You have been subscribed to a public bug by Phil Wyett (kathenas):

[Impact]

 * Provides many fixes and enhancements.
 * As the Debian Maintainer (DM) of this package for many years, this is a 
service I provide in Debian.
 * Low impact. Backporting works well in Debian and the track history is sound.

[Scope]

 * Backport from mantic - 23.10.
 * Backport from future development releases where reliability/stability allows.

 * Backport to jammy - 22.04 LTS.

 * No backports to non-LTS versions - Ever. Backports are for long term
users running LTS only.

 * Why a backport and not SRU? The amount of changes that benefit the
user. Risk?[1]

[Other Info]
 
 * I am the Debian Maintainer (DM) of this package and have been for many years 
and will provide fixes and/or updates.
 * I am used to strictly managing the upgrade path.
 * Build has been tested and is available at: 
https://launchpad.net/~kathenas/+archive/ubuntu/rednotebook

[1] A python package is less dangerous to backport than others and the
possible risks are low.

** Affects: rednotebook (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New


** Tags: ubuntu-backports
-- 
 [BPO] rednotebook/2.29.6+ds-2 from mantic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2027961
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu 
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

Reply via email to