[Bug 1976307] Re: Stack smashing in gamatronic driver

2022-05-31 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Thanks Lucas. I'm installing the version you prepared and will run it for a few days to see if it's stable, and then report back. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976307 Title: Stack

[Bug 1976307] [NEW] Stack smashing in gamatronic driver

2022-05-30 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Public bug reported: The gamatronic UPS driver in nut 2.7.4-14ubuntu2 randomly crashes after a memory violation attempt. This usually happens after many hours of operation, typically after 20h or more, and started after the update to jammy. No similar problems happened on focal. 116159.602986

[Bug 1668891] Re: Can install non classic snap with --classic, but classic flag isn't set

2020-09-21 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
** Changed in: snapd Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668891 Title: Can install non classic snap with --classic, but classic flag isn't set To

[Bug 1668891] Re: Can install non classic snap with --classic, but classic flag isn't set

2020-09-21 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
@didrocks: installing a non-classic snap with --classic with current snapd issues the following warning. (Using --classic shouldn't override the package confinement, the flag is still ignored but not silently.) $ snap install word-salad --classic Warning: flag --classic ignored for strictly

[Bug 1776622] Re: snapd updates on focal never finish installing. Can't install any other updates.

2020-08-24 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Michael, could you confirm this was a cosmic-specific bug as there's a report of a similar problem with an upgrade from eoan to focal? ** Changed in: snapd Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: snapd Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Vogt (mvo) -- You received this bug

[Bug 1631514] Re: snap doesnt work. error: cannot communicate with server

2020-08-24 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
This is a collection of bug reports and it seems that at least some of them are already solved either by manually enabling services or using newer versions of snapd. Are any of these issues still happening? ** Changed in: snapd Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug

[Bug 1886113] Re: snap-store Does Not Run with XAUTHORITY error

2020-07-28 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886113 Title: snap-store Does Not Run with XAUTHORITY error To manage notifications

[Bug 1886113] Re: snap-store Does Not Run with XAUTHORITY error

2020-07-27 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Thanks for reporting and sorry for not getting back to you earlier. It seems that we have a mismatch between the contents of the XAUTHORITY environment variable (under /home/william) and the actual location of the file on the filesystem (under /Moort/home/william) after resolving symlinks and

[Bug 1881588] Re: pre-seeding lxd on Core appliances breaks console-conf user creation

2020-06-15 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
** Changed in: snapd Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881588 Title: pre-seeding lxd on Core appliances breaks console-conf user creation To manage

[Bug 1879290] Re: pc: no message on the screen for ~30s on fast HW

2020-06-15 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Result of systemd-analyze in both systems on the Thinkcentre machine: uc18: Startup finished in 30.880s (kernel) + 4.727s (userspace) = 35.608s graphical.target reached after 4.721s in userspace uc20: Startup finished in 38.338s (kernel) + 17.902s (userspace) = 56.240s graphical.target reached

[Bug 1876083] Re: chromium snap from focal fails DNS lookups, or delays them (ipv6)

2020-06-01 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
I tested the chromium snap (1165) on a focal machine with IPv6 and couldn't reproduce DNS lookup problems. I did, however, find a difference between this chromium and unconfined chrome when handling IPv6 large packets (unconfined chrome works as expects and chromium times out). Unconfined chrome

[Bug 1879630] Re: No sound output from HDMI audio

2020-06-01 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
** Changed in: snapd Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879630 Title: No sound output from HDMI audio To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1879630] Re: No sound output from HDMI audio

2020-06-01 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Thanks Vic. I see from logs that the HDA codec is an ALC 233, which happens to be the same Realtek HDA codec I have in my Lenovo Thinkcentre machine that's running UC20 20200529.3. Unfortunately my Thinkcentre doesn't have any HDMI ports, but I was able to send sound through one of the

[Bug 1878541] Re: Grub fails to load kernel from squashfs if mem < 1500mb

2020-06-01 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Chris Coulson's patch should also solve the problem that breaks install on the Thinkcentre m920s with TPM enabled. The last printed message when booting with grub debug enabled is the type of the loopback file, and nothing happens after that. It finishes installing if you rmmod tpm. -- You

[Bug 1831629] Re: snapd hammers SSD for long periods

2020-05-29 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
I experienced a similar problem, with constant disk writing at low rate (few hundred KB/s) and after inspecting the snapd process running on a container we found the following: root@focal:/# snap changes

[Bug 1878928] Re: Call trace occurred when running `netplan apply` after an yaml is removed

2020-05-26 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Systems tested: qemu, rpi4 (1GB) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878928 Title: Call trace occurred when running `netplan apply` after an yaml is removed To manage notifications

[Bug 1878928] Re: Call trace occurred when running `netplan apply` after an yaml is removed

2020-05-26 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Fix seems good, I couldn't reproduce this bug using core20 663/665 from edge. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878928 Title: Call trace occurred when running `netplan apply` after an

[Bug 1879290] Re: pc: no message on the screen for ~30s on fast HW

2020-05-25 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
UC18 on the same hardware starts to display kernel messages at the 14s mark. UC18 logs shows no delay between the "console [tty1] enabled" and "console [ttyS0] enabled" messages, but otherwise the behavior is similar (blank screen for some time and slow output rate). [0.00] console [tty1]

[Bug 1879290] Re: pc: no message on the screen for ~30s on fast HW

2020-05-21 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
I finally managed to install a beta image on a Thinkcentre m920 (by removing the tpm module in grub before booting). Console output appears at the 32s mark, see full dmesg below. Some interesting console-related excerpts: [0.049211] printk: console [tty1] enabled [ 14.088918] printk:

[Bug 1870861] Re: chromium-browser is unable to open downloads

2020-04-07 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Also please include any additional information, if any, on how to reproduce this problem. Just downloading/opening a file worked correctly for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870861

[Bug 1870861] Re: chromium-browser is unable to open downloads

2020-04-07 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Thanks for reporting. The invalid opcode error seems odd, are you running on an uncommon architecture/cpu? Could you provide more information about the hardware you're running on such as the /proc/cpuinfo output? ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received

[Bug 1862642] Re: cannot use snapcraft to build snapd on focal

2020-02-10 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Assigned to Ian as a reminder to unblock PR #7904 once the prerequisites are cleared. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862642 Title: cannot use snapcraft to build snapd on focal To

[Bug 1862642] Re: cannot use snapcraft to build snapd on focal

2020-02-10 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
** Changed in: snapd Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: snapd Assignee: (unassigned) => Ian Johnson (anonymouse67) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862642 Title:

[Bug 1860231] Re: 5.4.0-11 crash on cryptsetup open

2020-01-18 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
This model file is used to build both the spread test image and the manually built image. The two generated images, however, seem to behave differently regarding the conditions leading to the crash: while it always happen in the spread test, higher KDF iteration times values allow the encrypted

[Bug 1860231] Re: 5.4.0-11 crash on cryptsetup open

2020-01-18 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Snap versions used to build the image: pc-kernel_374.snap pc_83.snap snapd_6113.snap core20_322.snap -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1860231 Title: 5.4.0-11 crash on cryptsetup open

[Bug 1860231] Re: 5.4.0-11 crash on cryptsetup open

2020-01-18 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
** Attachment added: "Screenshot of the procedure to trigger the crash" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1860231/+attachment/5321426/+files/Screenshot%20from%202020-01-18%2016-16-19.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1860231] [NEW] 5.4.0-11 crash on cryptsetup open

2020-01-18 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Public bug reported: An attempt to run cryptsetup open on a newly created LUKS partition on Ubuntu Core 20 causes a kernel crash. This happens in 100% of the attempts on the snapd Core 20 installation test, but on an image created to reproduce this bug it happens only when certain parameters are

[Bug 1853730] Re: package snapd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-removal возвратил код ошибки 1

2019-12-02 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853730 Title: package snapd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс

[Bug 1830183] Re: Absence of updates is labelled a critical error in syslog

2019-11-04 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Interesting. This is what I see here with Ksystemlog. ** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2019-11-04 20-01-25.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapd/+bug/1830183/+attachment/5302839/+files/Screenshot%20from%202019-11-04%2020-01-25.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1830183] Re: Absence of updates is labelled a critical error in syslog

2019-11-04 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Oh, but I see you read from `/var/log/syslog` instead of the systemd journal. I don't have snapd entries in the syslog file. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1830183 Title: Absence of

[Bug 1830183] Re: Absence of updates is labelled a critical error in syslog

2019-11-04 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
** Changed in: snapd Status: Incomplete => Triaged ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1830183 Title: Absence of

[Bug 1830183] Re: Absence of updates is labelled a critical error in syslog

2019-11-04 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Could you confirm this still happens with snapd 2.42? I quickly tested it and this type of message was logged in the system journal as `info` (level 6). ** Changed in: snapd Status: Triaged => Incomplete ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Incomplete -- You received

[Bug 1732943] Re: snapd 2.28.5 ADT test failure with linux-aws 4.4.0.1041.43

2019-10-07 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
I've been informed that all tests should be working correctly with the current snapd version, so this bug will be closed. Please reopen if this problem is still happening. ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1806320] Re: snapd 2.35.5+18.10 ADT test failure with linux 4.18.0-12.13

2019-10-07 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
I've been informed that all tests should be working correctly with the current snapd version, so this bug will be closed. Please reopen if this problem is still happening. ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1768747] Re: snapd 2.32.3.2 ADT test failure with linux 4.4.0-123.147

2019-10-07 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
I've been informed that all tests should be working correctly with the current snapd version, so this bug will be closed. Please reopen if this problem is still happening. ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1733516] Re: ADT test failure with linux-oem kernel

2019-10-07 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
I've been informed that all tests should be working correctly with the current snapd version, so this bug will be closed. Please reopen if this problem is still happening. ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1755445] Re: snapd 2.29.4.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe 4.13.0-37.42~16.04.1

2019-10-07 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
I've been informed that all tests should be working correctly with the current snapd version, so this bug will be closed. Please reopen if this problem is still happening. ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1806457] Re: snapd 2.34.2+18.04 ADT test failure 4.18 kernels on Bionic

2019-10-07 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
I've been informed that all tests should be working correctly with the current snapd version, so this bug will be closed. Please reopen if this problem is still happening. ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1749385] Re: snapd 2.29.4.2+17.10 ADT test failure with linux 4.13.0-35.39

2019-10-07 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
I've been informed that all tests should be working correctly with the current snapd version, so this bug will be closed. Please reopen if this problem is still happening. ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1775284] Re: snapd 2.32.9+18.04 ADT test failure with linux 4.15.0-23.25

2019-10-07 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
I've been informed that all tests should be working correctly with the current snapd version, so this bug will be closed. Please reopen if this problem is still happening. ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1748441] Re: snapd 2.29.4.2+17.10 ADT test failure with linux 4.13.0-33.36

2019-10-07 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
I've been informed that all tests should be working correctly with the current snapd version, so this bug will be closed. Please reopen if this problem is still happening. ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1733516] Re: ADT test failure with linux-oem kernel

2019-10-06 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Thanks for reporting this bug, sorry it's taken this long to respond. Could you confirm if this issue is still happening with the current snapd version? ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1755445] Re: snapd 2.29.4.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe 4.13.0-37.42~16.04.1

2019-10-06 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Thanks for reporting this bug, sorry it's taken this long to respond. Could you confirm if this issue is still happening with the current snapd version? ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1746774] Re: snapd 2.29.4.2+18.04 ADT test failure with linux 4.15.0-6.7

2019-10-06 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Thanks for reporting this bug, sorry it's taken this long to respond. Could you confirm if this issue is still happening with the current snapd version? ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1806320] Re: snapd 2.35.5+18.10 ADT test failure with linux 4.18.0-12.13

2019-10-06 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Thanks for reporting this bug, sorry it's taken this long to respond. Could you confirm if this issue is still happening with the current snapd version? ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1749385] Re: snapd 2.29.4.2+17.10 ADT test failure with linux 4.13.0-35.39

2019-10-06 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Thanks for reporting this bug, sorry it's taken this long to respond. Could you confirm if this issue is still happening with the current snapd version? ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1775284] Re: snapd 2.32.9+18.04 ADT test failure with linux 4.15.0-23.25

2019-10-06 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Thanks for reporting this bug, sorry it's taken this long to respond. Could you confirm if this issue is still happening with the current snapd version? ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1748441] Re: snapd 2.29.4.2+17.10 ADT test failure with linux 4.13.0-33.36

2019-10-06 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Thanks for reporting this bug, sorry it's taken this long to respond. Could you confirm if this issue is still happening with the current snapd version? ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1789652] Re: snapd 2.35+18.10 ADT test failure with linux 4.18.0-7.8

2019-10-06 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Thanks for reporting this bug, sorry it's taken this long to respond. Could you confirm if this issue is still happening with the current snapd version? ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1787439] Re: snapd 2.35~pre3+18.10.5 ADT test failure with linux 4.18.0-5.6

2019-10-06 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Thanks for reporting this bug, sorry it's taken this long to respond. Could you confirm if this issue is still happening with the current snapd version? ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1773366] Re: snapd 2.32.6+18.10ubuntu2 ADT test failure with linux 4.17.0-1.2+signed1

2019-10-06 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Thanks for reporting this bug, sorry it's taken this long to respond. Could you confirm if this issue is still happening with the current snapd version? ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1768747] Re: snapd 2.32.3.2 ADT test failure with linux 4.4.0-123.147

2019-10-06 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Thanks for reporting this bug, sorry it's taken this long to respond. Could you confirm if this issue still happening with the current snapd version? ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1732943] Re: snapd 2.28.5 ADT test failure with linux-aws 4.4.0.1041.43

2019-10-06 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Thanks for reporting this bug, sorry it's taken this long to respond. Could you confirm if this issue still happening with the current snapd version? ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1806457] Re: snapd 2.34.2+18.04 ADT test failure 4.18 kernels on Bionic

2019-10-06 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Thanks for reporting this bug, sorry it's taken this long to respond. Could you confirm if this issue still happening with the current snapd version? ** Changed in: snapd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1722478] Re: Two-finger scrolling no longer works after resuming from suspend

2019-09-18 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Just adding a quick note that I experienced this problem on a Thinkpad T480 running 18.04, after updating to 4.15.0-62-generic. Going back to 4.15.0-55-generic fixes the issue. I didn't check -58 and -60 to see how they behave, but I should do that as soon as I have time for that. Note that it may

[Bug 1722478] Re: Two-finger scrolling no longer works after resuming from suspend

2019-09-18 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Just adding a quick note that I experienced this problem on a Thinkpad T480 running 18.04, after updating to 4.15.0-62-generic. Going back to 4.15.0-55-generic fixes the issue. I didn't check -58 and -60 to see how they behave, but I should do that as soon as I have time for that. Note that it may

[Bug 1835279] Re: 4.15.0-54.58-generic 4.15.18: oops/BUG on LUKS open

2019-09-03 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
I tested the eoan kernel 5.2.0-10-generic and the suspected problems in the block layer didn't happen anymore after removing the workarounds (artificial delays and module insertion) needed by the bionic kernel 4.15.0-54-generic used in core18. 5.3.0-050300rc4-generic also works without any

[Bug 1835279] Re: 4.15.0-54.58-generic 4.15.18: oops/BUG on LUKS open

2019-07-31 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Thanks Connor. My test configuration is a custom core system using the official core18 kernel snap on a KVM-based virtual machine. The kernel snap is installed from channel 18 (snap download --channel 18 pc-kernel) and my current revision is 240. That said, it's easy to test new kernels as long as

[Bug 1835279] Re: 4.15.0-54.58-generic 4.15.18: oops/BUG on LUKS open

2019-07-18 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Thanks. I tested the proposed kernel and it does not prevent the crash, which still occurs under the same circumstances when cryptsetup open runs. It's possible, however, that the patch decreases the likehood of a crash. In a very un-scientific test the latest patched kernel crashed in 3 out of 10

[Bug 1835279] Re: 4.15.0-54.58-generic 4.15.18: oops/BUG on LUKS open

2019-07-16 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
The udev workaround preloading is unrelated and can be removed, crashes will also happen without using it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835279 Title: 4.15.0-54.58-generic 4.15.18:

[Bug 1835279] Re: 4.15.0-54.58-generic 4.15.18: oops/BUG on LUKS open

2019-07-15 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
** Attachment added: "4.15.0-54-generic #58+lp1835279 kernel log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1835279/+attachment/5277230/+files/kernel-arighi.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1835279] Re: 4.15.0-54.58-generic 4.15.18: oops/BUG on LUKS open

2019-07-15 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
We're now opening the LUKS device using the master key directly and the crash is happening again in both the original 4.15.0-54-generic (buildd@lgw01-amd64-014) kernel or the patched 4.15.0-54-generic (arighi@kathleen) kernel. The backtrace is very similar but unlike the previous scenario it

[Bug 1835279] Re: 4.15.0-54.58-generic 4.15.18: oops/BUG on LUKS open

2019-07-11 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Thanks Andrea. The new kernel seems to address the problem in such a way that the block device made available is still not immediately usable, but the kernel crash is prevented (at least in the test runs so far). Now errors can be handled from userspace to retry the operation in case of failure.

[Bug 1835279] Re: 4.15.0-54.58-generic 4.15.18: oops/BUG on LUKS open

2019-07-03 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Further testing suggests that the problem is caused by the kernel not having enough time to settle after partx -u exits (race between acknowledging the new block device and actually having it available?). Adding a 1s pause after the partition table is re-read seems to prevent this crash. -- You

[Bug 1835279] Re: 4.15.0-54.58-generic 4.15.18: oops/BUG on LUKS open

2019-07-03 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
This problem happens on Ubuntu Core (Core 20 development branch based on Core 18) and apport is not available. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1835279] Re: 4.15.0-54.58-generic 4.15.18: oops/BUG on LUKS open

2019-07-03 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
** Description changed: This is Linux version 4.15.0-54-generic (buildd@lgw01-amd64-014) (gcc version 7.4.0 (Ubuntu 7.4.0-1ubuntu1~18.04.1)) #58-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jun 24 10:55:24 UTC 2019 (Ubuntu 4.15.0-54.58-generic 4.15.18), from pc- kernel_240.snap Version signature:

[Bug 1835279] [NEW] 4.15.0-54.58-generic 4.15.18: oops/BUG on LUKS open

2019-07-03 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
Public bug reported: This is Linux version 4.15.0-54-generic (buildd@lgw01-amd64-014) (gcc version 7.4.0 (Ubuntu 7.4.0-1ubuntu1~18.04.1)) #58-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jun 24 10:55:24 UTC 2019 (Ubuntu 4.15.0-54.58-generic 4.15.18), from pc- kernel_240.snap Version signature: 4.15.0-54.58-generic 4.15.18