Public bug reported:
Version was released 11/13/2008.
** Affects: intrepid-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Please upgrade eqonomize to 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298093
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters,
** Also affects: eqonomize (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: eqonomize
--
Please upgrade eqonomize to 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298093
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for
Public bug reported:
When I upgraded to xfce 4.4.3, I was only able to do a partial upgrade.
I could not update xfdesktop4-data because it would break a dependency
with xfdesktop4. I attached a png file to show this.
** Affects: intrepid-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Attachment added: Aptitude screenshot of problem
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20411270/xfdesktop-data-upgrade.png
--
xfdesktop4 left out of xfce backports - causes partial upgrade warning
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307812
You received this bug notification because you are a member
This is related to the upgrade in #307569
--
xfdesktop4 left out of xfce backports - causes partial upgrade warning
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307812
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports.
--
I'm on intrepid Xubuntu amd64 and firefox crashes after about 8 seconds
with this plugin.
--
Please backport flashplugin-nonfree to Intrepid (at least for amd64)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310061
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the
This is the error I get on the console:
*** e = [Exception... Component returned failure code: 0x80570016
(NS_ERROR_XPC_GS_RETURNED_FAILURE) [nsIJSCID.getService] nsresult:
0x80570016 (NS_ERROR_XPC_GS_RETURNED_FAILURE) location: JS frame ::
chrome://browser/content/utilityOverlay.js ::
Savvas Radevic wrote:
After removing Realplayer and purging the old flash, it works fine.
Didn't it purge the old flash package when you installed it?
No, it didn't. I'm thinking that may be because it was a generated file
instead of an installed file.
--
Please backport
Savvas Radevic wrote:
No, it didn't. I'm thinking that may be because it was a generated file
instead of an installed file.
OK, that's normal, sorry :)
So that's done, what's left to check?
BTW, the 64 bit version seems a lot more stable. I ran it for about 4
hours straight last
2.5.4 was released in Jaunty. Should this bug be modified to reflect
that?
--
Please backport Pidgin 2.5.3-0ubuntu1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315760
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports.
--
I've already upgraded to Jaunty, so I no longer have a need for this,
but maybe others would.
--
Please upgrade eqonomize to 0.6
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/298093
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 125986 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 125986
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
--
7.04 upgrade failed: installArchives() failed at flashplugin
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 122442 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122442
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 122442
Memleak in Sun Java 6 on ubuntu feisty
--
Java6 hangs Firefox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/126194
You received this bug notification because you
The Pidgin Developers now maintain a PPA with backported versions:
https://launchpad.net/~pidgin-developers/+archive/ppa
These are not supported by the backporting projects.
--
Please backport Pidgin 2.5.3-0ubuntu1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315760
You received this bug notification
I'm not sure, but you can contact the pidgin developers and ask them.
Contact info should be on the Overview page on the PPA link.
Alessio Spinus Moscatello wrote:
Thank you for the tip! But the PPA version for Hardy was modified to
work with FUSA or is still broken?
--
Please backport
Public bug reported:
Packages built fine in PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~zend-framework/+archive/ppa/+packages
No Source Changes
** Affects: hardy-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: intrepid-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
**
Confirmed the backport installs on Karmic and a zend-framework website
works with it.
** Changed in: karmic-backports
Status: New = Confirmed
** Summary changed:
- Please backport zend-framework from Lucid
+ Please backport zend-framework 1.9.6-0ubuntu1 from Lucid
--
Please backport
Thank you for reporting this to Ubuntu. I have opened a task with the
Jaunty Backports project to facilitate completion of this request.
Therefore I am closing the Ubuntu task. Please report any other issues
you may find.
** Also affects: jaunty-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status:
Reopening since there were several security fixes in 1.9.7
** Summary changed:
- Please backport zend-framework 1.9.6-0ubuntu1 from Lucid
+ Please backport zend-framework 1.9.7-0ubuntu1 from Lucid
** Changed in: karmic-backports
Status: Fix Released = New
--
Please backport
Confirmed that the build works on karmic
** Changed in: karmic-backports
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Please backport zend-framework 1.9.7-0ubuntu1 from Lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488633
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backports Testing
@clayg
Firefox 3.6 will be backported to hardy sometime soon. Until then, you can get
it here:
https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/firefox-stable
--
Please backport firefox-3.5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395167
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Thank you, we're aware of this and working on backporting Firefox 3.6.
Please use the firefox-stable PPA as I noted above if you need it sooner.
On 03/10/2010 01:48 PM, hhfeng wrote:
This request becomes more important as Firefox 3.0 will reach its end of
life cycle on March 30, 2010.
--
Public bug reported:
This is the first version with xulrunner 2.0 support, but the backport
will just use xulrunner 1.9.2. Hopefully we can get some testing at
least of the newer version in Maverick to make sure nothing regressed.
** Affects: maverick-backports
Importance: Undecided
** Attachment added: Maverick pbuilder log
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/maverick-backports/+bug/667803/+attachment/1714436/+files/last_operation.log
--
Please backport conkeror 0.9.3+git101015-1ubuntu1 to maverick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667803
You received this bug notification
The new version installs and runs on maverick.
--
Please backport conkeror 0.9.3+git101015-1ubuntu1 to maverick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667803
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to maverick-backports.
--
Marking maverick-backports task incomplete pending response.
** Changed in: maverick-backports
Status: New = Incomplete
--
Please sync Griffith 0.12-1 from Debian (unstable) to Maverick - updated
dependency
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/607896
You received this bug notification
Jaunty is now EOL, so closing the backports task.
** Changed in: jaunty-backports
Status: New = Invalid
** Summary changed:
- Backport Gwyddion 2.21-1 to hardy, jaunty, karmic, lucid, maverick
+ Backport Gwyddion 2.21-1 to hardy, karmic, lucid, maverick
--
Backport Gwyddion 2.21-1 to
** Summary changed:
- Please backport vIm 7.3 for Maverick
+ Please backport vim 7.3 for Maverick
--
Please backport vim 7.3 for Maverick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661218
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
This package was missing from Lucid, see bug #532232 for the history. This
builds in my PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~micahg/+archive/ppa/+sourcepub/1391449/+listing-archive-extra
I just make sure it runs before confirming this.
** Affects: lucid-backports
Importance:
Clementine is not in the regular maverick archive, hence this bug is
invalid. Backports bugs should be filed against the appropriate
-backports project.
** Also affects: maverick-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: clementine (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed =
Thank you for reporting this to Ubuntu. Since this bug only affects a
backported package, I have opened a bug task in the appropriate Ubuntu
backport project for you. I am only marking the Ubuntu task Invalid.
Please report any other issues you may find.
** Also affects: karmic-backports
Maverick was indeed upgraded to 5.1.1, so I'm marking this Fix Released.
I opened a lucid-backports task for lucid as this wouldn't qualify for a
stable release update. Please follow the backport request procedure
here and supply any additional information needed:
Please file a new bug for this and reference this bug # if it's related.
** Changed in: xchat (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports.
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu. Jaunty reached EOL on October 23,
2010.
Please see this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.
** Changed in: mayavi2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
** Changed in: unbound (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: unbound (Ubuntu Maverick)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is a direct subscriber.
Debdiffs look good, thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/788818
Title:
Assertion failure when unbound generates an empty error reply in
response to a query
--
Thank you for your interest in Ubuntu backports. One of the requirements for
backports is that the package builds, installs, and runs in the desired
release. I see a confirmation of building, but not of installing and running.
Another requirement is that the rdepends are tested with the
Backports are handled outside the regular Ubuntu bug tracking, so I
added a backports task and am therefore closing the Ubuntu task.
** Also affects: natty-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: openjdk-7 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this
Thank you for requesting this backport. Ubuntu backports are generally
requested to pull new features into stable releases. php5 will receive
security updates from the Ubuntu security team when appropriate to fix open
vulnerabilities. In fact, 11.04 has already received one such update:
Since this is a backport request, I opened a task in the appropriate
backport project. I am therefore closing the Ubuntu distro task.
** Also affects: maverick-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: libvpx (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received
Thank you for requesting this backport. I have moved this bug to the
lucid-backports project. However, due to the rules of backports, we
must allow for upgrades to not introduce regressions, so to backport
this to Lucid, it would have to be backported to maverick and natty as
well until maverick
For those that will want to grab the 2 debs, here's the link to the page
that will have the debs once they're built:
https://launchpad.net/~micahg/+archive/ppa/+sourcepub/2038591/+listing-
archive-extra
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which
I've uploaded packages for oneiric of workrave 1.9.4-2 to my Backports
PPA (ppa:micahg/ppa) which should build in 6-8 hours. Please test that
these packages install and run.
** Summary changed:
- missing Workrave in Ubuntu 11.10
+ Please backport workrave 1.9.4-2 to oneiric
--
You received
That's because i386 didn't build yet. It's scheduled to start in 4
hours.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877074
Title:
Please backport workrave 1.9.4-2 to
Also, there are no rdepends except a suggests by med-tools.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877074
Title:
Please backport workrave 1.9.4-2 to oneiric
To manage
Setting to confirmed based on comment #16 that it installs and runs and
that it built in my PPA.
** Changed in: oneiric-backports
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 848117 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848117
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 848117
Backport clamav 0.97.2 from natty-updates to hardy, lucid, and maverick
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Thank you for requesting this backport. I've set this to incomplete
pending the upload of tracker 0.12.7-1 to precise. Once that is
uploaded, you can reset this to New. The requirement for a backport is
that it builds, installs, and runs in the targeted release. Please let
us know if this is
Thank you for requesting this backport. Firefox will soon be updated in
Lucid to the rapid release version through the main archive. In the
mean time, you can get the latest stable release at ppa:mozillateam
/firefox-stable. Therefore, I am marking this bug invalid.
** Changed in:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 848117 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848117
This has already been fixed from bug #848117.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 848117
Backport clamav 0.97.2 from natty-updates to hardy, lucid, and maverick
--
You received this bug
This has already been fixed from bug #848117.
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734186
Title:
please
Moving to ubuntu/aptitude
** Project changed: lucid-backports = aptitude (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795602
Title:
Please SRU aptitude 0.6.3-3.2
To
Since this will be fixed in the main archive, I'm marking the backports
task invalid.
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 602113 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602113
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 602113
Please Backport NetBeans 6.9
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 533549 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533549
Marking this as a dupe of bug 533549 since I just uploaded a fix to
proposed.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 533549
ln: creating symbolic link `./yaml-mode.el': File exists
--
You
According to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643938, it
would seem that bognor-regis would need to be rebuilt against the new
tracker to use it. However, since the old version is there and it
should be parallel installable, this should in theory be fine. Also,
bognor-regis is
Since there are override targets (i.e. override_dh_install) in
debian/rules, you'll need to remove those and revert to the old style
targets since debhelper is 7.0.50~.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
That's fine, but does tracker 0.12.7-1 build/install/run on oneiric?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865907
Title:
Please backport tracker to Oneiric
To manage
Please also note the latest ubuntu-dev-tools is also available in Debian
unstable.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899655
Title:
please backport drush 4.5-4 from
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/900244
Title:
Please backport openssl
To
Thank you for requesting this backport. It's not true that anything
less than 0.9.8r breaks PCI compliance. It just breaks automated PCI
compliance testing. The Ubuntu security team regularly backports
patches for OpenSSL to keep the version in Lucid patched for security
vulnerabilities. Also,
This seems fine except it hasn't built on armel yet in precise, let's
wait for it to build there before going forward with this. Please reset
to Confirmed once it's built on armel in precise.
** Changed in: oneiric-backports
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification
lucid-backports only has 2.6.1, if you want 2.6.2 on hardy, you'll end
up with 2.6.4-2ubuntu2.6 from natty, but this must be backported to
hardy, lucid, and maverick. If this is what you wish, let me know, and
I'll prepare packages for you to test.
--
You received this bug notification because
Backports ACK, reporter confirmed it builds/installs/runs on the
targetted release
** Changed in: oneiric-backports
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: oneiric-backports
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Since we don't have this package in lucid-backports, I'm moving this to
abiword in Ubuntu. Is this reproducible and are there steps we can take
to reproduce this?
** Project changed: lucid-backports = abiword (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Please backport puppet 2.7.1-1ubuntu3.2 (main) from oneiric-updates to
hardy, lucid, maverick, natty.
Reason for the backport:
Per Bug #315506, hardy's puppet is useless and someone is requesting a newer
puppet as well. Glenn Aaldering offered to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 910024 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/910024
Sorry, I forgot about this. I filed a new bug with all the tasks and a
checklist for what to test. Therefore, I'm duping this bug against bug
910024. Packages are in ppa:micahg/ppa
** This bug has been
Public bug reported:
Please backport facter 1.5.6-2ubuntu2.3 (main) from lucid-updates to
hardy.
Reason for the backport:
Needed for backport of puppet (bug #910024). Package in ppa:micahg/ppa
Testing:
Mark off items in the checklist [X] as you test them, but
@Glenn
Can you please also test facter in bug #910032 as it's needed to backport the
oneiric puppet to hardy?
** Description changed:
Please backport puppet 2.7.1-1ubuntu3.2 (main) from oneiric-updates to
hardy, lucid, maverick, natty.
Reason for the backport:
lucid-natty has passed the build/install/run tests per Glenn Aaldering,
we'll work on hardy
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: maverick-backports
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: natty-backports
Status: New = In Progress
--
You
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: Fix Released = In Progress
** Changed in: maverick-backports
Status: Fix Released = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports.
** Summary changed:
- There is no oficial kbibtex package for Oneiric Ocelot
+ Please backport kbibtex 0.4-1 from precise to oneiric
** Package changed: kbibtex (Ubuntu) = oneiric-backports
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the
Thank you for requesting this backport. I've uploaded kbibtex to my
backports PPA for testing (ppa:micahg/ppa). The packages should be
available in a few hours for testing. Please check to see if the
package installs and runs on oneiric.
** Changed in: oneiric-backports
Status:
** Summary changed:
- Please backport Audacious 2.4 to 10.04
+ Please backport audacious 2.4.0-0ubuntu3 from maverick to lucid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740319
This backport will require an additional backport of libmowgli which will
require the following reverse dependencies to be tested:
Reverse-Depends
===
* atheme-services (for libmowgli1)
* audacious (for libmowgli1)
* audacious-dev (for
Please don't change the status without a comment. Also, only an Ubuntu
Backporter should be setting the Fix Committed state.
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: Fix Committed = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is
Can I assume that when you say it works fine that you installed it and
it ran?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927385
Title:
Please backport lives (1.6.1~ds1-1)
Backporters ACK, we have confirmation that it, builds/installs/runs fine
** Changed in: oneiric-backports
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
Public bug reported:
Please backport puppet 2.7.1-1ubuntu3.5 (main) from oneiric-updates to
lucid, maverick, natty.
Reason for the backport:
Security update for packages already in backports
Testing:
Mark off items in the checklist [X] as you test them, but
Glenn, I don't know if you're up for testing another round of backports,
but subscribing you just in case. Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947555
Title:
Thank you for your interest in Ubuntu Backports. Being that hardy has 13
months of life left, 5.3 broke a lot of applications, and Lucid (10.04
LTS) is available with 5.3.2 and another 3+ years of support, Im
marking this bug as won't fix. Please feel free to request other
backports in the
Thanks Glenn and Evan, backport approved!
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: New = Fix Committed
** Changed in: maverick-backports
Status: New = Fix Committed
** Changed in: natty-backports
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: Fix Committed = In Progress
** Changed in: maverick-backports
Status: Fix Committed = In Progress
** Changed in: natty-backports
Status: Fix Committed = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
@papachaotica
Do you no longer wish the backport? I can prepare packages for you to test if
you like.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677684
Title:
Please Backport
Thank you for requesting this backport. Generally, crashes should be
fixed as an SRU instead of a backport. Is it possible to cherry pick
the fix for this?
** Changed in: oneiric-backports
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Summary changed:
- Update to latest version for Sony Reader support
+ Please backport calibre 0.8.38+dfsg-1 from precise to oneiric
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
** Description changed:
I've just purchased a new Sony Reader Wi-Fi (PRS-T1). It syncs
beautifully via Calibre on my Windows laptop. However, Calibre on my
Ubuntu 11.10 desktop does not even pick it up. I've done a little
research and it seems all that needs to happen to get everything
Test packages uploaded to ppa:micahg/ppa and should be ready in a couple
hours. Please do the install and run tests once they're built.
** Description changed:
Please backport libaugeas-ruby 0.3.0-1.1ubuntu1 (main) from maverick to
lucid.
Reason for the backport:
Approved based on Fabrice's feedback.
** Changed in: oneiric-backports
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/960489
Title:
Please
10.10 is EOL in just under 3 weeks, it's time to upgrade :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Oneiric Backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/852603
Title:
hedgewars 0.9.17 can not engage in network play with
We can backport 4.4.0-1 from maverick or 4.4.3-0ubuntu3 from precise (precise
one either needs to wait 2.5 weeks or you need to backport for lucid-oneiric).
The following reverse dependencies will need to be tested (install/run) against
the backported package, is someone willing to commit to
Thanks Dominic for the testing, backport approved.
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is subscribed to lucid-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/958152
Title:
Public bug reported:
Please backport puppet 2.7.1-1ubuntu3.6 (main) from oneiric-security to
natty.
Reason for the backport:
Backport security update
Testing:
Mark off items in the checklist [X] as you test them, but please leave the
checklist so that
Glenn, would you be up for another round of smoke testing puppet
security backports? (install/run)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for natty-backports.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/978571
Title:
Please backport
Glenn, thanks for checking that, would you mind filing a bug for precise
then? I'm approving these backports then.
** Changed in: natty-backports
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: lucid-backports
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you
Marc, that wasn't the question, but we pushed out the backport ~11 hours
ago. I was worried about the issue with enabling the passenger module,
but Glenn said it affected precise as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the
In order to properly test a backport for PHP in Lucid, all of the
reverse dependencies (install/run test http://paste.ubuntu.com/930490/)
and build dependencies (build/install/run test
http://paste.ubuntu.com/930491/) would need to be tested (which is over
100 last time I checked) and I haven't
Just ignore the maverick stuff I guess.
** Summary changed:
- Please backport openldap 2.4.23-6ubuntu6.1 (main) from natty-updates
+ Please backport openldap 2.4.25-1.1ubuntu4.1 (main) from oneiric-updates
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters,
Adding a backports task as this is the direction this bug is going
instead of an SRU.
** Changed in: whois (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: In Progress = Invalid
** Changed in: whois (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Assignee: Chris J Arges (christopherarges) = (unassigned)
** Also affects:
We fixed this a while ago by superseding the Flash player in backports
with the security update, but Hardy Desktop is EOL now, so marking
invalid.
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
1 - 100 of 401 matches
Mail list logo
