[Bug 883459]

2022-04-27 Thread Christian Hilberg
Created attachment 148406 signature.asc Am Mittwoch, 27. April 2022, 10:57:26 CEST schrieb ederag: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283682 > > --- Comment #229 from ederag --- > (In reply to r.kunschke from comment #228) > > Is there any workaround or something? > > Adding this filter

[Bug 883459]

2016-09-12 Thread Christian Hilberg
Update to behaviour of Kmail 5.2.3 (KDEPIM 16.04.3) on Debian/Testing: Currently, I do not get any more dupes while pipe-through-filtering. Changes in setup (now: working, before: dupes): * IMAP now Dovecot (instead of ye olde Binc IMAP used before) * Filtering now spamc+daemon (instead of

[Bug 883459]

2016-09-12 Thread Christian Hilberg
(In reply to Eric Depagne from comment #163) > (In reply to Christian Hilberg from comment #160) > Hi Christian, > I am a bit embarrassed, because I answered the wrong bug report. Thus, my > message has really nothing to do with this one! Seems there has been some confusion abou

[Bug 883459]

2016-07-25 Thread Christian Hilberg
@Eric: While it might be true that activities do the trick for mail filtering, I guess we're talking about a bug in the existing Kmail2 mail filter functionality. Testing with Kmail 5.2.3 (KDEPIM 16.04.3) on Debian/Sid shows a slightly different behaviour. Simple "move to" filters do not

[Bug 883459]

2016-07-25 Thread Christian Hilberg
Okay, there is still some duplication in KMail 5.2.3 with the pipe- through ... if the filtered message is *not* spam, then it gets dupe'd inside the folder it resides, typically INBOX. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdepim

[Bug 883459]

2016-07-18 Thread Christian Hilberg
@Dennis: Hum, that setting does not change anything for me regarding dupes. Even when activated, the dupes appear. Confirming that the bug persists for me (newly created IMAP kmail account, newly created filters) as of kmail 5.2.2, KDE SC 16.04.02, KF 5.23.0, on Debian/Sid. -- You received this

[Bug 883459]

2016-07-11 Thread Christian Hilberg
Any updates on this regarding KF5-based KDEPIM 16.04? Has the issue been resolved? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/883459 Title: KMail duplicates emails To manage notifications about

[Bug 883459]

2015-09-20 Thread Christian Hilberg
Confirming this still happens with KF5 Kontact/Kmail 4.14.10 on today's debian/stretch (where it seems almost all KF5 packages have materialized). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/883459

[Bug 883459]

2015-03-14 Thread Christian Hilberg
Duplicate of this bug: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95064 Possibly related: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=288040 Possibly related: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333035 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 883459]

2015-03-14 Thread Christian Hilberg
Seeing the same issue on Debian for 4.14.1 (jessie) as well as 4.14.2 (sid). For me, duplicates occur only if mail filtering does NOT move the mail to a folder different from INBOX (using IMAP), where I let the filtering happen. Moreover, Folder-Remove Duplicate Messages does not work. Of

[Bug 1016165] Re: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.16-dfsg-2: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build [error: implicit declaration of function ‘do_mmap’]

2012-07-24 Thread Christian Hilberg
Sorry, still no go - build inside VBox 4.1.18-78361~Ubuntu~lucid from virtualbox.org with kernel 3.5.0-6 fails for the very same reason as it did before. This was to be expected since it is a different VBox build, but the same VBox release as I had before from debfx. I gave it a try nonetheless,

[Bug 1016165] Re: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.16-dfsg-2: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build [error: implicit declaration of function ‘do_mmap’]

2012-07-24 Thread Christian Hilberg
The fix for this needs to be done in the VBox guest modules code. Kernels 3.5 and up do no longer export do_mmap() as public symbol, and I doubt they ever will. do_mmap() has been used in the gest modules code in a problematic way (as pointed out in http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/4/62), and the fix

[Bug 1016165] Re: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.16-dfsg-2: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build [error: implicit declaration of function ‘do_mmap’]

2012-07-17 Thread Christian Hilberg
See also: http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/4/62 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016165 Title: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.16-dfsg-2: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build [error:

[Bug 1008966] Re: Error building module: implicit declaration of function ‘do_mmap’

2012-07-17 Thread Christian Hilberg
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1016165 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016165 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1016165 virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.16-dfsg-2: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build [error: implicit declaration of function ‘do_mmap’] -- You

[Bug 1016165] Re: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.16-dfsg-2: virtualbox-guest kernel module failed to build [error: implicit declaration of function ‘do_mmap’]

2012-07-12 Thread Christian Hilberg
Still persisting for me with kernel 3.5.0-4 and VBox 4.1.18. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016165 Title: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.16-dfsg-2: virtualbox-guest kernel module

[Bug 878704] Re: Please backport libgdata 0.10.1-1 from precise to oneiric

2011-11-17 Thread Christian Hilberg
I've installed libgdata from the backports archive and checked with (a) prepackaged Evolution 3.2 as well as with (b) a freshly built Evolution 'git master', both worked well. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 878704] Re: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric

2011-11-09 Thread Christian Hilberg
With the backported libgdata13 (0.10.1-1) preinstalled, all of the packages mentioned above and their dependencies installed fine in an up- to-date Oneiric VirtualBox image. I do not have a native installation to test with. Results --- totem: Searching for YouTube videos works (this uses

[Bug 878704] Re: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric

2011-11-08 Thread Christian Hilberg
Thanks. Looks good so far for Oneiric. I've done the following: * from http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/libgdata13, get libgdata_0.10.1-1.dsc, libgdata_0.10.1.orig.tar.xz, libgdata_0.10.1-1.debian.tar.gz * using pbuilder on Oneiric and the vanilla files above (no changes needed), build the

[Bug 878704] Re: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric

2011-11-03 Thread Christian Hilberg
Ok thanks, will keep an eye on it. As soon as libgdata is bumped to = 0.10 in Precise, I'll act on it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878704 Title: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x

[Bug 878704] Re: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric

2011-10-21 Thread Christian Hilberg
FWIW, putting 0.10(.1) into oneiric-backports would be perfectly fine for me. Kind regards, Christian -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878704 Title: libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x

[Bug 879324] Re: apt-get dselect-upgrade prefers multiarch over native

2011-10-21 Thread Christian Hilberg
One more bit of information: mounting /proc and /sys from the host into the chroot (as one should do for using the chroot) actually does not make a difference for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 879324] [NEW] apt-get dselect-upgrade prefers multiarch over native

2011-10-21 Thread Christian Hilberg
Public bug reported: 'apt-get dselect-upgrade' prefers multiarch over native (i386 over amd64 in my case) for *some* packages for precise. How to reproduce: I've set up an amd64 precise chroot on an amd64 host from a mirror lagging behind with it's sync some time, then added some repos to the

[Bug 879324] Re: apt-get dselect-upgrade prefers multiarch over native

2011-10-21 Thread Christian Hilberg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/877681 might be related -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/879324 Title: apt-get dselect-upgrade prefers multiarch over native To

[Bug 879324] Re: apt-get dselect-upgrade prefers multiarch over native

2011-10-21 Thread Christian Hilberg
Yep, depends on the archive you're using. I've used the above one since it was lagging behind for long enough to show the effect. Moreover, I've just picked the 'joe' package as an example (since it one affected by the skew). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 878704] [NEW] libgdata version 0.9.1 vs. 0.10.x in Ubuntu Oneiric

2011-10-20 Thread Christian Hilberg
Public bug reported: Hi, --- System info: Description:Ubuntu 11.10 Release:11.10 libgdata13: Installed: 0.9.1-0ubuntu2 Candidate: 0.9.1-0ubuntu2 --- According to http://live.gnome.org/libgdata 0.9.1 this is an unstable version, which will not receive any upstream bug fixes.

[Bug 637416] Re: [needs-packaging] No NSS-Version of LibCurl available

2010-12-13 Thread Christian Hilberg
@Andreas: Yay, that's good news. Saw the bug report ping pong at the Debian tracker, looks good. Thanks for helping out! Cheers, Christian -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637416 Title:

[Bug 637416] Re: [needs-packaging] No NSS-Version of LibCurl available

2010-12-08 Thread Christian Hilberg
@Andreas: Thanks, this would have been next on my todo. (Only I was not yet sure where to put the wish, Ubuntu or Debian). Kind regards, Christian -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637416

[Bug 637416] Re: [needs-packaging] No NSS-Version of LibCurl available

2010-12-07 Thread Christian Hilberg
The rudimentary patchset is available from https://sourceforge.net/projects/evolution-kolab/files/patches/ and applies against the lucid source package. It should be applicable against later versions of the package without major issues since only the build rules and some accompanying files were

[Bug 637416] Re: [needs-packaging] No NSS-Version of LibCurl available

2010-11-19 Thread Christian Hilberg
Hi again, is there any activity of creating a libcurl-nss package for Ubuntu? I have hacked the lucid package into building a libcurl-nss in addition to the GnuTLS and OpenSSL variants (patches to the build scripts available on request), so it can be done without too much effort. Though my

[Bug 637416] [NEW] No NSS-Version of LibCurl available

2010-09-13 Thread Christian Hilberg
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: curl Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release:10.04 Version: 7.19.7-1ubuntu1 Although libcurl3 can be built against libnss3 (e.g. libnss3-1d, which is part of lucid), there is no such package in Ubuntu (neither lucid nor above).