16/06, Michiel Sikma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to bring something up again. Why are there so many smooth
engine skins in the proposed internal package? I feel as though we
only need one, anyway, so we might as well move one of the eye-candy
Please note the 'Real'
Hello!
There are a few icons that are displayed on the default desktop. I'll
list them here:
Applications
Mozilla-Firefox
Evolution
Log out
Show Desktop
Trash
My idea is to theme some of these icons orange. Here is a suggestion
for each of these:
Applications - Already Orange
Mozilla Firefox -
If you refer to the new orange arrows instead of green, he's already
done that for 0.2 and 0.3
Viper550
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
No, I'm referring to the round icons a la nautilus with human iconset.
God bless,
Lukas
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 16:19 -0400, Viper550 wrote:
If you refer to the new orange arrows instead of green, he's already
done that for 0.2 and 0.3
Viper550
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 22:26, Lukas Sabota wrote:
No, I'm referring to the round icons a la nautilus with human iconset.
Try setting use small icons in the Firefox toolbar. Human only provides
16x16 versions of these arrows, my script wants 24x24 for a normal toolbar.
There's a huge list of
On 5/16/06, Lukas Sabota [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Ubuntu-artwork does not seem to provide any scalable (SVG) icons. This
makes the Stretch Icon button in nautilus pretty much useless. I have
filed a bug here:
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-artwork/+bug/34399
Are
Hello,
Ok the page is a bit of a nightmare to scroll thru. Is there any way to
set up a tabled thumbnail of the splashes?
You're right. I did it for my usplash cause i can host them.
That's so crazy to see so many propositions in so few times. Just open
the correct wikipage and let's go :)
On wo, 2006-05-17 at 00:23 +0200, Étienne Bersac wrote:
I don't start with a 640x400 image ??? Do you mean that usplash use
640x400 picture scaled up to 640x480 screen (if vga16fb is used) ? I
will test and tell you.
Sort-of: vga16fb is a 640x400 screen with a 4:3 aspect ratio. So you
indeed
On May 17, 2006, at 12:13 AM, Troy James Sobotka wrote:
Building on this momentum, anyone want to helm building a cohesive
wiki
page with the desktop contributions (thumbnails) splash and usplash
thumbnails?
Nice work guys.
A little warning though -- some of those 640x400 images will NOT
FYI, if you don't already know this, start with a 640x480 image and
scale it down to 640x400. That should get you the correct aspect
ratio.
Hehe, I had this discussion already with someone else :-)
You only loose information when doing it as you suggest. The correct
way is to
Hello,
1) Obtain an optimum 16 color palette via careful scrunching.
2) Import the palette via Gimp's palette tool.
3) Scuttle the palette entries around in accordance with
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/USplashCustomizationHowto?highlight=%28usplash%
29
4) Re-work the working image down to a 16
Hello,
Here is how I do it...the first part probably makes no sense, but I
am used to doing it that way :-)
1) Create a basic 640x480 pic with the correct branding, etc. as vector.
2) scale that down to 640x400
3) add extra highlights, glow and shadows as appropriate
4) save a pic as
This is a great discussion. I'm always interested in other's
approaches...
--- Ken Wimer said: ---
1) Create a basic 640x480 pic with the correct branding, etc. as vector.
2) scale that down to 640x400
3) add extra highlights, glow and shadows as appropriate
4) save a pic as 24bit png
5) change
On Wed, 2006-17-05 at 02:44 +0200, Étienne Bersac wrote:
I followed youre step to manually implement Gimp palette drag'n'drop ;)
[attached], That may have set up the right palette, but that didn't make
my splash viewable ! I wonder why do is see nothing at the screen.
Yep. Like I said.
Currently, the default About me icon is a little tiny white guy. This
does not scale well, and looks very poor on the Lock Screen dialog.
I've attached a (quick) image that could replace the little white guy:
the Ubuntu logo. This is a 64x64 png image, unlike the 32x32 white guy
that is
OK: ubuntu-logo-light.640x400.png (640x400, 4-bit colormap,
non-interlaced, 98.5 %).
OK: usplash-artwork.png (640x400, 4-bit colormap, non-interlaced,
98.5%).
That is the output I just tested on a couple of pngs that are
failing in good old pngtobogl conversion. Looks to me that
four bits is a
Ok... for those of you frantically trying to make the
best Ubuntu optimized usplash with Gimp, you will need
to use imagemagick's convert function to avoid
the pgn being stuck with an extra transparency color
index.
Save your palette optimized image into a bmp format.
Use imagemagick's convert
I took some initiative and thumbnailed all of the work
at the usplash proposal portion of the Wiki.
You can find it here:
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Usplash/DapperPropositions
Hopefully we can arrange a like Wiki page for wallpapers,
splashes, etc.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
29 matches
Mail list logo
