[Bug 402646] Re: prevu ships with absolutely no documentation

2009-07-23 Thread Chet Gray
** Also affects: prevu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- prevu ships with absolutely no documentation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402646 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 377135] Re: [needs-packaging] processing

2009-06-26 Thread Chet Gray
** Bug watch added: Processing bugs database #596 http://dev.processing.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=596 ** Also affects: processing via http://dev.processing.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=596 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #433270

[Bug 377135] Re: [needs-packaging] processing

2009-06-26 Thread Chet Gray
Adam, upstream does provide a compile script, but it's not at all geared towards a package management system like dpkg. The tarball includes things like ecj and a some Java libraries that should be pulled in as dependencies. I've taken a look at it, and believe me, it's not as easy as to package

[Bug 105492] Re: [needs-packaging] processing

2009-05-25 Thread Chet Gray
Haha, I haven't messed with packaging Processing in a while, not since they began moving the build process to Ant. I'll take another look at the trunk and see what's happened since then. -- [needs-packaging] processing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105492 You received this bug notification

[Bug 369630] [NEW] awesome depends on libxcb-keysyms0, but xcb-util now has libxcb-keysyms1

2009-04-29 Thread Chet Gray
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: awesome awesome 3.2.1-1 (synced from sid) depends on libxcb-keysyms0 (and build- depends on libxcb-keysyms0-dev), but the xcb-util synced from sid, 0.3.4-1, has bumped the keysyms version and replaced libxcb-keysyms0 with libxcb-keysyms1. This prevents

[Bug 105492] Re: [needs-packaging] processing

2008-07-22 Thread Chet Gray
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #433270 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=433270 ** Also affects: debian via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=433270 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- [needs-packaging] processing

[Bug 68984] Re: no file /usr/share/apps/kdm/sessions/ratpoison.desktop

2008-06-03 Thread Chet Gray
Thanks for the knowledge. I s'pose we should mark this bug as invalid in Ubuntu, then. -- no file /usr/share/apps/kdm/sessions/ratpoison.desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68984 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is subscribed to kdebase in

[Bug 68984] Re: no file /usr/share/apps/kdm/sessions/ratpoison.desktop

2008-06-03 Thread Chet Gray
/usr/share/apps/kdm/sessions/*.desktop are from upstream. The Ubuntu package does not use those, but uses /usr/share/xsessions/*.desktop ** Changed in: kdebase (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- no file /usr/share/apps/kdm/sessions/ratpoison.desktop

[Bug 68984] Re: no file /usr/share/apps/kdm/sessions/ratpoison.desktop

2008-06-02 Thread Chet Gray
Cool, so fixing bug 69155 would make this bug moot. Why does the KDM package install files to /usr/share/apps/kdm/sessions? -- no file /usr/share/apps/kdm/sessions/ratpoison.desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68984 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu

[Bug 68984] Re: no file /usr/share/apps/kdm/sessions/ratpoison.desktop

2008-05-31 Thread Chet Gray
ratpoison isn't responsible for placing a desktop in /usr/share/apps/kdm/sessions, only in /usr/share/xsessions ** Changed in: kdebase (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: ratpoison = kdebase -- no file /usr/share/apps/kdm/sessions/ratpoison.desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68984 You received

[Bug 68984] Re: no file /usr/share/apps/kdm/sessions/ratpoison.desktop

2008-05-31 Thread Chet Gray
No, this is a bug in kdm. Window managers should put .desktop files for their sessions in /usr/share/xsessions. kdm is responsible for /usr/share/apps/kdm/sessions (or /usr/lib/kde4/share/kde4/apps/kdm/sessions/ for kdm-kde4). Of course, ratpoison doesn't install

[Bug 69155] Re: Package fails to install .desktop in /usr/share/xsessions

2008-05-31 Thread Chet Gray
As Dan O'Huiginn noted, the Debian fix does not apply to Ubuntu, as Ubuntu's x-window-manager packages use /usr/share/xsessions. ** Changed in: ratpoison (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- Package fails to install .desktop in /usr/share/xsessions

[Bug 68984] Re: no file /usr/share/apps/kdm/sessions/ratpoison.desktop

2008-05-31 Thread Chet Gray
The bug for /usr/share/xsessions/ratpoison.desktop is bug 69155 -- no file /usr/share/apps/kdm/sessions/ratpoison.desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68984 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 236381] [NEW] Doesn't install /usr/share/xsessions/stumpwm.desktop

2008-05-31 Thread Chet Gray
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: stumpwm stumpwm should install a .desktop file in /usr/share/xsessions so it is included in gdm's list of X sessions. ** Affects: stumpwm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Doesn't install /usr/share/xsessions/stumpwm.desktop

[Bug 224624] Re: Package should depend on sbcl

2008-05-31 Thread Chet Gray
StumpWM doesn't technically need sbcl. It needs an implementation of Common Lisp, and CLX (the Common Lisp X interface, basically Xlib for Common Lisp). The stumpwm package Depends on common-lisp-controller, which helps with making sure there's a CL compiler, and cl-clx-sbcl | cmucl-source |

[Bug 224624] Re: Package should depend on sbcl

2008-05-31 Thread Chet Gray
/usr/bin/stumpwm contains: load_lisp() { case $1 in cmucl) lisp -eval $EVAL_LOAD $EVAL_RUN ;; sbcl) sbcl --eval $EVAL_LOAD --eval $EVAL_RUN ;; clisp) clisp -x $EVAL_LOAD $EVAL_RUN

[Bug 224624] Re: Package should depend on sbcl

2008-05-31 Thread Chet Gray
stumpwm should Depend on sbcl | cmucl | clisp ** Changed in: stumpwm (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Package should depend on sbcl https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224624 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 44404] Re: Smarty in php.ini Include

2008-05-12 Thread Chet Gray
I'm reopening as confirmed. We could have smarty put a config file in the php conf.d as I described in my previous comment; ** Changed in: smarty (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- Smarty in php.ini Include https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44404 You received this bug notification

[Bug 44404] Re: Smarty in php.ini Include

2008-05-12 Thread Chet Gray
I've just realized that my fix only works if include_path has already been set in php.ini. It seems that if include_path has not been explicitly set before conf.d/smarty.ini is included it causes a segfault. -- Smarty in php.ini Include https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44404 You received this bug

[Bug 105492] Re: [needs-packaging] processing

2008-02-03 Thread Chet Gray
** Bug watch added: 'Bug tracker at http://dev.processing.org/bugs/' #596 http://dev.processing.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=596 ** Also affects: processing via http://dev.processing.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=596 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- [needs-packaging] processing

[Bug 105492] Re: [needs-packaging] processing

2008-02-03 Thread Chet Gray
** Description changed: - Homepage : http://www.proce55ing.net/ + Homepage : http://processing.org/ Processing is an open source programming language and environment for people who want to program images, animation, and interactions. It is used by students, artists, designers,

[Bug 105492] Re: [needs-packaging] processing

2008-02-03 Thread Chet Gray
** Changed in: processing Importance: Unknown = Undecided Bugwatch: Processing bugs database #596 = None Status: Unknown = New ** Changed in: processing Importance: Undecided = Unknown Bugwatch: None = Processing bugs database #596 Status: New = Unknown --