This looks similar to PR48808/48792, which was fixed by rsandiford in
upstream...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/807573
Title:
[armel / 4.6 regression] could not find a spill
I tried a native bootstrap of upstream trunk with the patch applied, and
succeeded.
This is getting more elusive...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689887
Title:
armel ICE gcc 4.5
This should be another case of LP #689887.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742961
Title:
libisofs ftbfs on armel with current gcc-4.5
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Pinged upstream yesterday: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
patches/2011-03/msg00308.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689887
Title:
armel ICE gcc 4.5
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I'll ping again when Richard E. returns.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689887
Title:
armel ICE gcc 4.5
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Patch posted here, awaiting review:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00794.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689887
Title:
armel ICE gcc 4.5
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
** Changed in: gcc-linaro
Status: Triaged = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689887
Title:
armel ICE gcc 4.5
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
The ICE looks familiar, can you provide a preprocessed .i file as a
testcase? Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689887
Title:
armel ICE gcc 4.5
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Another inline assembly error: in lxt.c:get_16(), change the =q constraint to
=Q for the xchgb instruction.
I think FSF 4.5 was probably merely lucky that the register allocator happened
to avoid this.
** Changed in: gcc-linaro
Status: Triaged = Invalid
--
You received this bug
I find this error on current mainline trunk too... maybe something we
backported?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685534
Title:
[regression] ftbfs with gcc-linaro 4.5 on amd64
--
** Changed in: gcc-linaro
Assignee: (unassigned) = Chung-Lin Tang (cltang)
--
dpkg segfaults during debootstrap on natty armel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674146
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
This seems to be a case of PR44768,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44768
Basically, early IPA SRA did not properly set up context, causing the
parse_error_msg.clone.1 function getting marked as 'volatile' (no return), thus
assuming callee-save registers can be clobbered...
This is not currently reproducible on latest Linaro 4.5 trunk.
--
ICE when building ziproxy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618684
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
A reduced C testcase that hits the same ICE on mainline trunk under -O1
** Attachment added: testcase.c
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fbasics/+bug/642043/+attachment/1657752/+files/testcase.c
--
[armel] gfortran ICE with armv7, armv5t and armv6 do work
14 matches
Mail list logo