Andreas Nilsson wrote:
I agree that alternative fonts in the interface might look spiffy, but
readability comes first together with coverage in a massive amount of
languages.
Beside the point of the language there is one more think has to be taken
into account and that is the smoothing.
On Nov 8, 2007 3:17 AM, Tiago Souza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are fonts within our scope? Can we change it? Will we change it? I'm
wondering why we are not discussing it..
I don't know if we can change it but we can surely use the liberation
fonts by Red Hat that are nice and free:
Tiago Souza wrote:
Are fonts within our scope? Can we change it? Will we change it? I'm
wondering why we are not discussing it..
Cheers!
I agree. I generally find the fonts in Ubuntu a little too big and
spindly. I really like the typography in this
Andrew Laignel wrote:
Tiago Souza wrote:
Are fonts within our scope? Can we change it? Will we change it? I'm
wondering why we are not discussing it..
Cheers!
I agree. I generally find the fonts in Ubuntu a little too big and
spindly. I really like the typography in this
I don't know if we can change it but we can surely use the liberation
fonts by Red Hat that are nice and free:
https://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/113889
Apparently the license used by Red Hat adds some exceptions to the GPL,
which caused them to be
I don't post much, but I have been reading for the last several months.
My computer can barely just run all the new visual effects and such
that were added to Gutsy, and all this talk of adding processor
intensive window managers worries me. How will I be able to install
the newest version
Are fonts within our scope? Can we change it? Will we change it? I'm
wondering why we are not discussing it..
Cheers!
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
