On Monday 14 December 2009 07:54:28 pm Oliver Scholtz 1 wrote: > Am Montag, den 14.12.2009, 18:31 +0100 schrieb Thorsten Wilms: > > On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 14:15 +0100, Oliver Scholtz 1 wrote: > > > I created a new Metacity-proposal for Lucid. Unfortunately I did a > > > mistake (don't know why, because I gone to the Lucid-page and pushed on > > > "create new concept page") and created a Concept-Page in the > > > Karmic-rubric. But the Concept is for Lucid. Somebody can correct it? > > > > You can move a page by chosing "Rename page" from the "More Actions" > > menu (I guess it was a command line user who named that action ;) > > > > Already done for this page: > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Lucid/Humancity > > Ha ha ... surely :) > > I read that maybe Lucid want have no more a Metacity, because they have > a goal to do something similar what google-chrome haves. It's for the > tabbing... But a Metacity is always needed. Don't matter if it's Gnome > 2.xx or Gnome 3.xx. So I go on ... :)
We will be using metacity for some windows but the client side window decorations for most. We haven't looked into how this all will work yet. -- Ken -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
