I'm afraid it's not practical to test on the newest Ubuntu in this
environment.
I'm absolutely convinced this is sshd related because if I take SSH
out of the equation, I cannot reproduce this at all, yet it does it
consistently when SSH is used to execute commands on the box as part
of the
Please install linux-crashdump package and reboot the machine. This will
enable core dump once the crash happens again.
I have done already and there was no core dump stored.
I have to get this fixed as it's causing us problems now. I'm going to
reinstall 10.04.02 32 bit and see if we still
The box messed about again yesterday. This time I was still able to
Ctrl+F1, Ctrl+F2 between terminals but it wouldn't accept any console
input. Nor would it respond to anything except pings on the LAN.
The keyboard Num/Caps/Scroll were flashing on the keyboard. On reset
there doesn't seem to
The box messed about again yesterday. This time I was still able to
Ctrl+F1, Ctrl+F2 between terminals but it wouldn't accept any console
input. Nor would it respond to anything except pings on the LAN.
The keyboard Num/Caps/Scroll were flashing on the keyboard. On reset
there doesn't seem to
I'm not at work this week, but I'll look at it when I get back. Touch
wood the extra RAM seems to have stopped it happening so far this
week.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.
I'm not at work this week, but I'll look at it when I get back. Touch
wood the extra RAM seems to have stopped it happening so far this
week.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726461
It's using the native DLM. However, it's the only node in the cluster.
Our live VM environment is Ubuntu server running KVM and OCFS2 and we
have 2 nodes. This box is just a backup server which takes an lvm2
snapshot of the OCFS2 filesystem, exports it over iSCSI and then as a
separate cluster
The OCFS2 filesystem is held on an OpenFiler box.
Cluster A is our live VM system with two nodes.
Cluster B is the backup system (the box in question).
Once a week, the OpenFiler box takes an LVM snapshot of the filesystem
normally used by cluster A and exports it as a new iSCSI target.
The
It's using the native DLM. However, it's the only node in the cluster.
Our live VM environment is Ubuntu server running KVM and OCFS2 and we
have 2 nodes. This box is just a backup server which takes an lvm2
snapshot of the OCFS2 filesystem, exports it over iSCSI and then as a
separate cluster
The OCFS2 filesystem is held on an OpenFiler box.
Cluster A is our live VM system with two nodes.
Cluster B is the backup system (the box in question).
Once a week, the OpenFiler box takes an LVM snapshot of the filesystem
normally used by cluster A and exports it as a new iSCSI target.
The
Has every instance of this bug involved ssh in the stack trace?
All the ones we've had to date. I initially thought it was apparmor
related because it mentions memory allocation etc but having removed
the packages and rebuilt initramfs I guess not.
If it happens again from now on, I'll make
Has every instance of this bug involved ssh in the stack trace?
All the ones we've had to date. I initially thought it was apparmor
related because it mentions memory allocation etc but having removed
the packages and rebuilt initramfs I guess not.
If it happens again from now on, I'll make
Public bug reported:
I have an HP ML115 running Lucid 64 bit.
It's got 4 2TB Samsung drives in a software RAID 5 and is used to backup
a bunch of servers (using rsnapshot), and also to mount a snapshot of
our SAN (using OCFS2) and copy virtual machine images over.
About once per week it hard
** Attachment added: Photo of the error output
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726461/+attachment/1876255/+files/IMG_20110228_101124.jpg
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu.
John,
I'm afraid I don't. Next time they go I'll grab a photo. I've disabled
and uninstalled AppArmor on them and added a further 4GB of RAM which
I'm hoping will work around it. Unfortunately they're serving 600 odd
workstations in a production environment so I don't want to do anything
that's
Public bug reported:
I have an HP ML115 running Lucid 64 bit.
It's got 4 2TB Samsung drives in a software RAID 5 and is used to backup
a bunch of servers (using rsnapshot), and also to mount a snapshot of
our SAN (using OCFS2) and copy virtual machine images over.
About once per week it hard
** Attachment added: Photo of the error output
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726461/+attachment/1876255/+files/IMG_20110228_101124.jpg
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726461
We think we're seeing this problem - very similar console output after
the crash on two HP DL320s servers running 10.04 64 bit. They've been
rock solid for 3 years running 8.04 but started crashing about once
every two weeks after the upgrade to 10.04.
--
You received this bug notification
Thanks for the pointer!
Alex
This email carries a disclaimer, a copy of which may be read at
http://learning.longhill.org.uk/disclaimer
--
slapd Too many open files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which
Thanks for the pointer!
Alex
This email carries a disclaimer, a copy of which may be read at
http://learning.longhill.org.uk/disclaimer
--
slapd Too many open files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I will do next time I do updates on that server. I don't want to take
the service down at the moment given the trouble we've had up until now.
Cheers
Alex
--
slapd Too many open files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I will do next time I do updates on that server. I don't want to take
the service down at the moment given the trouble we've had up until now.
Cheers
Alex
--
slapd Too many open files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
After a couple of days with:
ulimit -n 8192
in /etc/defaults/slapd we've not had a recurrence so I'll cautiously say
it looks like that solves it. It's really strange however that adding
the same limit via /etc/security/limits doesn't have the same effect?
--
slapd Too many open files
After a couple of days with:
ulimit -n 8192
in /etc/defaults/slapd we've not had a recurrence so I'll cautiously say
it looks like that solves it. It's really strange however that adding
the same limit via /etc/security/limits doesn't have the same effect?
--
slapd Too many open files
Ended up with adding
openldap soft nofile 8096
openldap hard nofile 8096
root soft nofile 8096
root hard nofile 8096
Rebooted. ulimit -a as root/openldap shows the change but still the
system goes unresponsive and I get the too many open files message.
Does anyone have anything else to suggest?
http://readlist.com/lists/openldap.org/openldap-software/2/12904.html
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378261
Both worth reading. I've tried adding a ulimit -n 8192 as suggested in
/etc/defaults/slapd so I'll see if that fixes things.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker
http://readlist.com/lists/openldap.org/openldap-software/2/12904.html
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378261
Both worth reading. I've tried adding a ulimit -n 8192 as suggested in
/etc/defaults/slapd so I'll see if that fixes things.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker
Ended up with adding
openldap soft nofile 8096
openldap hard nofile 8096
root soft nofile 8096
root hard nofile 8096
Rebooted. ulimit -a as root/openldap shows the change but still the
system goes unresponsive and I get the too many open files message.
Does anyone have anything else to suggest?
r...@core01:~# su openldap
r...@core01:~# ulimit -a
core file size (blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
scheduling priority (-e) 20
file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
pending signals (-i) 16382
max locked memory
slapd fell over again this morning. I'm trying editing
/etc/security/limits.conf
openldap hard nofile 8096
root hard nofile 8096
in conjunction with modified packages. I'll report back.
--
slapd Too many open files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632314
You received this bug notification
r...@core01:~# su openldap
r...@core01:~# ulimit -a
core file size (blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
scheduling priority (-e) 20
file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
pending signals (-i) 16382
max locked memory
slapd fell over again this morning. I'm trying editing
/etc/security/limits.conf
openldap hard nofile 8096
root hard nofile 8096
in conjunction with modified packages. I'll report back.
--
slapd Too many open files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632314
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
I reported this back in 2007 on Dapper and we've been rolling custom
debs since then.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap2.2/+bug/164303
Recently we've upgraded to lucid and are having the same issue again.
After a short period of time with heavy load, we
Sorry. Marked against the wrong package. It's 2.4.21
--
slapd Too many open files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap2.3 in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
I've built new packages with the debian.rules file patched as attached
and will test over the next couple of days.
** Patch added: debian_rules.patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap2.3/+bug/632314/+attachment/1553586/+files/debian_rules.patch
--
slapd Too many open files
Public bug reported:
I reported this back in 2007 on Dapper and we've been rolling custom
debs since then.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap2.2/+bug/164303
Recently we've upgraded to lucid and are having the same issue again.
After a short period of time with heavy load, we
Sorry. Marked against the wrong package. It's 2.4.21
--
slapd Too many open files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632314
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I've built new packages with the debian.rules file patched as attached
and will test over the next couple of days.
** Patch added: debian_rules.patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap2.3/+bug/632314/+attachment/1553586/+files/debian_rules.patch
--
slapd Too many open files
This still seems to be a problem in Lucid. We've moved from Hardy (no
problems automounting OCFS2 over iSCSI from there) but on Lucid the o2cb
service has never started the cluster when the machine is booted and
then as a consequence mountall-net fails to mount the drive.
--
mountall-net tries
Sorry if I've missed something but I'm still seeing this on Lucid:
$ apt-cache policy fcrackzip
fcrackzip:
Installed: 1.0-1
Candidate: 1.0-1
Version table:
*** 1.0-1 0
500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/universe Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
$ fcrackzip -u
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
Supermicro AOC-SASLP-MV8 card errors when creating software RAID array
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578212
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Hi Jeremy
I did already test the mainline build - see comment 3.
Cheers
Alex
** Tags removed: needs-upstream-testing
--
Supermicro AOC-SASLP-MV8 card errors when creating software RAID array
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578212
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I also built a custom 2.6.31 for Karmic (running Mythbuntu) and again so
far it's working fine.
--
Supermicro AOC-SASLP-MV8 card errors when creating software RAID array
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578212
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I build a custom 2.6.32-21 with that patch added and so far it's working
fine.
--
Supermicro AOC-SASLP-MV8 card errors when creating software RAID array
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578212
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
I have one of these cards - Marvell 88SE6480 chip I believe, BIOS
version is 3.1.0.15N.
I'm booting off a Lucid desktop usb boot drive. Also tried with rescue
mode on a Lucid 64 bit server usb key.
Machine boots off USB fine and I can partition 4 1TB SATA Hitachi drives
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48203570/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48203571/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48203572/Dependencies.txt
**
The mdadm command should of course have been:
mdadm --create /dev/md0 --raid-devices=2 --spare-devices=2 --level=1 /dev/sdb1
/dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 /dev/sde1
sda is the USB drive.
--
Supermicro AOC-SASLP-MV8 card errors when creating software RAID array
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578212
You
I've attached a 5th drive direct to the mainboards SATA controller and
installed Ubuntu there.
I then installed the latest 2.6.34rc7 mainline kernel from the PPA and
get the same behaviour, but some additonal info logged in dmesg:
[ 39.804042]
Yet more digging:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.scsi/57088
Apparently this patch fixes.
http://cache.gmane.org//gmane/linux/scsi/57145-001.bin
I'll attempt to test that - but it looks like this is being actively
handled upstream.
--
Supermicro AOC-SASLP-MV8 card errors when creating
This appears to be resolved in Lucid. Same hardware running Alpha 3
works fine.
--
[g33] [G33] AGNeovo 19 TFT Not Detected (No Screens Found)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462650
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
That's not the LD_PRELOAD thing in the libavg wiki? It's forever
catching me out:
https://www.libavg.de/wiki/index.php/Known_Linux_Installation_Issues#glibc_invalid_pointer
--
Please update libavg to 1.0.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474004
You received this bug notification because you are
Package needs to depend on libsdl1.2debian-pulseaudio.
Otherwise the audio thread inside libavg sits there consuming 100% cpu
solidly. Installing that package resolves this.
--
Please update libavg to 0.9.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474004
You received this bug notification because you
For info libavg 1.0 has been released in the interim - so perhaps it
would be best to aim to package that instead?
--
Please update libavg to 0.9.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/474004
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel
I installed Karmic and updated to date (28/10). Machine used to be on
Hardy.
When booting, Xsplash seems to load OK but then I'm presented with a
fast scrolling error message that I can't read. log shows no screens
found.
If I
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34541866/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34541867/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34541868/Dependencies.txt
**
Exact model is AG Neovo F-419.
--
AGNeovo 19 TFT Not Detected (No Screens Found)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462650
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I think I may have a similar issue. Same hardware works fine on Ubuntu
9.04 but booting Karmic Alpha 5 from a USB stick gives the attached Xorg
log.
Monitor is an AG Neovo F-419 LCD panel.
Graphics is an integrated G33 on an Intel DG31PR mainboard.
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log
Just tried with a different monitor (Belinea 17 LCD Panel) and it
worked fine first time. I guess it's something funky with the other
LCD...
--
No screen(s) found after updgrade to karmic alpha 5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429369
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Hi Scott / Siegfried
I can confirm that fixes it for me:
a...@alex-laptop:~$ python
Python 2.6.2 (release26-maint, Apr 19 2009, 01:56:41)
[GCC 4.3.3] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
import libavg
libavg
module 'libavg' from
FYI I tried this on a new install Jaunty updated to today and have the
same issue.
--
Can't import avg from libavg in Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363436
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Built custom debs from source with the fix from the OpenLDAP FAQ and
it's been running fine for a week now.. If anyone wants copies of our
debs I'm happy to let you have them, or full instructions to build your
own.
--
slapd Too many open files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164303
You received
It seems a change via Ulimit has only extended the period of time until
the problem recurrs.
** Changed in: openldap2.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = New
--
slapd Too many open files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164303
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Apologies. Issue has been fixed by increasing the number of open files
available to the user slapd runs as (rather than system wide) using
ulimit.
** Changed in: openldap2.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
slapd Too many open files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164303
You received
Public bug reported:
Server is an HP DL380 G4p, 2GB RAM, HP SCSI RAID controller.
OS: Dapper 6.06 LTS
OpenLDAP - slapd 2.2.26-5ubuntu2.2
When under significant load for extended periods of time, the LDAP
server ceases to respond to requests and logs the following in
/var/log/syslog:
Nov 19
64 matches
Mail list logo
