[Bug 1704805] [NEW] All titlebars are corrupt

Public bug reported: After today's artful dist-ugprade, all titlebars are corrupted. The fonts show only squares. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.11.0-10.15-generic 4.11.8 Uname: Linux 4.11.0-10-generic x86_64

[Bug 1695141] Re: Recent update broke multiheaded sleep

Has there been any updates to this in either the Zesty security channel or Artful? It's a pretty serious regression. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1695141 Title: Recent update

[Bug 1695141] Re: Recent update broke multiheaded sleep

Confirmed that falling back to nvidia-graphics-drivers-375 375.39-0ubuntu5 fixes the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1695141 Title: Recent update broke multiheaded sleep To

[Bug 1695141] Re: Recent update broke multiheaded sleep

% uname -a Linux subdivisions 4.10.0-21-generic #23-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 28 16:14:22 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux FWIW, booting 4.10.0-20 hangs on boot so that's not a viable option. Also, setting Brightness>Turn screen off when inactive for: Never does not prevent Ubuntu from

[Bug 1695141] [NEW] Recent update broke multiheaded sleep

Public bug reported: I just dist-upgraded my Zesty machine and two things broke related to sleeping the displays. I have a 34" wide panel on the left and a 20" high resolution Dell on the right. Everything works fine until the displays sleep, say after a lockscreen has started. First, the

[Bug 1473178] Re: package python-pkg-resources 3.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1

** Changed in: python-setuptools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Barry Warsaw (barry) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1473178 Title: package python-pkg-resources 3.3-1ubun

[Bug 1473178] Re: package python-pkg-resources 3.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1

This looks like another case where pyclean (not py3clean) might be getting called by Python 3, which clearly won't work. Investigating. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1473178 Title:

[Bug 1679849] Re: vim FTBFS during a rebuild test for zesty

This builds for me locally, so I think this may have fixed itself. ** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679849 Title: vim FTBFS

[Bug 1679842] Re: python-requests-unixsocket FTBFS during a zesty test rebuild

This bug was fixed in the package python-requests-unixsocket - 0.1.5-3 --- python-requests-unixsocket (0.1.5-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload. [ Ondřej Nový ] * Bumped debhelper compat version to 10 [ Ondřej Kobližek ] * Non case sensitive url comparison in tests

[Bug 1569719] Re: package python3 3.5.1-3 failed to install/upgrade: pre-dependency problem - not installing python3

Setting up python3.5-minimal (3.5.1-10) ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.5/py_compile.py", line 6, in import importlib._bootstrap_external File "/usr/lib/python3.5/importlib/__init__.py", line 93 raise ValueError('{}.__loader__ is not set'.format(name))

[Bug 1679835] Re: pygobject-2 FTBFS on most arches during zesty test rebuild

% reverse-depends src:pygobject-2 Reverse-Recommends == * python-gtk2-doc (for python-gobject-2) * winswitch (for python-gobject-2) Reverse-Depends === * coccinelle(for python-gobject-2) * comitup

[Bug 1679842] Re: python-requests-unixsocket FTBFS during a zesty test rebuild

This is another case where a syncpackage of the unstable version discarding Ubuntu deltas should just fix things. I'll do that now. ** Changed in: python-requests-unixsocket (Ubuntu) Assignee: Chuck Short (zulcss) => Barry Warsaw (barry) -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1679837] Re: python-eventlet FTBFS on amd64 during zesty archive test rebuild

This bug was fixed in the package python-eventlet - 0.19.0-6 --- python-eventlet (0.19.0-6) unstable; urgency=medium * Removed non-deterministic test leading to FTBFS (Closes: #857893). -- Thomas Goirand Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:21:30 +0100 python-eventlet

[Bug 1679837] Re: python-eventlet FTBFS on amd64 during zesty archive test rebuild

** Changed in: python-eventlet (Ubuntu) Assignee: Corey Bryant (corey.bryant) => Barry Warsaw (barry) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679837 Title: python-eventlet FT

[Bug 1679837] Re: python-eventlet FTBFS on amd64 during zesty archive test rebuild

We should just sync python-eventlet from unstable. I know it's late in the cycle, but I believe 0.19.0-6 builds just fine (I tested the unstable's autopkgtests+build in a Zesty chroot). The differences ought to be benign, although the debhelper bump is not ideal (but I think probably not worth

[Bug 1679837] Re: python-eventlet FTBFS on amd64 during zesty archive test rebuild

Note that the 0.19.0-2ubuntu1 change from yakkety shows up in 0.19.0-3, so it appears to still be necessary (and no Ubuntu delta still needed). There's a new upstream which is obviously too late to consider, but that would be the time to see if the test skips are still worth it. -- You received

[Bug 1660216] Re: Package is obsolete and should be removed

IIRC, the a-x-i dependency on xapian1.3-bindings was because at the time only 1.3 support Python 3. I'll do some simple testing to see if we can just use python3-xapian. I suspect that will work just fine. ** Changed in: apt-xapian-index (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You

Re: [Bug 1678604] [NEW] package python3 3.5.1-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 127

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1605657 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1605657 On Apr 02, 2017, at 12:25 PM, virendra singh wrote: >afer removing python2.7 and installing python3 and making >/usr/bin/python soft link from /usr/bin/python3 i am receiving this >error. Please suggest

[Bug 1656474] Re: FTBFS on arm64: make[4]: *** [../../lisp/cedet/semantic/bovine/c-by.el] Segmentation fault (core dumped)

It also doesn't fail on bare metal. We have an arm64 porter box available to us and I did a test build w/dpkg-buildpackage in a chroot. No failure. I just also tried Debian unstable's Emacs 25.1 in my PPA and it fails in exactly the same way, so we can rule out any Ubuntu deltas, as expected.

[Bug 1658844] Re: most recent version does not install /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources/extern and /_vendor

Something from the description is confusing me: """ This is new install of lubuntu 14.04, installing python-pip Most recent python-pip version, installed 23 Jan 2017, does not install /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources/extern and

[Bug 1633331] Re: /usr/bin/pyclean fails with python3

Oh I missed this bit: "I'd assume this only triggers when the system is tweaked to run /usr/bin/python as python3? Does that match your case?" Yeah, don't do that! :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1633331] Re: /usr/bin/pyclean fails with python3

It doesn't really make to be running /usr/bin/pyclean with Python 3. That's why we have /usr/bin/py3clean which is part of python3-minimal. samba isn't even ported to Python 3, so why is it trying to run pyclean as Python 3? (samba is really the last thing keeping Python 2 on desktop, and it's

[Bug 1633331] Re: /usr/bin/pyclean fails with python3

*doesn't really make sense to be running -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/161 Title: /usr/bin/pyclean fails with python3 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1656474] Re: FTBFS on arm64: make[4]: *** [../../lisp/cedet/semantic/bovine/c-by.el] Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Building in my PPA with -O0 for arm64 fixes the problem, and I've uploaded 25.1+1-3ubuntu4 with this change, so hopefully that will clear it once it's approved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1656474] Re: FTBFS on arm64: make[4]: *** [../../lisp/cedet/semantic/bovine/c-by.el] Segmentation fault (core dumped)

** Changed in: emacs25 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Barry Warsaw (barry) ** Changed in: emacs25 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 1671572] Re: chrome-gnome-shell error popup when log in to non-GNOME

@jbicha: Sorry I didn't respond to this earlier. I've only seen this on Zesty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1671572 Title: chrome-gnome-shell error popup when log in to non-GNOME

[Bug 1672755] Re: SRU 1.0 tracking bug

The manual tests are described in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuImageUpdates With u-i 1.0 we have an autopkgtest test that performs an amd64 boot test. This is essentially equivalent (and therefore redundant) with the manual boot tests for SRU. Still, it's important to continue to manually boot

[Bug 1672755] Re: SRU 1.0 tracking bug

** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done-xenial verification-done-yakkety -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672755 Title: SRU 1.0 tracking bug To manage

[Bug 1671572] Re: chrome-gnome-shell error popup when log in to non-GNOME

I've started seeing this too on the machine which I have U-G installed (and enabled by default). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1671572 Title: chrome-gnome-shell error popup when log

[Bug 1673258] Re: Remove aptdaemon and drop or port its reverse-dependencies

Bugtasks added for revdep source packages. Hopefully I got them all. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1673258 Title: Remove aptdaemon and drop or port its reverse-dependencies To

[Bug 1673258] Re: Remove aptdaemon and drop or port its reverse-dependencies

Here are a few more relevant comments from IRC and email: barry: software-properties was already ported from aptdaemon to pk in Debian, we didn't push it into zesty since I don't think anyone checked if the driver code worked [16:51]

[Bug 1623856] Re: Scrolled Windows in update-manager are too small to read

Unfortunately this won't get fixed in aptdaemon. That package is unmaintained and does not build in Zesty any more because it uses obsolete APIs. This bug isn't worth fixing aptdaemon for and really, aptdaemon should eventually get removed from Ubuntu (it's already dropped in Debian). **

[Bug 1673258] [NEW] Remove aptdaemon and drop or port its reverse-dependencies

Public bug reported: aptdaemon is abandoned and unmaintained. It has already been dropped from Debian, but there are several reverse dependencies keeping it in Ubuntu. I will add bug tasks for each of those dependencies, which should be ported or dropped themselves. Then we can get rid of

[Bug 1672755] [NEW] SRU 1.0 tracking bug

amd64 model assertion. Ensure that the resulting image boots to 'press enter to configure' phase. [Regression Potential] * ubuntu-image may not produce a bootable image ** Affects: ubuntu-image (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Barry Warsaw (barry) Status: In Progress

[Bug 1665014] Re: SRU 0.15 tracking bug

@brian-murray: yes, thanks for requesting the details. Following the directions in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuImageUpdates for each of Yakkety and Xenial, I created the appropriate chroot, and installed ubuntu-image from -proposed. Then I used the command to build a bootable image, then

Re: [Bug 823254] Re: Port to python3

On Feb 22, 2017, at 08:03 PM, Bryan Quigley wrote: >Am I correct in assuming that this has been dropped and won't be ported? I believe that's correct, yes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1647204] Re: 1.8.0-2 FTBFS in zesty 17.04

Uploaded. Now we just have to get the archive admins to let it pass now that we've entered feature freeze, if that's even a good idea. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647204 Title:

[Bug 1666021] Re: zesty systemd-resolve timeout

I wonder if this is related to something I've seen since before the recent nm and systemd uploads. I have Chromium, Emacs, and Claws-Mail set up as startup apps. After a reboot, as soon as I login, these apps come up, but most of the tabs in Chromium cannot load. After some short amount of

[Bug 1666021] Re: zesty systemd-resolve timeout

I haven't seen this problem, but I don't suspend. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1666021 Title: zesty systemd-resolve timeout To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1647204] Re: 1.8.0-2 FTBFS in zesty 17.04

Testing LGTM. Thanks very much for the patch. I will sponsor it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647204 Title: 1.8.0-2 FTBFS in zesty 17.04 To manage notifications about

[Bug 1647204] Re: 1.8.0-2 FTBFS in zesty 17.04

So far so good: https://launchpad.net/~barry/+archive/ubuntu/experimental/+packages I'm going to test encryption with claws-mail in a VM. If that looks good too, I'll sponsor gpgme1.0 with your patch. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1647204] Re: 1.8.0-2 FTBFS in zesty 17.04

@panfaust: the patch looks pretty reasonable. I'll give it a try in my ppa, which builds all arches except powerpc and s390x. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647204 Title: 1.8.0-2

[Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

I will say that I've noticed a delay in having the network come up too, but that predates the new network-manage, and the latest systemd. It's been going on for a while now but I haven't managed to report a bug on it yet. I have several startup apps configured in my Gnome environment, including

[Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

Interesting. It worked and works for me. I tested the version in my PPA, both outside and inside a chroot (it was the inside-chroot that was previously broken). I just dist-upgraded my other Zesty machine and rebooted, and I am having no troubles resolving both IP and domain names both on my

[Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

I'll cherry pick back 98974a88 and 47c16359 now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647031 Title: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records To manage

[Bug 1665014] Re: SRU 0.15 tracking bug

** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1665014 Title: SRU 0.15 tracking bug To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1665014] Re: SRU 0.15 tracking bug

** Tags added: verification-done-yakkety -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1665014 Title: SRU 0.15 tracking bug To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1665014] [NEW] SRU 0.15 tracking bug

ugs in multi-volume gadget support that breaks single-volume specifications ** Affects: ubuntu-image (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Barry Warsaw (barry) Status: In Progress ** Affects: ubuntu-image (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: High Status: New ** Affects: ubuntu-im

[Bug 1655133] Re: SRU 0.14 tracking bug

** Changed in: ubuntu-image (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655133 Title: SRU 0.14 tracking bug To manage notifications about this bug go

Re: [Bug 1647204] Re: 1.8.0-2 FTBFS in zesty 17.04

On Jan 30, 2017, at 04:42 PM, Rik Mills wrote: >Ummm. If you are Ok with that FTBFS still on arm64 and armhf, then ok. Dang. Well, we'll have to deal with that next. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1647204] Re: 1.8.0-2 FTBFS in zesty 17.04

All looks good, so I'm uploading. Thanks very much for all the help! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647204 Title: 1.8.0-2 FTBFS in zesty 17.04 To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1647204] Re: 1.8.0-2 FTBFS in zesty 17.04

The PPA build is looking good. I'll check autopkgtests next and if that all looks good, I'll sponsor your debdiff. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647204 Title: 1.8.0-2

Re: [Bug 1647204] Re: 1.8.0-2 FTBFS in zesty 17.04

On Jan 30, 2017, at 09:42 AM, Rik Mills wrote: >** Patch added: "gpgme1.0_1.8.0-3ubuntu1.debdiff" > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpgme1.0/+bug/1647204/+attachment/4810708/+files/gpgme1.0_1.8.0-3ubuntu1.debdiff Thanks for the debdiff. LGTM; building in my PPA. If it passes,

[Bug 1647204] Re: 1.8.0-2 FTBFS in zesty 17.04

Thanks; I'm testing this in my own PPA now. If it succeeds, then I'm happy to upload this to Zesty. I have my own patch, which I'll attach here, but I'm also happy to sponsor a fix authored by you if you want to attach a debdiff to apply to the Zesty package. Or, if you are an Ubuntu developer,

[Bug 1647204] Re: 1.8.0-2 FTBFS in zesty 17.04

** Patch added: "lp1647204.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpgme1.0/+bug/1647204/+attachment/4809525/+files/lp1647204.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647204

[Bug 1623856] Re: Scrolled Windows in update-manager are too small to read

** No longer affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu Yakkety) ** Also affects: update-manager (Ubuntu Zesty) Importance: Low Assignee: Martin Wimpress (flexiondotorg) Status: Fix Released ** Also affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu Zesty) Importance: Low Assignee: Barry Warsaw (barry

[Bug 1655133] Re: SRU 0.14 tracking bug

Images built with both the Yakkety and Xenial versions pass the manual boot test with amd64 images. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655133 Title: SRU 0.14 tracking bug To manage

[Bug 1655133] Re: SRU 0.14 tracking bug

** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done-xenial verification-done-yakkety -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655133 Title: SRU 0.14 tracking bug To manage

[Bug 1623856] Re: Scrolled Windows in update-manager are too small to read

** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Assignee: Martin Wimpress (flexiondotorg) => Barry Warsaw (barry) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1623856 Title: Scrolled Windows in upd

[Bug 1655133] Re: SRU 0.14 tracking bug

I'm going to ditch the 0.13 release. 0.14 will have some fixes for the CI problems, so we'll supersede. ** Summary changed: - SRU 0.13 tracking bug + SRU 0.14 tracking bug -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1655735] Re: Incompatible libdevmapper 1.02.136 (2016-11-05) and kernel driver (unknown version).

I think we know almost the entire story now. See LP: #1656391 The one piece still missing is what changed. Very clearly the armhf container tests passed for several months, and then stopped working. My best guess is that they switched from using privileged containers to unprivileged

Re: [Bug 1647204] Re: 1.8.0-2 FTBFS in zesty 17.04

On Jan 13, 2017, at 09:26 PM, dkg wrote: >a hang during key generation is often due to lack of entropy on the >system. Can you ensure that the system isn't entropy-starved somehow? Oh, oh. I wonder if you're getting bitten by PEP 524 https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0524/ I don't believe

[Bug 1655735] Re: Incompatible libdevmapper 1.02.136 (2016-11-05) and kernel driver (unknown version).

LP: #1656391 And it's reproducible in an amd64 container run locally. So probably some change in the images or lxc. Maybe a new missing dependency? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1647204] Re: 1.8.0-2 FTBFS in zesty 17.04

On Jan 12, 2017, at 10:49 PM, Rik Mills wrote: >ppc64el hung for nearly that whole time, then for some bizarre reason >decided to complete. Not seen that before. That sure is weird. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1647204] Re: 1.8.0-2 FTBFS in zesty 17.04

On Jan 12, 2017, at 07:30 PM, Rik Mills wrote: >I will cancel the amd64 build when it hangs to make the buildlog >available, but will leave the other architectures to time out and >eventually be killed by the launchpad build system itself. Any results yet? Is it possible that the test suite

[Bug 1647204] Re: 1.8.0-2 FTBFS in zesty 17.04

This diff gets past the build failure: 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) debian/rules | 2 +- modified debian/rules @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ #!/usr/bin/make -f -export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all +export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all,-pie,+pic export QT_SELECT :=

[Bug 1647204] Re: 1.8.0-2 FTBFS in zesty 17.04

Did the debdiff get deleted? I've landed here because gpgme1.0 ftbfs is blocking claws-mail 3.14.1-2 promotion. I'm stuck (local build) on the Qt-related build crash. If I can fix that, I'll investigate the Python test suite hang. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

Re: [Bug 1655735] Re: Incompatible libdevmapper 1.02.136 (2016-11-05) and kernel driver (unknown version).

If you run `dmsetup ls` as non-root on amd64, you get an error that's close: % dmsetup ls /dev/mapper/control: open failed: Permission denied Failure to communicate with kernel device-mapper driver. Incompatible libdevmapper 1.02.136 (2016-11-05) and kernel driver (unknown version). Command

[Bug 1655735] Re: Incompatible libdevmapper 1.02.136 (2016-11-05) and kernel driver (unknown version).

Found this older bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/devmapper/+bug/105623 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655735 Title: Incompatible libdevmapper 1.02.136 (2016-11-05)

Re: [Bug 1655735] Re: Incompatible libdevmapper 1.02.136 (2016-11-05) and kernel driver (unknown version).

On Jan 11, 2017, at 08:10 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote: >Does the error go away if you boot a Xenial test kernel on this machine >and re-run the test? That will tell us if it is a kernel regression. We're a bit hardware starved atm, but trying to test this. -- You received this bug notification

Re: [Bug 1655133] Re: SRU 0.13 tracking bug

On Jan 11, 2017, at 06:31 PM, Brian Murray wrote: >https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac >/autopkgtest-zesty/zesty/armhf/u/ubuntu- >image/20170111_171929_431b1@/log.gz Most likely, it's an unrelated armhf regression. See LP: #1655735 If we

[Bug 1655735] Re: Incompatible libdevmapper 1.02.136 (2016-11-05) and kernel driver (unknown version).

On Jan 11, 2017, at 06:30 PM, Brad Figg wrote: >If, due to the nature of the issue you have encountered, you are unable >to run this command, please add a comment stating that fact and change >the bug status to 'Confirmed'. This is probably a regression only on armhf, so the logs generated on

[Bug 1655735] Re: Incompatible libdevmapper 1.02.136 (2016-11-05) and kernel driver (unknown version).

Removed unhelpful attachments and retagged to armhf. ** Also affects: lvm2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1655735] [NEW] Incompatible libdevmapper 1.02.136 (2016-11-05) and kernel driver (unknown version).

Public bug reported: There is a new Zesty regression on armhf, related to the autopkgtest for ubuntu-image. Here's a log of a recent run: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-zesty/zesty/armhf/u/ubuntu-

[Bug 1655474] [NEW] package sa-compile 3.4.1-6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 143

Public bug reported: Upgraded Yakkety to Zesty ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04 Package: sa-compile 3.4.1-6 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.9.0-11.12-generic 4.9.0 Uname: Linux 4.9.0-11-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl zcommon znvpair nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm

[Bug 1655133] [NEW] SRU 0.13 tracking bug

Public bug reported: New SRU tracking bug (with exception) for ubuntu-image 0.13 in Yakkety and Xenial. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuImageUpdates [Impact] ubuntu-image 0.13 is a maintenance release that fixes several bugs. [Test Case] Create an image using the official amd64 model

[Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647031 Title: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow

[Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

I've tested the PPA package and am satisfied that it restores CNAME resolution in schroots without any observed regression otherwise. I will upload it momentarily. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

I've uploaded a version with the reverts to my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~barry/+archive/ubuntu/experimental A local build looks promising, but I want to test it more before I upload it for real. Please do test the PPA version once it builds. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

tus: New => In Progress ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Barry Warsaw (barry) ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-17.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib

[Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

I will test the revert of this change until upstream fixes their bug. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Low => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647031 Title:

[Bug 1642723] Re: [MIR] python-webencodings

** Changed in: python-webencodings (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1642723 Title: [MIR] python-webencodings To manage notifications about

[Bug 1642723] Re: [MIR] python-webencodings

@mterry: Good catch, thanks. Uploading 0.5-2 to unstable now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1642723 Title: [MIR] python-webencodings To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1647031] Re: systemd-resolved’s 127.0.0.53 server does not follow CNAME records

I just hit this same problem, as described here: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2017-January/039623.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647031 Title:

[Bug 1460715] Re: MBR disk setup fails because sfdisk no longer accepts M as a valid unit

This probably affects u-i too. ** Also affects: ubuntu-image Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1460715 Title: MBR disk setup fails because

[Bug 1640523] Re: Parse integer-like YAML values as strings

This isn't a bug in ubuntu-image. The crash is coming from `snap prepare-image` and u-i just forwards that along because there's nothing more it can do. I opened a bugtask for snapd; here's how to reproduce it. 1. wget the model and the gadget snap from w-ondra's attachements 2. ubuntu-image

[Bug 1639965] Re: Alt doesn't always get forwarded to the application

Actually, I believe this is a unity7 bug since ubuntu-gnome-desktop does the right thing. ** Also affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: gnome-desktop (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1639937] Re: Cannot set Emacs key bindings

I'm moving this bug from gnome-desktop to unity because ubuntu-gnome- desktop does not seem to exhibit the same problem. It might still be a chromium issue though so keeping that. ** Also affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: gnome-desktop

[Bug 1639937] Re: Cannot set Emacs key bindings

@cmiller: ping; any progress on this bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1639937 Title: Cannot set Emacs key bindings To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1646608] Re: SRU 0.12 tracking bug

** Description changed: New SRU tracking bug (with exception) for ubuntu-image 0.12 in Yakkety and Xenial. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuImageUpdates [Impact] ubuntu-image 0.12 fixes quite a few usability and functionality bugs, and also updates the gadget.yaml parsing to

[Bug 1646608] Re: SRU 0.12 tracking bug

** Tags added: verification-done-yakkety -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646608 Title: SRU 0.12 tracking bug To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1646608] Re: SRU 0.12 tracking bug

** Description changed: New SRU tracking bug (with exception) for ubuntu-image 0.12 in Yakkety and Xenial. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuImageUpdates [Impact] ubuntu-image 0.12 fixes quite a few usability and functionality bugs, and also updates the gadget.yaml parsing to

[Bug 1646608] Re: SRU 0.12 tracking bug

** Description changed: New SRU tracking bug (with exception) for ubuntu-image 0.12 in Yakkety and Xenial. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuImageUpdates [Impact] ubuntu-image 0.12 fixes quite a few usability and functionality bugs, and also updates the gadget.yaml parsing to

[Bug 1646608] Re: SRU 0.12 tracking bug

** Changed in: ubuntu-image (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646608 Title: SRU 0.12 tracking bug To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1646608] [NEW] SRU 0.12 tracking bug

Public bug reported: New SRU tracking bug (with exception) for ubuntu-image 0.12 in Yakkety and Xenial. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuImageUpdates [Impact] ubuntu-image 0.12 fixes quite a few usability and functionality bugs, and also updates the gadget.yaml parsing to the latest spec. It

[Bug 1635258] Re: ubuntu-image should reserve 1-5% for root when creating filesystems

** Also affects: ubuntu-image Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: ubuntu-image (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1635258 Title: ubuntu-image

[Bug 1642723] [NEW] [MIR] python-webencodings

Public bug reported: python-webencodings is a new dependency for python-html5lib which itself is in main. [Availability] python-webencodings is already in zesty/universe [Rationale] It is a new dependency of python-html5lib, already in main [Security] There are no known security issues. As

[Bug 1639381] Re: SRU 0.11 tracking bug

** Changed in: ubuntu-image (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1639381 Title: SRU 0.11 tracking bug To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1640217] Re: python.so plugin fails to load under Zesty

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #844561 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844561 ** Also affects: claws-mail (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844561 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1640217] Re: python.so plugin fails to load under Zesty

I know what the problem is. Just trying to see if it's a bug in the Debian packaging or something weird only on Ubuntu. python-gtk2 is a missing required runtime dependency. ** Changed in: claws-mail (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: claws-mail (Ubuntu) Importance:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >