@Brendan, do the fixes to the script resolve this problem?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136
Title:
CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and IBM X3500 M3 goes offline after
Gema, can you run the dd or vm creation using ionice -c 3 and see if
this helps or not, e.g.
ionice -c 3 dd if=/dev/zero of=test.img bs=1M count=2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #12309
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12309
** Also affects: linux via
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12309
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
@Gema, I've now been able to reproduce this. I've found that the
following helps reduce the problem on my desktop:
echo 10 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
Can you try this and let me know if this helps.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Yesterday I built a set of kernel images containing the following patch
which was tested by Stuart and seems to fix the issue.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-pmm=133573212512122w=2
The kernels are available: http://zinc.canonical.com/~cking/sil
Anyone else experiencing this bug can give these
@Ben, once it has landed upstream I will try to get into Precise under
the normal Stable Release Updates policy, which may take a few to
several weeks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I'd like to chime in here with a few observations.
1) When gathering data from powertop one needs to ensure the sample time is
long enough and also one takes a bunch of samples to ensure you are getting
valid data.
2) The power consumption measurements from some batteries is tricky to estimate
@Brendan the reason why it fails on machines with 10 or more CPUs is
because one is grep'ing for cpu1 which matches on CPU10, CPU11, CPU12,
CPU13, CPU14, CPU15 on the 16 CPU machine. So the script is broken.
It looks like /proc/interrupts CPU* headed columns end with trailing
spaces, so we could
Couple of questions to get an idea about your machine:
1 which tools are you using to create a VM, and how.
2. how fast is your HDD?
use the following and run 3 times, please supply the results to the bug.
sudo hdparm -t /dev/sda
sudo hdparm -T /dev/sda
3. Please run:
vmstat 1 vmstat.log
So, I suspect we have some conflicting requirements for the I/O
operations which aren't helping here. If you are running firefox I
suspect it may be issuing occasional fsync() calls which isn't helping.
My current hypothesis is that the virtual memory tuneables may need
tweaking to match your
(Ubuntu)
Importance: Low = Medium
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Colin King (colin-king)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988799
Title:
Precise freezes under
OK, so I hadn't realized the machine was a desktop, hence the vm
settings are fairly low anyhow, so we shall scrub that idea above.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988799
Title:
Can you try:
echo deadline | sudo tee /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler
and see if that helps with interactivity while doing the heavy write
I/O activity. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Just to add, I'm seeing the same issue (no launcher on an external
monitor in mirror mode) on two machines:
Dell Inspiron 1501 (AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-50, ATI RS482 [Radeon
Xpress 200M] and also
Dell Inspiron 6400 (Intel Core 2 T5200), ATI M52 [Mobility Radeon X1300]
--
You
So this bug isn't a kernel issue at all. the culprit is the following
script:
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~checkbox-
dev/checkbox/trunk/view/head:/scripts/cpu_offlining
This offlines CPU1, and then tries to grep for cpu1 in /proc/interrupts
for some reason that completely escapes me at the
Just to say, this is one of those issues where bailing out of a
situation early without restoring the state gets us in one big hole. The
script offlines a CPU, then bails out. When detecting any error
condition, code should try to restore back to the proper pre-test state
where possible, e.g.
Back to comment #1, offlining and already offlined CPU is giving you an
invalid argument error. Likewise, onlining and already onlined CPU will
do the same.
The semantics of the interface may have changed between releases, but I
don't think we should class this as a bug since these interfaces do
My intuition is telling me once we have the script fixed it won't be
offlining CPU1 and bailing out and hence we won't see this problem.
Lets get the script sorted out and then re-test.
Incidentally, the semantics of the /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/online
are such that offlining an already
@Brendan, ping me when you have some results, I will dig into this
deeper if we trip the problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926136
Title:
CPU1 on Dell PowerEdge M610, R715 and
Just for the record, I think the test script needs some more bullet-
proofing.
1. The echos to /sys/devices/system/cpu/$cpu_num/online should be
followed by checks afterwards to make sure EINVAL errors aren't returned
by the kernel. Just a simple bit of sanity checking can't harm.
2. It is
Public bug reported:
Installing today's ISO image, following the OEM installation guide
Install (OEM setup) in Ubuntu Desktop amd64 for Precise Pre-release on
a HP Mini 210 netbook, testcase:
http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Install/DesktopOem
On test case ID: uoi-003 End user selection I entered
I was able to close this error dialog box, and then I got the normal
login prompt and was able to login correctly.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988517
Title:
oem-config-remove-gtk:
Tried to reproduce on Dell6400, can't seem to easily reproduce this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988517
Title:
oem-config-remove-gtk: daemon died message
To manage notifications
Still cannot reproduce on HPMini210 after several more attempts. Looks
like a sporadic low occurrence bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988517
Title:
oem-config-remove-gtk: daemon
Can you edit /etc/default/grub and change:
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=quiet splash
to
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=quiet splash no_console_suspend
then run sudo update-grub and reboot.
Then change to a virtual console (e.g. press Ctrl-Alt-F1) and login.
Then run:
sudo pm-suspend
and see an
last line should have read:
and see if an oops message appears on the console, if it does, can you
take a photo...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987840
Title:
[HP-Pavilion-g6]
@Parameswaran, just to confirm, with no_console_suspend you are now
able to successfully suspend/resume from the destktop and using sudo
pm-suspend?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
@Brendan, can I get access to this machine so I can debug it further?
Also, we haven't got anything like powernap running during theses tests
have we?
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Colin King (colin-king)
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Colin King (colin-king)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987840
Title:
[HP-Pavilion-g6] hangs during suspend
To manage
** Summary changed:
- fwts: method test could give references to ACPI specifcation when it detects
non-compliant AML
+ fwts: method test could give references to ACPI specification when it detects
non-compliant AML
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Can you supply the ACPI dump when it gets stuck in a lower CPU frequency
state too? It does seem curious, but the faster CPU configuration
does not supply the _PSS in the tables, which is what was originally
limiting the CPU speed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
@JD Rogers, the relevant fix is in Oneiric, commit
3aeb86ea4cd15f728147a3bd5469a205ada8c767, so perhaps you are seeing
another related issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509180
** Changed in: fwts
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971886
Title:
QA: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-
@Stuart, I've been told that the ubs-linus branch of
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git contains some
patches that may be useful, so I'd like you to give this a spin. The
caveat is that this is the 3.4 kernel and I've not boot tested it, so
you mileage may vary..
I've put
@Anton, I'm finding this one hard to understand, the ACPI tables in your
machine have the _PSS defined as:
Name (_PSS, Package (0x02)
{
Package (0x06)
{
0x02BC, // 700 MHz
0x7918,
0x000A,
Well, since the ACPICA components are out of our control, but the rest
of of fwts is our code I'd personally opt for -Werror disabled for just
the ACPICA core.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
FWIW, -fno-strict-aliasing for the ACPICA core sources silences these
type punned warnings.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971886
Title:
QA: warning: dereferencing type-punned
Since Angelo mentioned USB power management, perhaps one could try the
following:
echo PCI_DEVICES_PM_ENABLE=false | sudo tee /etc/pm/config.d/pci_devices
sudo pm-powersave false
sudo pm-powersave true
and see if this changes the behaviour
--
You received this bug notification because you are
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Colin King (colin-king) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919815
Title:
Ubuntu freeze on battery after power on/off
What is the current state with this bug with Precise?
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871891
Title:
Resume
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Colin King (colin-king) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656745
Title:
notebook crashes on battery with particular wlan
@David, it would be useful to factor out all the pm-utils/power.d
scripts, so on AC power can you run:
sudo pm-powersave true
and see if the problem is triggered by this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Thanks Angelo, that factors out any stupid bugs that may have been
introduced by the Precise pm-utils.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969918
Title:
writing files fails on usb drives
I've submitted this patch to the mailing list to be applied for Precise
and as a SRU for Oneiric. For the Oneiric SRU I'd like it tested and
verified so that we can be 100% it does the trick, so can somebody test
this for us?
I've put the kernel .debs at:
Oneiric SRU Justification:
Impact:
commit 64b3db22c04586997ab4be46dd5a5b99f8a2d390 (2.6.39),
Remove use of unreliable FADT revision field caused a regression
for old P4 systems because now cst_control and other fields are
not reset to 0.
The effect is that acpi_processor_power_init will
verified on lucid 2.6.32-41.88 -proposed with ext2, ext3, ext4, xfs
lower file systems.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-lucid
** Tags added: verification-done-lucid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
verified on lucid 2.6.32-41.88 -proposed with ext2, ext3, ext4, xfs
lower file systems
** Tags removed: verification-needed-lucid
** Tags added: verification-done-lucid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
verified on oneiric 3.0.0-18.31 -proposed with ext2, ext3, ext4, xfs,
btrfs lower file systems.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-oneiric
** Tags added: verification-done-oneiric
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
@Adam, it was verified for 2.6.38-14.58, which was in proposed at the
time of testing. Check that you are using this kernel before filing a
new bug. Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
@Julian, I think I will let this bug pass over to a pulse audio expert.
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = David Henningsson (diwic)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Just to add my 2 cents worth, I'm concerned that there are a class of
green drives out there on the market where hdparm -B 255 is the only
way to ensure they don't excessively impact the Load_Cycle_Count, for
example:
WD20EADS, WD20EARS, WD15EADS, WD15EARS, WD10EADS, WD10EARS, WD8000AARS,
Public bug reported:
On a Dell E5420 I noticed the HDD is constantly spinning up/down. The
drive is a WDC2500BEVT-7 which is apparently a green WD HDD which has
firmware magic called Intelli-Park to park the HDD to save power..
Apparently the default settings it parks the heads after 8 seconds
I've filed a separate bug 969165 for the WD drives.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/952556
Title:
[Precise] [Hardware-killer] HD restarts every few seconds
To manage notifications
** Also affects: ubuntu-power-consumption
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904435
Title:
Excessive CPU/power usage after laptop resumes
To
verified on 2.6.38-14.58 -proposed with ext2, ext3, ext4, xfs, btrfs
lower file systems.
** Tags added: verification-done-natty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885744
Title:
verified on 2.6.38-14.58 -proposed with ext2, ext3, ext4, xfs, btrfs
lower file systems.
** Tags removed: verification-reverted-natty
** Tags added: verification-done-natty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
verified on 2.6.38-14.58 -proposed with ext2, ext3, ext4, xfs, btrfs
lower file systems.
** Tags added: verification-done-natty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947270
Title:
Tested and verified for 2.6.35-32.68 -proposed with ext2, ext3, ext4,
xfs and btrfs lower
** Tags added: verification-done-maverick
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745836
Title:
@Julian, I've been trying to reproduce this on a variety of machines but
as yet, no luck. Just so that we can factor out any kernel regressions
can you try a kernel from a previous release (e.g. Oneiric?) and see if
you can reproduce the bug?
--
You received this bug notification because you
On 26/03/12 21:30, Tony Espy wrote:
@Colin
I'm running 32-bit with the PAE kernel, so I can't install the amd64
debs. If you could spin me a PAE kernel, I can give it a try tomorrow.
@Tony, 32 bit-pae kernel now ready for your testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Photo DSC03081.JPG looks like we are jumping to
pcie_aspm_configure_common_clock + 0x25b which seems to be 0xd4b so I
suspect that is the BUG_ON(!pci_is_pcie(child)) statement below:
d4a: c3 retq
d4b: 0f 0b ud2a --
We've been working with upstream and we've got a patch that should be
tested. I've put some new kernel .debs in:
http://zinc.canonical.com/~cking/lp-961482
Can you please try these out and see if it works without the
pcie_aspm=force workaround and let us know if it helps.
By the way, kudos to
Thanks for the speedy response Hatem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961482
Title:
3.2.0-19 kernel fails to boot (-18 OK)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
For reference, the patch used to address this issue.
** Patch added:
0001-PCI-Allow-pcie_aspm-force-to-work-even-when-FADT-ind.patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/962038/+attachment/2940407/+files/0001-PCI-Allow-pcie_aspm-force-to-work-even-when-FADT-ind.patch
--
You
OK - so to make any real progress with the underlying issue we really
need a full trace of the crash, so I've spun a kernel that will dump out
the stack trace with some delays inserted to allow us to take a few
photos of the stack trace.
The debug kernel .debs can be found in:
Public bug reported:
While running a soak test I hit the following WARNING followed by a null
pointer de-reference on btrfs inside a virtual machine.
$ uname -a
Linux server-7362 3.2.0-17-virtual #27-Ubuntu SMP Fri Feb 24 15:57:57 UTC 2012
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
To repeat:
Start up a
** Attachment added: Test to exercise inode race conditions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965514/+attachment/2942296/+files/test.c
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965514
Title:
Just to add, this is repeatable each time. I've throughly exercised it
on different real H/W and not been able to trip it on H/W, just inside a
virtual machine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Can't easily able to run apport-collect on this virtualized instance.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965514
Title:
Still happens on Linux server-7362 3.2.0-20-virtual #32-Ubuntu SMP Thu
Mar 22 02:42:19 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965514
Title:
btrfs
I wonder if this is to do with a faulty BIOS frequency limit. To check
this out can you try the following:
Edit /etc/default/grub (you need to do this using root privilege) and
change
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=quiet splash
to
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=quiet splash processor.ignore_ppc=1
Hi, Just wanted to throw some analysis into this bug report. It's take
me ~30+ hours of running tests to gather this data, so apologies if this
comes late in the day once the fix has been committed :-/
I've measured Spin Start/Stop counts on a HP Mini netbook measuring the
start/stop count during
@Gema, did this get tested after all?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959286
Title:
EFI related kernel panic on reboot from alternate installer
To manage notifications about this bug
Hi Amber,
I've applied a patch that may help make passive cooling (CPU frequency
scaling) work better. It seems that CPU frequencies may not all be
scaled down together which could account for some overheating.
Can you download and install these kernel .debs and *NOT* apply the fan
control
@Marcello, did the above workaround help?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/856233
Title:
CPU frequency less than HW supported maximum
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Hi Tony,
I've applied a patch that may help make passive cooling (CPU frequency
scaling) work better. It seems that CPU frequencies may not all be
scaled down together which could account for some overheating.
Can you download and install the kernel .debs found in
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Colin King (colin-king)
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
For reference, kernel .debs at:
http://zinc.canonical.com/~cking/lp-962038/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/962038
Title:
ASPM doesn't work completely on Asus Zenbook (regression from
Tested Timo's package and my eventstat tool is showing ~2-5 events/sec
on an idle machine - this is a most excellent result - a huge
improvement! Thanks! :-)
Note: With a webbrowser running with some stupid flash animation it
averages ~20 events/sec and glxgears its ~60 wakeups/sec, but that's
Confirmed, a locked blank screen is generating 19-20 wakeups/second on
my idle machine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961202
Title:
A locked screen (blank screensaver) has compiz
@Swâmi,
I've tried to reproduce this on a few machines with no luck as yet.
Just to eliminate any misbehaving application that may be doing writes
(and possibly) causing this problem can you do the following:
sudo apt-get install fatrace
sudo apt-get install powertop-1.13
sudo power-usage-report
@Swâmi,
I'm suspecting it may be that Precise is doing less disk activity now
that we've worked on fixing a bunch of applications + daemons that were
causing a load of (frequent) unnecessary writes. I wonder if the
hdparm setting in /lib/hdparm/hdparm-functions when running battery is
too
in: hdparm (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Colin King (colin-king) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/952556
Title:
[Precise] [Hardware-killer] HD restarts every few seconds
To manage
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959286
Title:
EFI related kernel panic on reboot from alternate installer
To
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953205
Title:
System shuts down due to CPU temp exceeding critical thresh-hold
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951049
Title:
Lenovo T410 is overheating and shutting down
To manage
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955287
Title:
Ubuntu should handle hot CPUs by taking preemptive action and
@Daniel,
I'd like to get some processor related settings from your machine to see
what's going on. Can you do the following:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:colin-king/powermanagement
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get install intel-thermdump
sudo intel-thermdump thermdump.log
and attach the
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Colin King (colin-king)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959286
Title:
EFI related kernel panic on reboot from alternate
Hi there, thanks for verifying this with older kernels. I'd like you to
run the following:
sudo pm-powersave off
and see if the problem still exists
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Oops, my mistake, should be:
sudo pm-powersave false
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/952556
Title:
[Precise] [Hardware-killer] HD restarts every few seconds
To manage notifications
Checksum errors are due to the BIOS getting the checksum wrong or
possibly (very very rarely) the firmware data being corrupt. It's more
likely to be a BIOS bug. The original bug report reported that table
TCPA was producing the error - this is not a problem since the kernel
doesn't care about
I'd like to also know if you have got laptop-mode-tools installed or
not. Can you let me know. Thanks!
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Colin King (colin-king)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Gema,
As you requested on IRC, I've built the beta-1 kernel .ddeb (and their
associated .deb) packages, you can download them from here:
http://zinc.canonical.com/~cking/lp-959286/
Also, I've applied a couple of upstream patches to the current Precise
kernel, can you perhaps see if these fix the
Swâmi, what tools are you using to check for HDD start and load cycles?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/952556
Title:
[Precise] [Hardware-killer] HD restarts every few seconds
To
SRU justification for Lucid:
Impact:
The ECRYPTFS_NEW_FILE crypt_stat flag is set upon creation of a new
eCryptfs file. When the flag is set, eCryptfs reads directly from the
lower filesystem when bringing a page up to date. This means that no
offset translation (for the eCryptfs file metadata
+ SRU for Maverick too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745836
Title:
encrypted swap corrupts application stack/heap [was: soffice.bin
SIGSEGV cppu::throwException()]
To manage
@James, if you can email me the logs you get with tp-thermstat I can
still analyze them and spot any dubious looking fan control
characteristics.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955287
oops, made a typo, make the thermal parameter:
thermal.tzp=10
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955287
Title:
Ubuntu should handle hot CPUs by taking preemptive action and
warning
However, the kernel seems to emit an ACPI event when it detects the
CPU(s) are merely hot. I suggest we consider adding an acpi hook to
attempt to avoid a critical scenario.
In fact, I suspect the kernel *will* emit a critical thermal event, but
the temperature zips past this threshold and the
601 - 700 of 2173 matches
Mail list logo
