[Bug 96586] Re: Backport Inkscape to 0.45.1 for the Feisty release

2007-06-08 Thread Bryce Harrington
Okay, I've added 'feisty-backports' to the bug, so hopefully they'll take care of it from there. Closing as fixed. ** Also affects: feisty-backports (upstream) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Changed in: inkscape (Ubuntu Feisty) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed

[Bug 120939] Re: X11 warnings after upgrade when moving windows

2007-07-11 Thread Bryce Harrington
By chance do you have any flash running in the firefox windows when this occurs? If so, then it may be related to bug 14911. In any case, if you have encountered this after upgrading to feisty from a prior version, can you please re-run the xorg configuration tool, to see if it is simply some

[Bug 117013] Re: Ubuntu fails to start with fglrx on radeon x1300

2007-07-11 Thread Bryce Harrington
Feisty debs are available here: http://people.ubuntu.com/~bryce/Testing/fglrx-8.37.6-Feisty/ ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 96279 fglrx proprietary driver update for (X1300 e.q.) ** Summary changed: - Ubuntu fails to start with fglrx on radeon x1300 + Backport of fglrx to

[Bug 117013] Re: Backport of fglrx to Feisty needed for radeon x1300 support

2007-07-11 Thread Bryce Harrington
Assigning to feisty-backports. A gutsy version of fglrx that fixes radeon x1300 has been uploaded and confirmed to fix. Jeff, Chris, and acron, please verify the feisty debs I've provided solve the issue, and also if you could, please work directly with the feisty-backport team to get this added

[Bug 121163] Re: Support for Nvidia GeForce 8400M, 8300, 8600 Gfx chipset

2007-07-12 Thread Bryce Harrington
Subscribing feisty-backports. The xserver-xorg-video-nv 2.1.2 driver adds support for a wide range of new nVidia drivers including the 8xxx series. ** Also affects: feisty-backports (upstream) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Support for Nvidia GeForce 8400M,8300,8600 Gfx chipset

[Bug 121163] Re: Support for Nvidia GeForce 8400M, 8300, 8600 Gfx chipset

2007-07-13 Thread Bryce Harrington
.debs are available for testing here: http://people.ubuntu.com/~bryce/Testing/nv_2.1.2-Feisty/ http://people.ubuntu.com/~bryce/Testing/nv_2.1.2-Gutsy/ -- Support for Nvidia GeForce 8400M,8300,8600 Gfx chipset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121163 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 120939] Re: X11 warnings after upgrade when moving windows

2007-07-14 Thread Bryce Harrington
Hmm, not sure what is causing this, but since it occurs with kde but not gnome, it sounds like it's an issue somewhere in kde. Refiling into kdebase... hopefully someone there can help pin it down. ** Changed in: kdebase (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: xorg = kdebase Importance: Undecided = Low

[Bug 96586] Re: Correct multiple inkscape issues in Feisty (SRU and Backport)

2007-07-25 Thread Bryce Harrington
Scott, the original request was to get 0.45.1 available in Feisty, as it contains a large number of bug fixes. SRU is only going to accept the three crash bugs, and says the remainder must be done as backports. The description was edited to only list those three bugs, however I believe many of

[Bug 264462] Re: Radeon Driver fails to load on 2 Sep daily [ATI HD3870]

2008-10-15 Thread Bryce Harrington
Alex suggests http://www.botchco.com/alex/xorg/150_pref_high_fb.diff or http://www.botchco.com/alex/xorg/150_pref_high_ref.diff should do the trick for this bug. -- Radeon Driver fails to load on 2 Sep daily [ATI HD3870] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264462 You received this bug notification

[Bug 264462] Re: Radeon Driver fails to load on 2 Sep daily [ATI HD3870]

2008-10-17 Thread Bryce Harrington
Sorry, I started doing some packaging on them but I got sidetracked on other issues. Basically, the patches need to be modified to apply to our driver and then verified that they solve the issue before they go in. -- Radeon Driver fails to load on 2 Sep daily [ATI HD3870]

[Bug 264462] Re: Radeon Driver fails to load on 2 Sep daily [ATI HD3870]

2008-10-17 Thread Bryce Harrington
I've built 3 sets of packages, one for each patch and one with both patches together: http://bryceharrington.org/ubuntu/AtiBug264462/ prefhighfb prefhighref prefhighboth Please test each of these and see which one(s) solve the issue if any. The patches themselves look fine to me and low risk,

[Bug 264462] Re: Radeon Driver fails to load on 2 Sep daily [ATI HD3870]

2008-10-23 Thread Bryce Harrington
We're still waiting on a response from upstream, but it's gotten too late for intrepid so I'm closing the intrepid task (an SRU post-release could still be done). ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: Triaged = Won't Fix -- Radeon Driver fails to load on 2 Sep

[Bug 264462] Re: [HD3870] Driver fails to load on 2 Sep daily

2009-01-02 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Summary changed: - Radeon Driver fails to load on 2 Sep daily [ATI HD3870] + [HD3870] Driver fails to load on 2 Sep daily ** Summary changed: - [HD3870] Driver fails to load on 2 Sep daily + [RV 6xx HD 3870] Driver fails to load on 2 Sep daily -- [RV 6xx HD 3870] Driver fails to load on 2

[Bug 264462] Re: [RV 6xx HD 3870] Driver fails to load on 2 Sep daily

2009-01-17 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Description changed: The xserver-xorg-video-ati driver version that is part of the 02 Sep daily build (Ubuntu i386) fails to start the display during the boot sequence for either the live desktop or direct install modes, resulting in a blank X display. The text terminals are

[Bug 264462] Re: [RV 6xx HD 3870] Driver fails to load on 2 Sep daily

2009-01-29 Thread Bryce Harrington
radeontool in Jaunty* can be used to assist in debugging this issue. After installing it, you run it like this: radeontool regmatch '*' regdump_good.txt radeontool regmatch '*' regdump_broke.txt Run it two times. Once when you have a working screen (for any driver), and once in the

[Bug 254468] Re: MASTER: momentary video garbage upon drawing new objects (particularly in KDE)

2009-08-12 Thread Bryce Harrington
Should no longer be a problem on karmic since the patch that caused the original problem was dropped long ago. ** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released ** Tags added: intel kubuntu ** Tags removed: epicfail intell -- MASTER: momentary video garbage upon

[Bug 353126] Re: Compiz / vnc screen refresh with nvidia-restricted driver/VirtualBox/ATI fglrx driver using X.org

2011-10-06 Thread Bryce Harrington
This bug still exists, but we are tracking it at bug #772873; this report is a dupe of that one. I would set this as a dupe, but because this one has so many dupes on it, launchpad chokes. Anyway, subscribe to bug #772873 if you want to follow it. The short story is, it seems to be a bug in

[Bug 1130964] [NEW] Please backport task 2.1.2-0ubuntu1 (universe) from raring

2013-02-20 Thread Bryce Harrington
Public bug reported: Please backport task 2.1.2-0ubuntu1 (universe) from raring to quantal. Reason for the backport: Updates task to latest release for quantal users. This release includes two minor bug fixes and documentation updates. Testing: Mark off items

[Bug 1130964] Re: Please backport task 2.1.2-0ubuntu1 (universe) from raring

2013-02-20 Thread Bryce Harrington
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1130970 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1130970 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1130970 Please backport task 2.1.2-0ubuntu1 (universe) from raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters,

[Bug 1130970] [NEW] Please backport task 2.1.2-0ubuntu1 (universe) from raring

2013-02-20 Thread Bryce Harrington
Public bug reported: Please backport task 2.1.2-0ubuntu1 (universe) from raring to precise, quantal. Reason for the backport: The 2.1 series provides new features not included in precise's 2.0 series, most notably being User Defined Attributes. It also includes many bug

[Bug 1177548] [NEW] Please backport freeciv 2.3.2-1 (universe) from quantal

2013-05-07 Thread Bryce Harrington
Public bug reported: Please backport freeciv 2.3.2-1 (universe) from quantal to precise. Reason for the backport: 2.3.2 brings improved AI interaction, better documentation, and a slew of bug fixes. Ubuntu ships freeciv 2.3.2-1 in quantal, raring, and (currently)

[Bug 1179429] [NEW] Please backport lgeneral 1.2.3 (universe) from raring

2013-05-13 Thread Bryce Harrington
Public bug reported: Please backport lgeneral 1.2.3-1 (universe) from raring to precise. Reason for the backport: The 1.2.x series offers a number of benefits over precise's 1.1.1: More aggressive and smarter AI, rule changes for level bombers to make them more

[Bug 1179429] Re: Please backport lgeneral 1.2.3 (universe) from raring

2013-05-13 Thread Bryce Harrington
** Attachment added: ChangeLog https://bugs.launchpad.net/precise-backports/+bug/1179429/+attachment/3675192/+files/ChangeLog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is subscribed to Precise Backports.

[Bug 1179429] Re: Please backport lgeneral 1.2.3 (universe) from raring

2013-05-20 Thread Bryce Harrington
I have installed quantal on my laptop and played through the first scenario of the PG campaign (downloaded from http://sourceforge.net/projects/lgeneral/?source=dlp and installed as per the scenario's README). Works fine on quantal. ** Changed in: precise-backports Status: Incomplete =

[Bug 1183154] [NEW] Please backport freecol (0.10.5+dfsg-1) (universe) from quantal

2013-05-22 Thread Bryce Harrington
Public bug reported: Please backport freecol (0.10.5+dfsg-1) (universe) from quantal to precise. Reason for the backport: 0.10.5 brings significantly smarter AI, improved graphics, several new mods, various new configuration options, and a ton of bug fixes. This is the

Re: Proposal: sunset the backports pockets

2021-07-19 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:25:48AM -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > So, yes, I will block a so-called "improvement" when it comes down to > quitting > vs exhausting all other options, because, in my opinion, quitting is not an > option. Totally get what you're saying Erich, and exactly right