[Bug 1687095] Re: crm cluster health: NameError: global name 'parallax' is not defined

2018-07-23 Thread Casey & Gina
Ugh, this has been open for 14 months, so I guess not. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1687095 Title: crm cluster health: NameError: global name 'parallax' is not defined To manage no

[Bug 1687095] Re: crm cluster health: NameError: global name 'parallax' is not defined

2018-07-23 Thread Casey & Gina
Is any fix to this available? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1687095 Title: crm cluster health: NameError: global name 'parallax' is not defined To manage notifications about this bu

[Bug 1783164] Re: crmsh does not install parallax dependency, does not seem to be packaged

2018-07-23 Thread Casey & Gina
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1687095 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1687095 I can't use Ubuntu 18, how is it that the dependency for a package wasn't added when the package was added? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribe

[Bug 1783164] Re: crmsh does not install parallax dependency, does not seem to be packaged

2018-07-23 Thread Casey & Gina
It's Ubuntu 16.04. Yes, this is a duplicate of that bug. Is there any fix available? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1783164 Title: crmsh does not install parallax dependency, does n

[Bug 1783161] [NEW] Ruby processes get stuck on sched_yield busyloop

2018-07-23 Thread Casey & Gina
Public bug reported: Using the pcs package results in runaway ruby/pcsd processes that use 100% CPU (reported but ignored here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcs/+bug/1772998). Strace shows them stuck in a sched_yield() loop. After more digging this seems to a problem in the ruby int

[Bug 1783163] Re: crmsh does not install parallax dependency, does not seem to be packaged

2018-07-23 Thread Casey & Gina
This is an accidental duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/crmsh/+bug/1783164 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1783163 Title: crmsh does not install parallax dependenc

[Bug 1783164] [NEW] crmsh does not install parallax dependency, does not seem to be packaged

2018-07-23 Thread Casey & Gina
Public bug reported: Installed crmsh, tried an initial setup step: root@d-gp2-dbpgdvr1-1:~# crm cluster init d-gp2-dbpgdvr1-1 d-gp2-dbpgdvr1-2 d-gp2-dbpgdvr1-3 INFO: Initialize a new cluster INFO: Nodes: d-gp2-dbpgdvr1-1, d-gp2-dbpgdvr1-2, d-gp2-dbpgdvr1-3 Traceback (most recent call last): Fi

[Bug 1783163] [NEW] crmsh does not install parallax dependency, does not seem to be packaged

2018-07-23 Thread Casey & Gina
Public bug reported: Installed crmsh, tried an initial setup step: root@d-gp2-dbpgdvr1-1:~# crm cluster init d-gp2-dbpgdvr1-1 d-gp2-dbpgdvr1-2 d-gp2-dbpgdvr1-3 INFO: Initialize a new cluster INFO: Nodes: d-gp2-dbpgdvr1-1, d-gp2-dbpgdvr1-2, d-gp2-dbpgdvr1-3 Traceback (most recent call last): Fi

[Bug 1772998] Re: pcsd runaway processes use 100% CPU

2018-07-20 Thread Casey & Gina
Well, in case anybody ever looks at this bug, it may be a bug in the Ruby interpreter. This is fixed in Debian - https://bugs.debian.org /cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876377 It would be great to get this fix backported to Ubuntu 16, as otherwise pcs is pretty much unusable. I've tried installing th

[Bug 1781680] Re: fence_vmware_soap plugin's --ssl-insecure option does not work in this version

2018-07-13 Thread Casey & Gina
Nevermind my last comment, it was not intended for this bug, which is indeed a bug! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1781680 Title: fence_vmware_soap plugin's --ssl-insecure option does

[Bug 1781680] Re: fence_vmware_soap plugin's --ssl-insecure option does not work in this version

2018-07-13 Thread Casey & Gina
Sorry, I think this is not actually a bug. It turns out that what I was calling as ESX host is it's own vCenter. They are all able to talk to each other and thus any one can be used to manage the others from the web GUI, but this is not the case via the SOAP/REST APIs. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1781680] [NEW] fence_vmware_soap plugin's --ssl-insecure option does not work in this version

2018-07-13 Thread Casey & Gina
Public bug reported: The version of fence_vmware_soap included with fence-agents 4.0.22 has an --ssl-insecure option intended to make it work with hosts using self- signed SSL certificates, but it does not actually work. In the process of trying to figure out why I couldn't use a VMware ESX host

[Bug 1772998] Re: pcsd runaway processes use 100% CPU

2018-07-13 Thread Casey & Gina
Can somebody please respond? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1772998 Title: pcsd runaway processes use 100% CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 1772998] Re: pcsd runaway processes use 100% CPU

2018-06-20 Thread Casey & Gina
Any response on this? It is affecting a lot of servers where we are attempting to use it. I believe this would be remedied, as well as #1772098, by simply providing a newer version of PCS. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 1772998] [NEW] pcsd runaway processes use 100% CPU

2018-05-23 Thread Casey & Gina
Public bug reported: On multiple Ubuntu 16.04 servers where I have set up pacemaker clusters with pcs, there occasionally ends up being one or more processes consuming 100% of a single CPU core. Since this occurs on multiple nodes on a seemingly-random basis, it seems to be a problem with the ver

[Bug 1772096] Re: fence_vmware_soap is not working after installation of fence-agents

2018-05-22 Thread Casey & Gina
Does this mean that you don't consider this to be a bug with the packaging? Shouldn't all dependencies required to make the package work be installed? I'm not sure what "suggestions" means - I just thought that if I installed a package it should not install binaries that don't work due to some mi

[Bug 1772096] Re: fence_vmware_soap is not working after installation of fence-agents

2018-05-22 Thread Casey & Gina
Thanks, this worked! Also found this missing dependency issue documented here: https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pcs/issues/168 ** Bug watch added: github.com/ClusterLabs/pcs/issues #168 https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pcs/issues/168 -- You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 1772114] [NEW] Missing metadata for fence_vmware_soap and fence_ovh

2018-05-18 Thread Casey & Gina
Public bug reported: Using Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS, I installed pcs 0.9.149-1ubuntu1.1. After that, I run the command `pcs stonith list`. This indicates that there are errors with two of the fence agents, one of which I'm trying to use: [...] Error: no metadata for /usr/sbin/fence_ovh [...] Error: n

[Bug 1772098] [NEW] Version of pcs does not support external stonith plugins

2018-05-18 Thread Casey & Gina
Public bug reported: Using Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS, I installed pcs 0.9.149-1ubuntu1.1 along with cluster-glue 1.0.12~rc1+hg2777-1.2. The cluster-glue package installs a bunch of stonith plugins to /usr/lib/stonith/plugins/external. Unfortunately, it seems that these are not usable with this version

[Bug 1772096] [NEW] fence_vmware_soap is not working after installation of fence-agents

2018-05-18 Thread Casey & Gina
Public bug reported: Using Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS, I installed fence-agents 4.0.22-2 and pcs 0.9.149-1ubuntu1.1. After that, I run the command `pcs stonith list`. This indicates that there are errors with two of the fence agents, one of which I'm trying to use: [...] Error: no metadata for /usr/sbi