Public bug reported:
Mame now depends on rapidjson >= 1.0 in Debian unstable.
Please sync the package in bionic to help syncing Mame as well.
Thanks!
** Affects: rapidjson (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: rapidjson (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None =>
> ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),ppc64)
> PTR64=1
> i didnt set it because ubuntu on ppc is 32bit, kernels only are 64bit.
> and this make issue on libsdl too.
Please note architecture size is a different matter from pointer size.
You're right for the former, whilst pointer size on ppc64 is 8 byte:
This matter has been long debated within Mame packagers, and has finally
been agreed that:
- configuration and runtime files and subdirectories must lie in the
hidden directory ~/.mame. The reason is that the user doesn't need to
see them though he/she may like to (e.g. to share the snapshot
This is by design: hidden directory like .mame are for configuration and
run-time data purposes.
For resource files (roms, samples etc.) a subdirectory is more
appropriate.
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco)
** Changed in: mame (Ubu
+1
Could be video driver related tough.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994508
Title:
-window option doesn't work
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Unfortunately, I've never been able to reproduce the bug. Also please
note the mame-common package was superseded by mame/mess/mess-data
series long ago.
Could we please consider this closed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Verbatim from your DpkgTerminalLog.txt
Unpacking mame (0.152-0ubuntu2) ...
dpkg-deb (subprocess): decompressing archive member: lzma error: compressed
data is corrupt
dpkg-deb: error: subprocess decompress returned error exit status 2
dpkg: error processing archive
I randomly have the same issue, usually solved by a warm reboot, seldom
needed twice.
Ubuntu is the only OS on my box (AMD X2), undergone multiple upgrades
starting with 8.10.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I have the same problem with the package in the main repository for
quantal.
I've built it on my quantal box and it works.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068466
Title:
none of the
Colin: I see. The right version number is awkward matter either.
I can't use 0.146-5ubuntu1 because it would be greater than raring version to
dpkg.
I can't use 0.146-4.99ubuntu1 because it's not true.
Do you reckon 0.146-5~ubuntu12.10 could be a good choice?
--
You received this bug
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu Quantal)
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063993
Title:
mame crashes with illegal instruction
To manage notifications
There is no mame package in the quantal-proposed queue.
I apologize, I didn't realize it had been rejected.
I've uploaded it again, I see it in the unapproved packages list now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Description changed:
[Impact]
- A strict optimization causes the executable to crash on particular i386 and
amd64 CPUs.
+ A strict optimization causes the executable to crash on particular i386 and
amd64 CPUs.
[Test Case]
Unfortunately, there's no way to reproduce the bug unless
** Also affects: mame (Ubuntu Quantal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+ A strict optimization causes the executable to crash on particular i386 and
amd64 CPUs.
+
+ [Test Case]
+ Unfortunately, there's no way to reproduce the bug unless your box
Thanks Brian. I added the info and synced 0.146-5 from Debian unstable
to quantal-proposed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063993
Title:
mame crashes with illegal instruction
To
Uploaded fix to precise-proposed.
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Cesare Falco (c.falco)
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Patch added: Replace -march with -mtune=generic
My guess is bad processor optimization.
Could you please try the new build from my PPA?
https://launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive/ppa/+packages
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063993
Thanks for your time to report the issue.
Is this game-specific or Mame crashes with every game you try?
Did you build and install 0.147 from original source or did you made a
.deb file and installed it with dpkg?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Please find the debdiff:
https://launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive/ppa/+files/mame_0.144-0ubuntu1_0.145-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
as well as a build for precise:
https://launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive/ppa/+sourcepub/2241788/+listing-archive-extra
on my PPA and sponsor before FF. :)
Thanks!
Cesare.
--
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927941
Title:
[Update] New upstream release 0.145
To manage notifications about this bug
Public bug reported:
A new upstream release is available, 0.145
** Affects: mame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927941
Title:
Not yet, sorry. :(
Some implementation is still needed in the Debian package to grant
proper backward compatibility and I don't want to mess things up just
before an LTS release. ;)
Please go ahead with the sponsoring process.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Public bug reported:
A new upstream release is available: Mame 0.144.
** Affects: mame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Confirmed
** Tags: patch update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Patch added: mame_0.144-0ubuntu1.debdiff.bz2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913550/+attachment/2663272/+files/mame_0.144-0ubuntu1.debdiff.bz2
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Please note I'll be on a trip in the next few days, please leave any
comments or suggestions and I'll consider them ASAP.
Thank you! :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913550
Title:
Work is in progress, slow but steady due to a number of things
happening, including MESS source being now distributed standalone
instead of an incremental tarball for the MAME tree.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 326000 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326000
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 326000
xmess-x error: compiled byte ordering doesn't match machine byte ordering
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 326000 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326000
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 326000
xmess-x error: compiled byte ordering doesn't match machine byte ordering
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
xmame has been long discontinued now, and so the package.
Please install mame instead
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=mamesearchon=namessuite=allsection=all
Cesare.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Summary changed:
- Please sync mame 0.143-2 (multiverse) from Debian testing (non-free)
+ Please move mame 0.143-2 from universe to multiverse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820277
The same applies for mame-tools.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820277
Title:
Please move mame 0.143-2 from universe to multiverse
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Work is still in progress to start syncing Mame from Debian, but it
won't be finished for oneiric.
I posted a patch in another bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mame/+bug/803468
Should we consider this a duplicate?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Tags added: patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/803468
Title:
[Need Packaging] New upstream release 0.143
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
@benjamin: I'm currently working with the Debian guys in that direction, but
there's still some work to be done.
I hope to start syncing with 12.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
@evan: thanks for all your suggestion, which witness how deep you looked
inside the package. And teach me a number of new things as well. :)
1. No, mame-tools does not need mame, ldplayer was responsible for such
dependency and is now gone. I pointed this out in changelog too.
2. xmame has been
(Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/803468
Title:
[Need
Hello,
this is the debian.tar for Mame 0.143.
Ubuntu Sponsors, please have a look at it and consider uploading.
Thanks!
Cesare.
** Attachment added: mame_0.143-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.bz2
Public bug reported:
New upstream release Mame 0.143 is available
** Affects: mame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/803468
** Summary changed:
- [update] Mame 0.143 new upstream release
+ [upgrade] Mame 0.143 new upstream release
** Summary changed:
- [upgrade] Mame 0.143 new upstream release
+ [upgrade] New upstream release 0.143
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Fixed and updated debian/changelog.
Thanks,
Cesare.
** Attachment added: mame_0.141-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mame/+bug/671358/+attachment/1783985/+files/mame_0.141-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
)
Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671358
Title:
[upgrade] New upstream release 0.141
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
by Cesare Falco cesare.fa...@gmail.com
dpkg-source --before-build mame-0.140
fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh clean
dh_testdir
debian/rules override_dh_auto_clean
make[1]: ingresso nella directory «/home/cesare/tmp/mame140/mame-0.140»
/usr/bin/make OPT_FLAGS=-D'INI_PATH=\/etc/mame\' FULLNAME=mame
(Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) = (unassigned)
--
[upgrade] New upstream release 0.140
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671358
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) = (unassigned)
--
[upgrade] New upstream release 0.140
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671358
You received this bug notification because you
Those marked with u are unstable releases, sometimes buggy, seldom breaking
minor functionalities.
I resolved and recommend not to officially package them, and to stick
with major releases.
** Changed in: mame (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
[upgrade] New upstream release
This is the debian.tar.gz for the new release.
A build for natty is available on PPA:
https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive/mame
Please revise and upload it, thanks!
** Attachment added: mame_0.140-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: mame
A new upstream release is available at http://mamedev.org
** Affects: mame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[upgrade] New upstream release 0.140
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671358
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: btpd
New upstream version 0.16 for btpd was already waiting for upload in maverick,
unfortunately it simply missed FF for no reason other than Sponsor Team
overload.
Please see https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613652
Please consider granting a FFe, due
** Attachment added: changelog_excerpt.txt
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/619691/+attachment/1497345/+files/changelog_excerpt.txt
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: btpd
New upstream version 0.16 for btpd was already waiting for upload in
maverick, unfortunately it
FFe filed, please see
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/btpd/+bug/619691
Let's see whether it gets granted.
Thank for your help,
Cesare.
--
[needs-packaging] [upgrade] btpd new upstream 0.16
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613652
You received this bug notification because you are
Thank you Stefan, I'm now telling the Sponsor Team.
Cheers,
Cesare.
2010/8/18, StefanPotyra stefan.pot...@informatik.uni-erlangen.de:
ACK, please go ahead.
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
[FFe request] New upstream: btpd 0.16
Request has been acknowledged, please consider uploading.
Cheers,
Cesare.
--
[needs-packaging] [upgrade] btpd new upstream 0.16
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613652
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Done, I've also changed any reference to the Regents and University in favour
of a more generic authors.
Here's the new .debian.tar.gz file.
All the best,
Cesare.
** Attachment added: btpd_0.16-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz
btpd changed maintainer and home site in the last few weeks.
It's now hosted on github:
http://wiki.github.com/btpd/btpd/
Cheers,
Cesare.
2010/8/8, Iain Lane i...@orangesquash.org.uk:
I can't find this release on the upstream website. Where did you get it
from?
--
[needs-packaging]
Here's the new debian.tar.gz; packaging has undergone an heavy rework:
* upgrade source format to 3.0
* switch from dpatch to quilt
* debian/copyright compliance with DEP-5
* use of dh script in debian/rules
* many other improvements and a general better compliance with recent
packaging
Yes, installing libsdl-1.2debian-pulseaudio should solve the issue.
If not, try removing any libsdl-1.2debian-* package and install libsdl-1
.2debian-all instead.
Cesare.
--
[Karmic] sdlmame hangs on exit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572905
You received this bug notification because you
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: btpd
A new release is available.
** Affects: btpd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[upgrade] btpd new upstream 0.16
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613652
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
It should have been listed in 0.138, I screwed things up with the high number
of updates/versions/revisions I'm currently maintaining.
Please either fix it or leave it alone, I think it's a rather trivial
issue; both variables are not used.
Thank you!
Cesare.
--
[upgrade] mame new upstream
Here's the new debian.tar.gz.
A build for maverick is also avalaible on MAME PPA:
https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive/mame/+packages
Please check this before FF, thanks! :)
Cesare.
** Attachment added: mame_0.139-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: mame
A new upstream version is available.
** Affects: mame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[upgrade] mame new upstream 0.139
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612070
You received this bug notification because you are a
Here's the new debian.tar.gz.
I assume 0.138-0ubuntu1 is already in maverick (even if it's not listed on
http://packages.ubuntu.com),
so I've bumped revision to 0ubuntu2. If this is does not apply, please edit
changelog before uploading.
Changes included:
1. Fixed dependencies in
Forgot to mention, a build is avalaible on MAME ppa:
https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive/mame/+packages
Cesare.
--
package mame (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite
'/usr/games/mame', which is also in package sdlmame 0.136-0ubuntu2
Yes, I've been suggested to change the Replaces: dependency with Breaks: and I
guess this is wrong. ;)
Also, I'm getting back with archs restriction, as i386 and amd64 are the
only platforms currently supported upstream. I removed overrides
specific to other archs as well.
I'll try a build on
Licence is definitely incompatible with Ubuntu.
I propose to close this bug.
Cesare Falco.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Triaged = Opinion
--
[needs-packaging] shorten
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158451
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Ok, all points are now fixed.
Here's the new .debian.tar.gz, and a build for maverick is available on PPA:
https://edge.launchpad.net/~c.falco/+archive/mame/+packages
Thanks for all your help,
Cesare.
** Attachment added: mame_0.138-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz
Ok, thanks.
One thing is puzzling me: I added quilt to build dependencies because of
dh clean --with quilt failing, unable to find quilt addon.
Has this been solved in debhelper 7.0.50?
Cesare.
--
[upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538369
You received this bug
I've nearly addressed points 9-12, I'm currently stuck with point 13.
Mame should build on any archs, however it has been successfully tested on
Intel only;
LPIA would build fine, but the resulting binary would also be unusable due to
higher cpu request.
Thus the restriction.
I can both
1. fixed
2. header added; already fixed by upstream maintainer in unstable release
0.138u1
3. fixed
4. patch sent upstream
5. done
6. debian/control changed/updated; also patch with typos fixes sent upstream
7. done
8. done
9. done
10. done
11. This will take time, however it's in my to-do list
** Summary changed:
- [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.137
+ [upgrade] mame new upstream 0.138
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: sdlmame
- A new upstream release of MAME is available, 0.137.
+ A new upstream release of MAME is available, 0.138.
This replaces SDLMAME, after
This is the .debian.tar.gz for the new release 0.138.
To build the package you can either:
- use the get-orig-source target after untarring the debian/ directory
- download the .orig.tar.gz from MAME PPA, where you can also find binaries
built for maverick:
Fix committed, see bug #538369.
Cesare.
** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
[needs renaming] sdlmame to mame
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538367
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
-- Cesare Falco cesare.fa...@gmail.com Sat, 03 Apr 2010 09:51:27 +0200
Just in case, I also would suggest to refresh source orig tarball, as it
currently expands to sdlmame0136 instead of sdlmame-0.136. You can both
download the original .zip and repack it manually or use the get-orig-
source target
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: sdlmame
Nothing more to say, recently SDLMame has been renamed to MAME upstream.
** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Summary changed:
- [needs renaming] sdlmame became mame
+ [needs renaming] sdlmame to mame
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: sdlmame
A new upstream release of MAME is available, 0.137.
This replaces SDLMAME, after projects merging.
See also bug #538367
** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Description changed:
Binary package
Hello Fabrice,
here's the new diff.gz, including fixes to changelog entry and
debian/control file, as well as whatsnew.txt now in debian (rules
updated accordingly).
Package builds on both karmic (pbuilder on my box) and lucid (see my
PPA, I had to bump to 0ubuntu2 to avoid conflict with
Hello Fabrice,
retrieving whatsnew.txt from the net is just a quick fix for the current
release. Upstream maintainers didn't bother to repack the zipfile, but
it will be back with 0.137. Putting whatsnew.txt in debian would require
some changes in debian/rules. If you feel it would be cleaner,
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - sdlmame 0.136.
To build the source package use
zcat sdlmame_0.136-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0
cd sdlmame-0.136
chmod +x debian/rules
debian/rules get-orig-source
mv sdlmame_0.136.orig.tar.gz ../
cd ..
tar xvfz sdlmame_0.136.orig.tar.gz
and
Hello Fabrice,
the NOASM make variable selects which emulation engine to use. For all
the targets currently supported by Ubuntu is recommended unsetting it,
to take full advantage of the Assembly core when available. On the other
hand, there are other targets (e.g. ARM or MIPS, according to the
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: sdlmame
New SDLMAME upstream 0.136 needs packaging.
** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream release 0.136
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502191
You received this bug notification
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - sdlmame 0.135.
A fixed watch file as suggested by Fabrice is included.
To build the source package use:
zcat sdlmame_0.135-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0
cd sdlmame-0.135
chmod +x debian/rules
debian/rules get-orig-source
mv
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 403212 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403212
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 403212
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream release 0.134
--
sdlmame new upstream: 0.134
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444792
You received this bug notification
Hello Fabrice,
and thanks for your help.
1. I agree, the watch file should not track unstable releases. I'll
put it very high in my to-do list. :)
2. No, 0.133 and 0.134 are so called stable (major) releases. Mame
developers agreed to a tight development cycle, with each release
planned in
Please DON'T upload Artur Rona's package.
SDLMAME 0.134u1 is a beta release, it can be even broken at some extent,
and speaking as the official maintainer, I strongly believe only major
releases are safe enough to reach the repository.
I'll upload 0.134 as soon as possible. With feature freeze
in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) = (unassigned)
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
[upgrade] Please
I know work is in progress to let sdlmame enter the official debian
repository, and when it's done we can see whether diversion is needed.
In the meantime, I see no reason to sync the official package with an
unofficial repository for debian.
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream release 0.133
Could anyone please close this bug?
SDLMAME is now in the multiverse repository. ;-)
Thanks!
Cesare.
--
[needs-packaging] SDLMAME
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135879
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - sdlmame 0.133.
To build the source package use
zcat sdlmame_0.133-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0
cd sdlmame-0.133
chmod +x debian/rules
debian/rules get-orig-source
mv sdlmame_0.133.orig.tar.gz ../
cd ..
tar xvfz sdlmame_0.133.orig.tar.gz
and
Public bug reported:
A new upstream release is available.
** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Summary changed:
- New upstream release 0.133
+ [upgrade] New upstream release 0.133
** Summary changed:
- [upgrade] New upstream release 0.133
+
Please don't change either description or tags, they are used by sponsors to
process sponsoring queue.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Sponsorship/SponsorsQueue
** Summary changed:
- [karmic] Please update btpd to 0.15 version
+ [upgrade] Please update btpd to 0.15 version
** Tags added: patch
** Summary changed:
- Update BTPD version to 0.15
+ [upgrade] Update BTPD version to 0.15
--
[upgrade] Update BTPD version to 0.15
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335440
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = New
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) = (unassigned)
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Update BTPD version to 0.15
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335440
You
Released tagged with a u are unstable ones, very similar to beta.
I'm not going to package them as they seldom even break working code.
--
[upgrade] New upstream release 0.132
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390157
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Public bug reported:
A new upstream release is available.
** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[upgrade] New upstream release 0.132
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390157
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - sdlmame 0.132.
To build the source package use
zcat sdlmame_0.132-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0
cd sdlmame-0.132
chmod +x debian/rules
debian/rules get-orig-source
mv sdlmame_0.132.orig.tar.gz ../
cd ..
tar xvfz sdlmame_0.132.orig.tar.gz
and
) = Cesare Falco (c.falco)
--
Update BTPD version to 0.15
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335440
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo
Here's some explanation:
- ARCHOPTS=-march=pentium-mmx \
+ ARCHOPTS=-march=pentium2 \
sdlmame requires fast machines or it runs so slow it's unusable; optimization
for i686 offers some performance improvement (comment put in changelog)
-Standards-Version: 3.7.3
+Standards-Version: 3.8.0
Could anyone please sponsor sdlmame 0.129?
Feature Freeze is approaching and I'm concerned it could miss it... :)
Thanks!
Cesare.
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Confirmed
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
A new upstream has been released.
** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
