** Description changed:
[Impact]
- * Ubuntu Server 20.04 LTS (focal) is a good basis for running a Tor
+ * Ubuntu Server 20.04 LTS (focal) is a good basis for running a Tor
bridge, helping censored users to access the Tor network. A setup guide
for Ubuntu is provided by the Tor project
You have been subscribed to a public bug by wurstsemmel (wurstsemmel-lp):
[Impact]
* Ubuntu Server 20.04 LTS (focal) is a good basis for running a Tor
bridge, helping censored users to access the Tor network. A setup guide
for Ubuntu is provided by the Tor project [1]. The Tor bridge requires
> also backporting debugedit sounds like the correct thing to do
I don't think we can backport debugedit for i386 currently, since
debugedit's i386 build depends on debhelper which depends on debugedit's
i386 build.
Maybe we can do a build without the backports pocket in a PPA, then
binary-copy
> *If* want to fix this in bionic and focal, a full SRU will be
required
agreed, and that would require its own [SRU] bug separate from this
[BPO] bug
> I'll take this on, I have some spare cycles today this afternoon.
@teward did you get a chance to prepare this? I didn't see it in the
upload
Just a note that this needs a sponsor to review and upload it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962743
Title:
[BPO] freeipmi/1.6.9-2 from Jammy to Focal
To manage
** Changed in: simplestreams (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951601
Title:
[BPO]
I just realized I probably misunderstood, as this is fixing bugs in the
*previous* backport for this, which (if that's the case) is totally fine
to backport as-is.
Can you just clarify if that's correct, and also if any of this
backport, or the last backport, fixes bugs in the official focal
It's slightly concerning that -backports may be getting used here just
for fixes? The concern is that bug fixes should be done as SRU so that
everyone gets the bug fixes. The backports pocket generally should be
limited to mainly pulling new features/functionality back; stuff that
would be
** Changed in: simplestreams (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951601
Title:
[BPO]
