I haven't tested from Ubuntu proper -- I didn't realize at first about
the difference in code paths for Ubuntu derivatives. Since 'pretending'
to be Ubuntu for byobu purposes, and when I reported for System76 they
didn't see the issue on Ubuntu, I'd say that it probably doesn't happen
on Ubuntu
So I was able to verify that if ~/.byobu/prompt contains
export BYOBU_DISTRO=Ubuntu
[ -r /usr/share/byobu/profiles/bashrc ] && . /usr/share/byobu/profiles/bashrc
#byobu-prompt#
Then the problem goes ways. The issues appears to be in
/usr/share/byobu/profiles/bashrc, specifically:
The
Not an issue in 18.10 which I now use.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571915
Title:
Header cpu %'s don't match reality or per-process usage
To manage notifications about this bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 981792 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981792
Appears to be resolved in release I now use (18.10)
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 981792
friendly-recovery freezes by remounting partitions (only with cryptsetup)
--
You received this
** Also affects: byobu (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1809167
Title:
byobu-prompt color prompt corrupts long command lines
To
I've investigated this further by debugging through the startup process.
openvpn appears to be correct and systemd is doing exactly what it is
being told to do. Forks should fail after the limit. LimitNPROC=10 seems
like an arbitrary limit. Why have it at all or why 10. FWIW 30 seems to
be roughly
I've got an Ubuntu VPS that shows this behaviour if you're interested in
using it to investigate.
zb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1631104
Title:
The LimitNPROC line in
I admit that adding this new functionality sounds more like a feature request
than a bug. But as I understood it, LLVM/Clang claims to support GCC and its
libraries with a minimum version required.
No user would expect there to be an maximum version requirement.
I see two possible ways here for
Public bug reported:
1) Description: Ubuntu Trusty Tahr (development branch) Release:14.04
2) evolution:
Installed: 3.10.4-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 3.10.4-0ubuntu1
3) Evolution crashs when creating an IMAP Folder with SIGSEGV in
g_closure_invoke(), but the folder was successfuly created.
Public bug reported:
Release: 14.04 (Trusty Tahr, Development Branch)
Feb 27 18:42:35 sandbox kernel: [ 5421.250553] gjs-console[14933]: segfault at
0 ip 7fb9ac5d3704 sp 7d6d86c0 error 4 in
libmozjs-24.so.0.0.0[7fb9ac38d000+56f000]
Feb 27 17:34:26 sandbox whoopsie[1299]: message
Public bug reported:
Feb 27 21:46:08 sandbox signond[20705]:
../../../../src/signond/signondaemon.cpp 388 init Failed to SUID root. Secure
storage will not be available.
Feb 27 21:31:21 sandbox whoopsie[1299]: message repeated 4 times: [ online]
Feb 27 21:47:16 sandbox whoopsie[1299]: Parsing
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1280341
Title:
indicator-datetime-service crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
To manage notifications
This error occurs when you import empty calendar events (no name), e.g
by integrating an gmail calendar account
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1280341
Title:
+1
Checking on a Kubuntu 12.10 daily build VM the issue no longer exists. Same
applies to OpenSuse 12.1. Must be some kind of packaging problem I believe.
Same issues as above.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I found a solution!!! I saw Bug #966913 and saw that there were issues
if the directory/file weren't created/populated previously that things
are stored in a cache. Obviously not directly related but roused my
suspicions. Kmail used to have a similar problem that it didn't work
when first started
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42850044/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42850045/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42850046/ProcStatus.txt
** Attachment
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xfree86-driver-synaptics
Laptop: Vaio VGN-SR series
package version: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics (0.15.2-0ubuntu7)
Ubuntu release 8.10
The powerTOP application shows as the by far most consuming feature the
touchpad (see attached figure). This results
** Attachment added: print screen of powerTOP result
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24978297/powertop_scr
--
Touchpad driver consumming too much power
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357321
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
18 matches
Mail list logo
