On 6 March 2010 00:59, David Zondlo dzon...@gmail.com wrote:
While I am super used to buttons-on-right I think I'm the only one who is
digging the change to the left. Google chrome is still messing with me since
its not decorated by metacity. Might have to go back to FF :P
~Dave
--
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 08:36 +, Luke Benstead wrote:
The bug is the ordering of the minimize and maximize buttons which
have been swapped for no obvious reason, (...)
It's rather that there is no obvious reason to have Minimize, Maximize,
Close, as Minimize and Close have more in common.
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Thorsten Wilms t...@freenet.de wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 08:36 +, Luke Benstead wrote:
The bug is the ordering of the minimize and maximize buttons which
have been swapped for no obvious reason, (...)
It's rather that there is no obvious reason to
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Thorsten Wilms t...@freenet.de wrote:
What now feels to be an eternity ago, Mark Shuttleworth in a Community
Council session, http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/09/02/%
23ubuntu-meeting.html:
22:09 in terms of audience, i think we have to aim for young
Changing for the sake of changing is absolutely absurd. Although I am
(hopefully) sure that there was a reasoning behind the change, it seems
without rationale.
I agree, let's pick an audience and serve them well. Everyone is impossible
and certainly (too) ambitious.
Changing sides AND order is
Hi!
The new fad in UI design is white space. Even though GNOME has very
thick padding inside windows, we seem to be behind on this one :)
A big problem with GNOME's look right now, and this seems to be the case
no matter what theme one looks at, is the huge number of lines scattered
about the
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Dylan McCall dylanmcc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
The new fad in UI design is white space. Even though GNOME has very
thick padding inside windows, we seem to be behind on this one :)
A big problem with GNOME's look right now, and this seems to be the case
no
