Re: [Bug 1956212] Re: No Diodon applet in the Notification Zone

2022-01-12 Thread Christophe Lohr
Hello, > So one thing is that you verify that you have https://github.com/mate- > desktop/mate-indicator-applet installed (there should be a deb package) > and the applet is actually added to the panel. In fact, the mate-indicator-applet package is not installed on either of my two machines.

Re: [Bug 1956212] Re: No Diodon applet in the Notification Zone

2022-01-11 Thread Christophe Lohr
Le 11/01/2022 à 07:13, Oliver Sauder a écrit : > I have a feeling the issue is most likely not Diodon related but > indicator related. > > So to confirm this do you have another app which uses the libayatana- > indicator and see whether that shows up? I may need some guidance. Which app may I

Re: [Bug 1956212] Re: No Diodon applet in the Notification Zone

2022-01-10 Thread Christophe Lohr
Le 07/01/2022 à 18:54, Oliver Sauder a écrit : > I have found this https://github.com/ubuntu-mate/ubuntu-mate- > settings/blob/master/usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/30_ubuntu- > mate.gschema.override#L46 > > Maybe comparing those settings between the two MATE desktop you have > might reveal where the

Re: [Bug 1956212] Re: No Diodon applet in the Notification Zone

2022-01-07 Thread Christophe Lohr
Hello,   Is there any way to check if the problem could be with the Notification Zone rather than Diodon? Regards Christophe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956212 Title: No

Re: [Bug 1956212] Re: No Diodon applet in the Notification Zone

2022-01-05 Thread Christophe Lohr
Le 05/01/2022 à 12:42, Oliver Sauder a écrit : > I tried to reproduce this on Debian Stable with Mate and the indicator > appeared without any problem. To be honest, I have to admit that I have another PC with the same versions of debian mate diodon, and on which the applet works well... There

[Bug 62511] Re: dumps core on SIGQUIT

2012-10-05 Thread Christophe Lohr
Hi, Todays Apport (2.0.1) filters core dump on SIGQUIT. I'm not sure it is a good choice. The excuse put forward is that SIGQUIT is usually deliberately generated by users. And then? Sure, SIGQUIT is deliberately generated by users. Users may deliberately do want a core-dump of a process.