On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 09:07 -0400, George Kendros wrote:
The only place where I differ is the tabs. I think it looks weird
having the active tab look 'pressed in'. The active tab is supposed to
be above the inactive tabs so it create a strange look when it's
below.
It is supposed to? Says
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 9:07 AM, George Kendros [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I'm pretty much in complete agreement with you. I think that pic of the
calculator with one button pressed in looks great. The only place where I
differ is the tabs. I think it looks weird having the active tab look
I have tried the theme.
The reason I say tabs 'should' look a certain way is because tabs are
emulating an actual physical object. Thorsten, I understand your point about
consistent UI metaphors and it makes a lot of sense. The only thing I'm
saying is that you first need to disassociate the UI
-- Original E-Mail -
Yeah, I tried the actual theme out as well. The problem is that it's a
pixmap theme so unless you really like that color (which I don't) it doesn't
really work for you. It also had a few glitches, that you outlined above,
which seem common in many
I'm new to this list, but I was just wondering what consideration was being
given to different theme engines and if any development is being put into a
specific theme engine?
I was just wondering because I was looking at the official page of the
Nodoka engine and was pretty impressed with the
'CLASSIC' seems okay, but 'MODERN' is a bit painful on the eyes that they
have.
Anyway, it's about the end theme, not the engine that matters :\
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
The end theme is usually a function of the engine (unless you go with
pixmaps).
Look at the specific widget examples further down the page, especially the
scrollbars. They're better than anything we have right now IMO.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 5:29 PM, George Kendros
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm new to this list, but I was just wondering what consideration was being
given to different theme engines and if any development is being put into a
specific theme engine?
I was just wondering because I was looking at
2008/8/11 Who [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 5:29 PM, George Kendros
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm new to this list, but I was just wondering what consideration was being
given to different theme engines and if any development is being put into a
specific theme engine?
I was just
@ Andrea
If I (or someone else) where to follow your suggestion and show desired
engine functionality on a widget factory mock-up, where would be a good
place to post that?
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
2008/8/11 George Kendros [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
@ Andrea
If I (or someone else) where to follow your suggestion and show desired
engine functionality on a widget factory mock-up, where would be a good
place to post that?
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
Or maybe even a google doc. No registration needed if you have a good
account.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
I like the way the gtkButton looks on this theme/mockup;
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Intrepid/Intrepid_Ibex_GTK_proposal?action=AttachFiledo=viewtarget=test2.png
The regular button really doesn't look that different from murrine. What I
think looks good is the pressed in look of the
Oh I agree. That is a nice, unique look.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
You can get that theme from here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Intrepid/Intrepid_Ibex_GTK_proposal?action=AttachFiledo=viewtarget=Human-2.tar.gz
The buttons, the combo boxes, tabs, and the general colour look nice.
However the Applications menu doesn't quite work - the downsized
Yeah, I tried the actual theme out as well. The problem is that it's a
pixmap theme so unless you really like that color (which I don't) it doesn't
really work for you. It also had a few glitches, that you outlined above,
which seem common in many pixmap themes.
That's why I think it would be
2008/8/11 George Kendros [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
@ Andrea
If I (or someone else) where to follow your suggestion and show desired
engine functionality on a widget factory mock-up, where would be a good
place to post that?
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
17 matches
Mail list logo
