[Bug 247903] [NEW] Backport of package openarena requires backport of package openarena-data

2008-07-12 Thread Alexander Schulze
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openarena-data Affected source packages: openarena, openarena-data Affected release: hardy-backports Packages openarena and openarena-server were backported from intrepid to hardy-backports. Due to the dependency openarena-data (= 0.7.7) of these

[Bug 247903] Re: Backport of package openarena requires backport of package openarena-data

2008-07-12 Thread Alexander Schulze
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 247587 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247587 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 247587 openarena 0.7.7 backported to Hardy, but openarena-data 0.7.7 not backported -- Backport of package openarena requires backport of package

[Bug 246238] Re: warsow 0.42 backported to Hardy, but warsow-data 0.42 not backported

2008-07-10 Thread Alexander Schulze
** Also affects: hardy-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- warsow 0.42 backported to Hardy, but warsow-data 0.42 not backported https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246238 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 62308] Re: Permission Denied on nfs clients for only some files (includes patch)

2007-03-01 Thread Alexander Schulze
Our main fileserver here (which is based on dapper, but uses an edgy 2.6.17 kernel (version 2.6.17-11-server, backported to dapper) because we need NFSv4 with working krb5p support) is also hit by the problem. Using no_subtree_check as export option seems to work around the problem, but as I

[Bug 62308] Re: Permission Denied on nfs clients for only some files

2007-03-01 Thread Alexander Schulze
And, by the way, the fix mentioned above is included in the version of linux-source-2.6.17 that is in edgy-proposed (2.6.17-50.50). The newer (by one week, timestamp-wise) release of linux-source-2.6.17 in edgy- security (2.6.17-11.35) still contains the bug. The feisty kernel (2.6.20) is also

[Bug 62308] Re: Permission Denied on nfs clients for only some files

2007-03-01 Thread Alexander Schulze
Update: The version of 2.6.17 in edgy-proposed (linux- source-2.6.17-50.50) is *not fixed*. Although it should (IMHO) not cause the problems concerning permissions or stale NFS handles, it is missing another security fix (the one that originally caused the problem, from commit

[Bug 62308] Re: Permission Denied on nfs clients for only some files

2007-03-01 Thread Alexander Schulze
Oops... The patch in the attachment above obviously mixed up spaces and tabs... Use the --ignore-whitespace patch option when applying it. -- Permission Denied on nfs clients for only some files https://launchpad.net/bugs/62308 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 65631] Re: skge driver broken: invalid call to spin_unlock causes system crash

2006-10-13 Thread Alexander Schulze
As there seems to be no activity on this bug yet, I did a binary search in the bcollins/ubuntu-edgy git tree to find the problematic commit that introduced the problem. (I use the http interface on git.kernel.org to do this.) The situation is quite confusing. There are two files named skge.c in

[Bug 65631] Re: skge driver broken: invalid call to spin_unlock causes system crash

2006-10-12 Thread Alexander Schulze
Included hw spin-lock patch for skge.c and skge.h (based on 2.6.15-27.48 sources). Fix seems to correct the problems in our setup. ** Attachment added: Patch for skge driver version 1.5 (skge.c, skge.h) http://librarian.launchpad.net/4797263/patch.txt -- skge driver broken: invalid call to

[Bug 65631] Re: skge driver broken: invalid call to spin_unlock causes system crash

2006-10-12 Thread Alexander Schulze
I just verified that this defect in the skge driver is also present in the current git tree (URL given below) for edgy. It would be fine if it could be fixed in time, as releasing edgy with this bug would prevent installation of edgy on affected machines (without special workarounds), as accessing

[Bug 42264] Re: locale dependant segfault for dd

2006-08-16 Thread Alexander Schulze
As Laurent already mentioned, the problem disappears when adding #, c-format in the PO format of the file, in front of the problematic entry. I think this is the key to understand what is really going wrong here. It seems that first running msgunfmt, followed by msgfmt, does not necessarily yield

[Bug 42264] Re: locale dependant segfault for dd

2006-08-16 Thread Alexander Schulze
The problem in Bug 42264 seems to be related to the fact that gettext has problems identifying C printf strings as such when C99 specifiers like PRIuMAX are present, and requires a #, c-format hint in these cases. Note that running msgunfmt on a MO, followed by msgfmt on the intermediate PO, does