[Bug 247289] [NEW] wrong primitive type sizeof in gdb amd64

2008-07-10 Thread Alexey Mazurov
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdb Ubuntu 'Hardy' 8.04.1 gdb_6.8-1ubuntu2 gdb reports incorrect sizeof: $ gdb GNU gdb 6.8-debian Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software: you

[Bug 116621] Re: [feisty] serious performance regression in malloc

2007-05-25 Thread Alexey Mazurov
I think it should be considered for Feisty, because it is really serious performance degradation. It's not hypotetical, this bug showed up to me while I evaluating Ubuntu 7.04 server on x86_64 for our production environment, and it happens in real program. To demonstrate how bad it is look at

[Bug 116621] [feisty] serious performance regression in malloc

2007-05-24 Thread Alexey Mazurov
Public bug reported: Current malloc implementation in glibc-2.5 have serious problem with large number of free chunks, this bug reported to upstream http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4349 and fixed in current cvs and glibc-2.6 release. ** Affects: glibc (upstream)

[Bug 116621] Re: [feisty] serious performance regression in malloc

2007-05-24 Thread Alexey Mazurov
Here is a patch which fixes this bug extracted from current glibc cvs ** Attachment added: cvs-malloc.diff http://librarian.launchpad.net/7779358/cvs-malloc.diff -- [feisty] serious performance regression in malloc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116621 You received this bug notification

[Bug 116621] Re: [feisty] serious performance regression in malloc

2007-05-24 Thread Alexey Mazurov
** Description changed: Current malloc implementation in glibc-2.5 have serious problem with large number of free chunks, this bug reported to upstream http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4349 and fixed in current cvs and glibc-2.6 release. + This bug does not happens in edgy