I know it's only for KDE - I said so...
Thanks, I'll try pitivi.
2008/9/27 Michael Stephenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/9/27 Joshua Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are only seven movie editors I can find. Cinelerra may be
professional, but it has nowhere near the potential that the easy
Il giorno sab, 27/09/2008 alle 17.05 -0400, Vadim Peretokin ha scritto:
There is a fork of Cinerella, called Linerella or something like that.
But yeah, movie editing for the average human on Linux is out of
reach, unless you're a Hollywood movie studio. But I don't even want
to know the
this is because of some legal issues.
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 12:31 +0200, Giuseppe Pennisi wrote:
Il giorno sab, 27/09/2008 alle 17.05 -0400, Vadim Peretokin ha scritto:
There is a fork of Cinerella, called Linerella or something like that.
But yeah, movie editing for the average human on
Il giorno dom, 28/09/2008 alle 12.41 +0200, Adam ha scritto:
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 12:31 +0200, Giuseppe Pennisi wrote:
Il giorno sab, 27/09/2008 alle 17.05 -0400, Vadim Peretokin ha scritto:
There is a fork of Cinerella, called Linerella or something like that.
But yeah, movie
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 13:18 +0200, Giuseppe Pennisi wrote:
Il giorno dom, 28/09/2008 alle 12.41 +0200, Adam ha scritto:
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 12:31 +0200, Giuseppe Pennisi wrote:
Il giorno sab, 27/09/2008 alle 17.05 -0400, Vadim Peretokin ha scritto:
There is a fork of Cinerella,
Il giorno dom, 28/09/2008 alle 13.30 +0200, Adam ha scritto:
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 13:18 +0200, Giuseppe Pennisi wrote:
Il giorno dom, 28/09/2008 alle 12.41 +0200, Adam ha scritto:
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 12:31 +0200, Giuseppe Pennisi wrote:
Il giorno sab, 27/09/2008 alle 17.05
There are only seven movie editors I can find. Cinelerra may be
professional, but it has nowhere near the potential that the easy interface
of Windows Movie Maker had. The only thing that is Gnome-based and that
seems to have a nice interface is Kino, and it *doesn't even have a
timeline. *How are
There is a fork of Cinerella, called Linerella or something like that.
But yeah, movie editing for the average human on Linux is out of reach,
unless you're a Hollywood movie studio. But I don't even want to know the
prices on that software.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
2008/9/27 Joshua Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are only seven movie editors I can find. Cinelerra may be
professional, but it has nowhere near the potential that the easy interface
of Windows Movie Maker had. The only thing that is Gnome-based and that
seems to have a nice interface is Kino,
FYI Kino is KDE based, not Gnome based.
Disregard that, I am an idiot the K always threw me.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Il giorno gio, 25/09/2008 alle 16.14 +0100, José Luis ha scritto:
So we need:
-Vid editor
-Third party office support(PS, After Effects, AutoCad..)
I agree totally. This items are more important to compete with closed
source OS.
For the rest, I think is more important make something that is
So we need:
-Vid editor
-Third party office support(PS, After Effects, AutoCad..)
And a pretty interface, of course!
i agree we need a good video editor, like imovie, and openoffice is
great but they have so dumb mistakes (for example if you would use a lot
of shortcuts like
Hi!
I will assume that the lack of replies to my last post means that
there's nothing to add or change there now ;)
On to the next point!
= Why Audience and Message? =
The presentation, like any act, conveys a message even if you don't care
about it. That would be to take a risk instead of an
So we are targetting the same people as Apple. That's a good thing, coz
we can't be wrong if we and the apple engineers agree.
Why do the current young web-savvy professionals use Mac?
Mac gives them what they want in a gorgeus box.
We can give them the same (or better)... for free, and that's
14 matches
Mail list logo
