[Bug 1934548] Re: RISC-V: Illegal instruction

2021-08-09 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
I am failing to reliably reproduce this issue. At first I have experienced this too. When I tried to bisect it and install multiple kernel abis they are all booting fine. So I was able to fail booting 1014 1015 1016 abis. And then they started to boot fine. I wonder if there is some

[Bug 1934548] Re: RISC-V: Illegal instruction

2021-08-06 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Package changed: ubuntu => linux-riscv-5.11 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934548 Title: RISC-V: Illegal instruction To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1939142] [NEW] linux-riscv-5.11 1015 panics on unmatched

2021-08-06 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Public bug reported: linux-riscv-5.11 1015 panics on unmatched [0.00] SBI specification v0.2 detected [0.00] SBI implementation ID=0x1 Version=0x9 [0.00] SBI v0.2 TIME extension detected [0.00] SBI v0.2 IPI extension detected [0.00] SBI v0.2 RFENCE

[Bug 1905807] Re: insecure W+X mapping

2021-08-06 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
insecure W+X mapping is fixed in v5.13 series and in impish. the changes to fix those will not be backported to hirsute, hence marking this bug as fix released. The kernel panics that is shown in the pastebin is unrelated to the insecure W+X mapping. ** Changed in: linux-riscv (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1932029] Re: Support builtin revoked certificates

2021-08-05 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Description changed: [Impact] Upstream linux kernel now supports configuring built-in revoked certificates for the .blacklist keyring. Add support in our kernel configuration to have built-in revoked certificates. Revoke UEFI amd64 & arm64 2012 signing certificate.

[Bug 1938886] Re: rrr:no dh_strip or strip loose setuid bit

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Patch removed: "chmod-reference.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1938886/+attachment/5515876/+files/chmod-reference.patch ** Patch added: "chmod-reference.patch"

[Bug 1938886] Re: rrr:no dh_strip or strip loose setuid bit

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Patch added: "chmod-reference.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1938886/+attachment/5515876/+files/chmod-reference.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1938886] Re: rrr:no dh_strip or strip loose setuid bit

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: dash (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: debugedit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New

[Bug 1915250] Re: buildd file owner/group for shared libraries

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
The cat trick does not preserve setuid when building with Rules- Requires-Root:no. Not sure why though. Either we need to fix for this to work with Rules-Requires-Root:no or bail out in such a scenario. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1938886] Re: rrr:no dh_strip or strip loose setuid bit

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Based on https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/fs/inode.c#L1928 it seems that setuid and capabilities will be stipped, thus currently our implementation of dh_strip causes to loose setuid and capabilities. No idea why this is working with fakeroot when Rules-Requires-Root is set to

[Bug 1938938] [NEW] apparmor denials for gnutls configuration

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Public bug reported: gnutls library can be configured using /etc/gnutls/config for example to allow small keys and TLS versions below v1.2 however, if application is confined and has an apparmor profile and uses gnutls it will ignore such file, if it is not allowed to read it. For example: [

[Bug 1938886] Re: rrr:no dh_strip or strip loose setuid bit

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
separately I'm not sure who/what/why stips setuid bits on file creation through redirect. is it like some kind of a CVE in bash/dash? kernel protection? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1938886] Re: rrr:no dh_strip or strip loose setuid bit

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
- objcopy/strip changed in 2.36.1, not keeping file attributes of the original file. Work around that in dh_strip to write to a temporary file and cat'ing this to the original file to keep the original attributes. which is broken for setuid files. ** Also affects: dash (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1938886] Re: rrr:no dh_strip or strip loose setuid bit

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
dh_strip does strip --remove-section=.comment --remove-section=.note --strip-unneeded -o /tmp/OdGxqpWWsW/stripeIrB_j debian/virtualbox/usr/lib/virtualbox/VBoxSDL.so cat '/tmp/OdGxqpWWsW/stripeIrB_j' > 'debian/virtualbox/usr/lib/virtualbox/VBoxSDL.so' which behaves differently under root and

[Bug 1938886] Re: rrr:no dh_strip or strip loose setuid bit

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
With debugedit v5.0 things are still the same https://launchpadlibrarian.net/551609214/buildlog_ubuntu-impish- amd64.virtualbox_6.1.26-dfsg-2ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz the setuid bit is lost. I guess we need to dig deeper into dh_strip activities, to see what/where/how it is lost. Maybe it is lost

[Bug 1938886] Re: rrr:no dh_strip or strip loose setuid bit

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
ls -latr debian/virtualbox/usr/lib/virtualbox/VBoxSDL -rwsr-sr-x 1 buildd buildd 406824 Aug 4 15:51 debian/virtualbox/usr/lib/virtualbox/VBoxSDL dh_strip --dbgsym-migration='virtualbox-dbg' ls -latr debian/virtualbox/usr/lib/virtualbox/VBoxSDL -rwxr-xr-x 1 buildd buildd 166208 Aug 4 15:52

[Bug 1928679] Re: Support importing mokx keys into revocation list from the mok table

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Xenial)

[Bug 1932029] Re: Support builtin revoked certificates

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal)

[Bug 1938886] [NEW] rrr:no dh_strip or strip loose setuid bit

2021-08-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Public bug reported: Over at https://launchpadlibrarian.net/550715513/buildlog_ubuntu- hirsute-amd64.virtualbox_6.1.22-dfsg-2~ubuntu1.21.04.2_BUILDING.txt.gz I have rebuilt an earlier version of virtualbox, that sets Rules- Requires-Root: no and added extra ls statements to find where/when/why

[Bug 1926937] Re: [SRU] Virtualbox new release 6.1.22

2021-07-29 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Note that focal's virtualbox is built correctly with correct permissions. So I wonder if something else is broken in hirsute that breaks permissions. I.e. dh_dwz srip or some such. We should monitor when the setuid gets dropped and by whom. However focal is now verified by kernel team, thus

[Bug 632041] Re: Provide commented-out method of using SFTP to upload to Ubuntu + PPAs

2021-07-29 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: dput (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632041 Title: Provide commented-out method of using SFTP to upload to Ubuntu +

[Bug 632041] Re: Provide commented-out method of using SFTP to upload to Ubuntu + PPAs

2021-07-29 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
`login = *` would work and ask ssh for the username. If a different launchpad nick is needed from the local address, one should then configure that in ~/.ssh/config which will then work for bzr, git, dput access to launchpad. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1932165] Re: lttng-modules/2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-28 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
lttng-modules 2.12.5-1ubuntu2~21.04.1 in hirsute-proposed unapproved queue -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932165 Title: lttng-modules/2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 ADT test failure with

[Bug 1937238] Re: systemd-time-wait-sync.service stuck in "activating" state after boot, blocks timers from starting

2021-07-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
But the things mentioned in systemd issue were supposedly resolved, and https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/d84af414180a4a8a7dd8772fc9d5302b5f9f28c9 is in focal already.. so is there something else not working in focal? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1937376] Re: u-boot in impish has unstable mac address

2021-07-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
unmatched images look fine. unleashed still fail to boot in CI lab, suspecting lack of stable mac address as well. Or something else. It seems like meta-sifive upstream have dropped all unleashed patches, but it seems like we are regressing in functionality. ** Changed in: u-boot (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1904802] Re: please provide firmware file for riscv64

2021-07-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
That's not enough. The json file I'm asking for in this bug report would not only load generic opensbi but would also load our location for uboot. A second json file would load opensbi and edk2 firmware with various options. See the json files that we provide on x86 and arm64, that not only

[Bug 1936255] Re: New upstream release 2021.07.14

2021-07-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
$ dpkg-query -W wireless-regdb wireless-regdb 2021.07.14-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 $ sudo iw reg set 00 $ sudo iw reg get global country 00: DFS-UNSET (2402 - 2472 @ 40), (N/A, 20), (N/A) (2457 - 2482 @ 20), (N/A, 20), (N/A), AUTO-BW, PASSIVE-SCAN (2474 - 2494 @ 20), (N/A, 20),

[Bug 1936255] Re: New upstream release 2021.07.14

2021-07-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
I wonder if we should really just do binary copies of it, just like we do with shim. If we set it to be compressed with xz. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936255 Title: New upstream

[Bug 1936255] Re: New upstream release 2021.07.14

2021-07-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
It's pure datafiles arch:all package without any runtime deps, thus it is safe to copy to -security as is. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936255 Title: New upstream release

[Bug 1937376] Re: u-boot in impish has unstable mac address

2021-07-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
New images look fine. ** Changed in: u-boot (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937376 Title: u-boot in impish has unstable mac address To

Re: [Bug 1923162] Re: riscv64 images fail to boot in qemu

2021-07-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021, 05:45 Brian Murray, <1923...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I'm sorry to be a bother here but I don't understand how u-boot failed > verification for hirsute but passed for focal when what are presumably > the same patches exist in both versions of the package. How could this >

[Bug 1926937] Re: [SRU] Virtualbox new release 6.1.22

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: virtualbox-hwe (Ubuntu Focal) Milestone: None => ubuntu-20.04.3 ** Changed in: virtualbox (Ubuntu Focal) Milestone: None => ubuntu-20.04.3 ** Changed in: virtualbox (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) ** Changed in: virtu

[Bug 1937376] Re: u-boot in impish has unstable mac address

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
whould be fixed by 2021.07+dfsg-0ubuntu2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937376 Title: u-boot in impish has unstable mac address To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1932159] Re: bcmwl/6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: Tim Gardner (timg-tpi) => Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932159 Title: bcmwl/6.30.223.271+bd

[Bug 1932160] Re: broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271-12 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: broadcom-sta (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: Tim Gardner (timg-tpi) => Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932160 Title: broadcom-sta/6.30.223.

[Bug 1932163] Re: evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu1~20.04.3 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: evdi (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Medium => Critical ** Changed in: evdi (Ubuntu Focal) Milestone: None => ubuntu-20.04.3 ** Changed in: evdi (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) -- You received this bug notification be

[Bug 1932165] Re: lttng-modules/2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: lttng-modules (Ubuntu Focal) Milestone: None => ubuntu-20.04.3 ** Changed in: lttng-modules (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: lttng-modules (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) -- You received

[Bug 1932169] Re: rtl8812au/4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu13~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: rtl8812au (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: Tim Gardner (timg-tpi) => Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932169 Title: rtl881

[Bug 1932173] Re: xtables-addons/3.9-1ubuntu0.2~20.04.1 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: xtables-addons (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: Tim Gardner (timg-tpi) => Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932173 Title: xtables-addons/

[Bug 1932159] Re: bcmwl/6.30.223.271+bdcom-0ubuntu7~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu Focal) Milestone: None => ubuntu-20.04.3 ** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1932160] Re: broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271-12 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: broadcom-sta (Ubuntu Focal) Milestone: None => ubuntu-20.04.3 ** Changed in: broadcom-sta (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1932169] Re: rtl8812au/4.3.8.12175.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu13~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: rtl8812au (Ubuntu Focal) Milestone: None => ubuntu-20.04.3 ** Changed in: rtl8812au (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1932173] Re: xtables-addons/3.9-1ubuntu0.2~20.04.1 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: xtables-addons (Ubuntu Focal) Milestone: None => ubuntu-20.04.3 ** Changed in: xtables-addons (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Medium => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1936640] Re: Download signed version from versioned URL

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
shim-signed 1.50 chainloads windows 10 correctly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936640 Title: Download signed version from versioned URL To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1937115] Re: Unable to boot/install Impish daily in UEFI boot mode

2021-07-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
The timing of the bug report matches the rebuild of cd-boot-images-amd64 against shim-signed 1.50 ** Also affects: cd-boot-images-amd64 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1927161] Re: dpkg-source: error: diff 'openssl/debian/patches/pr12272.patch' patches files multiple times; split the diff in multiple files or merge the hunks into a single one

2021-07-23 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
I am quite surprised by this behaviour. Especially since, `quilt push -a; debuild -S` works find, unpacks fine, applies fine etc. Quite a weird limitation imho. Do you think this warrants an upstream dpkg bug report? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1937376] Re: u-boot in impish has unstable mac address

2021-07-23 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Description changed: u-boot in impish has unstable mac address Somehow the board that is usually SiFive mac address range of 70:b3:d5:92:f4:40 has become a6:d4:5b:7a:a0:a7 Ideally mac address should be stable, and in the range from the manufacturer. + + 70:B3:D5:92:F0:00/36

[Bug 1937376] [NEW] u-boot in impish has unstable mac address

2021-07-23 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Public bug reported: u-boot in impish has unstable mac address Somehow the board that is usually SiFive mac address range of 70:b3:d5:92:f4:40 has become a6:d4:5b:7a:a0:a7 Ideally mac address should be stable, and in the range from the manufacturer. ** Affects: u-boot (Ubuntu) Importance:

[Bug 1937237] Re: last d-i publishing looks odd

2021-07-23 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
After removing the queue items. And building 20101020ubuntu629 it published correctly on all arches. All is good, and d-i can be removed fully now. ** Changed in: launchpad Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: debian-installer (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You

[Bug 1936871] Re: review-tools unsquashfs test fails on focal for a snap built on xenial

2021-07-22 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
We must not have broken squashfs-tools. So we should find what/when got changed or fixed and backport those fixes. ** Also affects: squashfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: squashfs-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New **

[Bug 1932163] Re: evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu1~20.04.3 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-22 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
1.9.1-1ubuntu4~21.04.1 supersedes 1.9.1-1ubuntu3~21.04.1 to fix adt failure on s390x. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932163 Title: evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu1~20.04.3 ADT test failure

[Bug 1932158] Re: backport-iwlwifi-dkms/8324-0ubuntu3~20.04.3 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-22 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
The proposed change fails in ADT in impish, please investigate https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/b/backport-iwlwifi-dkms ** Changed in: backport-iwlwifi-dkms (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Committed => Incomplete ** Changed in: backport-iwlwifi-dkms (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid =>

[Bug 1937237] Re: last d-i publishing looks odd

2021-07-22 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
i386 publication looks a lot better now. However, amd64 latest somehow published as empty. but the one before is fine http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/impish/main/installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu627/legacy-images/

[Bug 1932158] Re: backport-iwlwifi-dkms/8324-0ubuntu3~20.04.3 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-22 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
@vicamo sponsoring #15 to impish. Please apply the debdiff from here to impish packaging git. ** Patch added: "impish.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backport-iwlwifi-dkms/+bug/1932158/+attachment/5512861/+files/impish.diff -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1937237] Re: last d-i publishing looks odd

2021-07-22 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
I see that these uploads are broken: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/impish/+queue?queue_state=2_text=debian- installer Can AA please reject them? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937237

[Bug 1937237] [NEW] last d-i publishing looks odd

2021-07-22 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Public bug reported: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/impish/+upload/26439022/+files/debian- installer-images_20101020ubuntu628_amd64.tar.gz contents does not match what's unpacked in the archive, i.e. http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/impish/main/installer-

[Bug 1932158] Re: backport-iwlwifi-dkms/8324-0ubuntu3~20.04.3 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-22 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Changes in #15 are not suitable to go into Focal yet. As they should first be present in impish as well. Otherwise, whilst Focal switches to dkms package provider testing harness, the Impish package did not. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1932165] Re: lttng-modules/2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-21 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Please provide SRU paperwork as per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#SRU_Bug_Template -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932165 Title: lttng-modules/2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.2

[Bug 1932165] Re: lttng-modules/2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-21 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Attachment added: "lttng-modules_2.12.5-1ubuntu1~20.04.2_source.changes" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lttng-modules/+bug/1932165/+attachment/5512591/+files/lttng-modules_2.12.5-1ubuntu1~20.04.2_source.changes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1932165] Re: lttng-modules/2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-21 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Patch added: "corrected.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lttng-modules/+bug/1932165/+attachment/5512590/+files/corrected.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1932163] Re: evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu1~20.04.3 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-21 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
evdi debdiff is good, but it must go into other series too. https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/evdi Looks like that change is needed in impish, hirsute and focal. One cannot introduce brand new change in a focal SRU with a version number higher than all future series. ** Changed in: evdi

[Bug 1932163] Re: evdi/1.7.0+dfsg-1ubuntu1~20.04.3 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-21 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Sponsored evdi_1.9.1-1ubuntu4_source.changes to impish. ** Changed in: evdi (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed ** Changed in: evdi (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo (cascardo) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: linux-hwe-5.11 (Ubuntu) Status:

[Bug 1932165] Re: lttng-modules/2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-21 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Changelog entries in the #3 debdiff are in the wrong order. The 2.12.2-1ubuntu1~20.04* entreis should be just above the other 2.12.2 entries. Such that when build is done with -v2.12.5-1ubuntu1~20.04.2 all changelog entries since 2.12.2 are included, i.e. all the v2.12.5 from impish and etc.

[Bug 1926798] Re: package shim-signed 1.37~18.04.8+15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit statu

2021-07-21 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Fixed in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/2.02-2ubuntu8.23 [ Dimitri John Ledkov ] * Cherrypick 2.02+dfsg1-5 patch for x86-64: Treat R_X86_64_PLT32 as R_X86_64_PC32 to allow processing 2.04 grub modules built with newer binutils. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1926798] Re: package shim-signed 1.37~18.04.8+15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: installed shim-signed package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit statu

2021-07-21 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Fixed in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.32 [ Dimitri John Ledkov ] * Cherrypick 2.02+dfsg1-5 patch for x86-64: Treat R_X86_64_PLT32 as R_X86_64_PC32 to allow processing 2.04 grub modules built with newer binutils. ** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu

[Bug 1936857] Re: grub-install: error: efibootmgr: not found.

2021-07-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
in later releases grub-install has stopped forking to call efibootmgr in favor of using an EFI library. Does it return non-zero error code? because it should be ignoring failure to call efibootmgr. And otherwise grub installation was completed. efibootmgr recommends has been added back in

[Bug 1936948] Re: Dependency loop via sockets.target

2021-07-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
i.e. basic.target is too much there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936948 Title: Dependency loop via sockets.target To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1936948] Re: Dependency loop via sockets.target

2021-07-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
What the patch was supposed to do is to list Default Dependencies from https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.socket.html# But drop/negate shutdown related ones. Thus it should have been 1) Before= dependency on sockets.target 2) After= and Wants= dependency on sysinit.target

[Bug 1923162] Re: riscv64 images fail to boot in qemu

2021-07-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Oh https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/2021.01+dfsg-3ubuntu9.1 is an orphan, as it did not make it into impish. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923162 Title: riscv64 images

[Bug 1923162] Re: riscv64 images fail to boot in qemu

2021-07-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Impish is not affected, as it still skips fdtdir under qemu completely. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923162 Title: riscv64 images fail to boot in qemu To manage notifications

[Bug 1923162] Re: riscv64 images fail to boot in qemu

2021-07-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Trying to see if impish u-boot is also broken at the moment. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923162 Title: riscv64 images fail to boot in qemu To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1923162] Re: riscv64 images fail to boot in qemu

2021-07-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
$ dpkg-query -W u-boot-qemu u-boot-qemu 2021.01+dfsg-3ubuntu9.1 $ qemu-system-riscv64 -machine virt -nographic -m 2048 -smp 4 -bios /usr/lib/riscv64-linux-gnu/opensbi/generic/fw_jump.elf -kernel /usr/lib/u-boot/qemu-riscv64_smode/uboot.elf -device virtio-net- device,netdev=eth0 -netdev

[Bug 1934936] Re: package libwind0-heimdal 7.7.0+dfsg-2build1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libwind0-heimdal/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other

2021-07-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: heimdal (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934936 Title: package libwind0-heimdal 7.7.0+dfsg-2build1 failed to

[Bug 1934936] Re: package libwind0-heimdal 7.7.0+dfsg-2build1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libwind0-heimdal/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other

2021-07-16 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
In i386 build log I see Searching for duplicated docs in dependency libroken18-heimdal... symlinking changelog.Debian.gz in libwind0-heimdal to file in libroken18-heimdal I don't see something similar in adm64. As if the trimming of the changelog entries got done before doing symlinks,

[Bug 1934936] Re: package libwind0-heimdal 7.7.0+dfsg-2build1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libwind0-heimdal/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other

2021-07-16 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Is this debhelper or binary-package-mangler bug then? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934936 Title: package libwind0-heimdal 7.7.0+dfsg-2build1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to

[Bug 1936370] Re: u-boot-sifive does not upgrade u-boot on disk

2021-07-16 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
> The place to flash U-Boot SPL (sector 34) is hard coded in the boot ROM. I don't believe that is true. It is specified by GPT partition type UUID in FSBL, and it doesn't have to be at sector 34. As per sifive manuals. Furthermore I don't have access to read jumpers, thus I don't know if the

[Bug 1929854] Re: Vital and critical configuration files get overridden by system updates without warning

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
sshd_config is user modifyable and maintained. Some options can be changed using dpkg-reconfigure openssh-server but otherwise changes to it should be preserved. Can you please provide steps to reproduce changes to sshd_config getting lost? -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1929854] Re: Vital and critical configuration files get overridden by system updates without warning

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
/boot/grub/grub.cfg is a generated file that must not be modified by hand. Instead one is supposed to modify things like /etc/default/grub /etc/default/grub.d/* /etc/grub.d/* ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1933826] Re: default file permissions on bootloader configuration

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
we currently do chain grub.cfg from ESP to boot partition, can the password be set in that grub.cfg file instead? which today is outside of the scope of grub-mkconfig management. And that grub is protected with restrictive mount options of ESP, see /boot/efi/EFI/ubuntu/grub.cfg -- You received

[Bug 1922005] Re: added grub2 and grub2-signed to the lto-disabled list

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Also affects: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress --

[Bug 1935659] Re: grub2 FTBFS when built with libfuse3-dev

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Not sure it needs to do that. because I thought the tooling i.e. grub- mount is built out of src:grub2 not out of src:grub2-unsigned. And we don't copy back src:grub2. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1931595] Re: Compression type 0x3 not supported

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
grub2-signed and grub2-unsigned are source package names. You are searching for binary package names binary package name is grub-efi-amd64-signed ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1929860] Re: initrdfail can result in resuming with different initrd images and hanging resume

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929860 Title:

[Bug 1936370] Re: u-boot-sifive does not upgrade u-boot on disk

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: u-boot (Ubuntu Impish) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: u-boot (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936370

[Bug 1936370] Re: u-boot-sifive does not upgrade u-boot on disk

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
The attached implementation checks for what one has booted as. But does not check what was on the partitions before, or if they were used at all or not. I guess I could do: ``` $ sudo dtc -I dtb -O dts /dev/disk/by-partlabel/loader2 | dtc -I dts -O yaml | grep hifive-unleashed-a00

[Bug 1924850] Re: package usrmerge 24ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: installed usrmerge package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Also it is brand new installation of usrmerge package, and yet the system looks like usrmerged already, i think. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1924850 Title: package usrmerge

[Bug 1924850] Re: package usrmerge 24ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: installed usrmerge package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
@everyone Can you please also specify when and how you installed your systems? i.e. attach your /var/log/installer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1924850 Title: package usrmerge

[Bug 1924850] Re: package usrmerge 24ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: installed usrmerge package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
`Unpack base-files (11ubuntu18) on (11ubuntu14) ..` Looks very odd, because it is an upgrade between groovy-release and development version of hirsute, not the one we released. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1924850] Re: package usrmerge 24ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: installed usrmerge package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
@everyone Can each one of you please open a new bug reports, using `ubuntu-bug` tool with full apt output logs. Each error that happens may need unique solutions. Also I really need to know where from you are upgrading, and when/how the system was last installed. As that matters a lot for

[Bug 1936370] Re: u-boot-sifive does not upgrade u-boot on disk

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo systemctl is-system-running running ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ uname -a Linux ubuntu 5.11.0-1014-generic #14~20.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jul 1 13:56:47 UTC 2021 riscv64 riscv64 riscv64 GNU/Linux it came up fine. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1936370] Re: u-boot-sifive does not upgrade u-boot on disk

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
[10044.522610] reboot: Restarting� U-Boot SPL 2021.01+dfsg-4ubuntu3 (Jul 15 2021 - 12:01:50 +) Trying to boot from MMC1 U-Boot 2021.01+dfsg-4ubuntu3 (Jul 15 2021 - 12:01:50 +) all is good -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1936370] Re: u-boot-sifive does not upgrade u-boot on disk

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Testing out of ppa: $ sudo strings /dev/disk/by-partlabel/loader* | grep 202 | grep U-Boot U-Boot SPL 2021.01+dfsg-3ubuntu0~20.04.1 (Jun 25 2021 - 18:21:47 +) U-Boot 2021.01+dfsg-3ubuntu0~20.04.1 (Jun 25 2021 - 18:21:47 +) $ sudo apt install u-boot-sifive Preparing to unpack

[Bug 1936370] Re: u-boot-sifive does not upgrade u-boot on disk

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Description changed: [Impact] - * u-boot-sifive package currently does not upgrade bootloader on loader1/loader2 partitions. - - * there have now been bugs identified, meaning that upgrading u-boot is required to upgrade from v5.8 kernel to v5.11 (i.e. either in-focal, or from

[Bug 1936370] Re: u-boot-sifive does not upgrade u-boot on disk

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
NB! postinst must be executable ** Patch added: "impish.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/+bug/1936370/+attachment/5511152/+files/impish.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1936370] [NEW] u-boot-sifive does not upgrade u-boot on disk

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Public bug reported: [Impact] * u-boot-sifive package currently does not upgrade bootloader on loader1/loader2 partitions. * there have now been bugs identified, meaning that upgrading u-boot is required to upgrade from v5.8 kernel to v5.11 (i.e. either in-focal, or from focal to

[Bug 1932158] Re: backport-iwlwifi-dkms/8324-0ubuntu3~20.04.3 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dkms/+bug/1936344 to make dkms autopkgtest smarter. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932158 Title:

[Bug 1932158] Re: backport-iwlwifi-dkms/8324-0ubuntu3~20.04.3 ADT test failure with linux-hwe-5.11/5.11.0-20.21~20.04.1

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Building initial module for 5.4.0-77-generic Error! The /var/lib/dkms/backport-iwlwifi/8324/5.4.0-77-generic/aarch64/dkms.conf for module backport-iwlwifi includes a BUILD_EXCLUSIVE directive which does not match this kernel/arch. This indicates that it should not be built. Skipped. Processing

[Bug 1936344] [NEW] dkms autopkgtest needs to be smarter

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Public bug reported: Over at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backport-iwlwifi- dkms/+bug/1932158 you can observe that it was chosen to skip the dkms module for a given kernel, and dkms-autopkgtest did not manage to handle it well. ** Affects: dkms (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 1932542] Re: Add support for zstd

2021-07-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
(bionic-amd64)root@ottawa:/tmp# dpkg-query -W initramfs-tools liblz4-tool zstd initramfs-tools 0.130ubuntu3.13 liblz4-tool 0.0~r131-2ubuntu3.1 zstd1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1.2 (bionic-amd64)root@ottawa:/tmp# mkinitramfs -c zstd -o zstd-initrd.img 4.15.0-150-generic

[Bug 1912811] Re: Update dwarves-dfsg in focal to version 1.21 from hirsute

2021-07-14 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Description changed: [Impact] BTF is an extremely useful tool for BPF developers. Enabling BTF support in the HWE kernel requires pahole from dwarves-dfsg 1.21 or later, but in focal we have only 1.15. The simplest path for us to get a sufficiently updated version of pahole is to

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >