[Bug 1472708] Re: should refuse to pack files with extended attributes

2015-07-08 Thread Alberto Diaz
upx does reject to pack a file with suid bit set, so should refuse to pack a file with some xattrs set. In particular, file capabilities are lost. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1472708] [NEW] should refuse to pack files with extended attributes

2015-07-08 Thread Alberto Diaz
Public bug reported: Extended attributes are lost when the file is upx packed. Example: getfattr /bin/ping -m . , output: # file: bin/ping security.capability then upx /bin/ping (no errors) getfattr /bin/ping -m . , output: (empty) ** Affects: upx-ucl (Ubuntu)

[Bug 995655] Re: add provides: sun-java6-jre

2012-05-08 Thread Alberto Diaz
In fact, this is the complete 'provides' list for sun-java6-jre (6.26): Provides: java-runtime, java-runtime-headless, java-virtual-machine, java2-runtime, java2-runtime-headless, java5-runtime, java5-runtime- headless, java6-runtime, java6-runtime-headless And this is the one for

[Bug 995651] Re: depend on oracle jre

2012-05-07 Thread Alberto Diaz
I'm not asking for add oracle java to the repos, but suggesting add oracle-j2re1.6 alternative so I can use a self-made jre (via java- package ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 995648] [NEW] depend on oracle jre

2012-05-06 Thread Alberto Diaz
Public bug reported: xplorer depends on openjdk-6-jre or sun-java6-jre, which is now oracle- j2re1.6 thanks to java-package. This third option could be added. ** Affects: jxplorer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 995651] [NEW] depend on oracle jre

2012-05-06 Thread Alberto Diaz
Public bug reported: Actually libreoffice depends on default-jre or gcj-jre or java-gcj-compat or openjdk-6-jre or openjdk-7-jre or sun-java5-jre or sun-java6-jre or java5-runtime or jre oracle-j2re1.6 could be added, as this is the former 'sun-java6-jre' built by java-package. ** Affects:

[Bug 995655] [NEW] add provides: sun-java6-jre

2012-05-06 Thread Alberto Diaz
Public bug reported: Actually I can create, from oracle .bin file, a .deb package which provides j2re1.6, java-browser-plugin, java-runtime, java-runtime- headless, java-virtual-machine, java2-runtime, java2-runtime-headless . I think that sun-java6-jre shoud be added to the list, for backwards

[Bug 596479] [NEW] clamav-freshclam: fais if log folder doesn't exist

2010-06-20 Thread Alberto Diaz
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: clamav-freshclam I have my /var/log on a ramdisk, so it's empty on reboot. If I try launch a manual update, freshclam ERROR: Can't open /var/log/clamav/freshclam.log in append mode (check permissions!). ERROR: Problem with internal logger

[Bug 596479] Re: clamav-freshclam: fais if log folder doesn't exist

2010-06-20 Thread Alberto Diaz
Storing logs on a tmpfs is a common practise on netboks with a SSD hd. I think some kind of wrapper could be used to recreate that directory on the fly -- clamav-freshclam: fais if log folder doesn't exist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596479 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 596479] [NEW] clamav-freshclam: fais if log folder doesn't exist

2010-06-20 Thread Alberto Diaz
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: clamav-freshclam I have my /var/log on a ramdisk, so it's empty on reboot. If I try launch a manual update, freshclam ERROR: Can't open /var/log/clamav/freshclam.log in append mode (check permissions!). ERROR: Problem with internal logger

[Bug 596479] Re: clamav-freshclam: fais if log folder doesn't exist

2010-06-20 Thread Alberto Diaz
Storing logs on a tmpfs is a common practise on netboks with a SSD hd. I think some kind of wrapper could be used to recreate that directory on the fly -- clamav-freshclam: fais if log folder doesn't exist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596479 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 182651] recompilation needed

2008-01-13 Thread Alberto Diaz
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: powermanagement-interface gdm-signal depends on an old version of glibc # ldd /usr/bin/gdm-signal /usr/bin/gdm-signal: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by /usr/bin/gdm-signal) ** Affects: powermanagement-interface (Ubuntu)