[Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info

2020-10-02 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: + [Impact] + The plugin conntrackd is renamed to conntrack. Added the following conntrack commands to the plugin. conntrack -L -o extended conntrack -S + + [Test Case] + + * Install sosreport + * sosreport -a will execise conntrack plugins if one of the

[Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info

2020-10-02 Thread Eric Desrochers
@hemanth @hillpd Could you work at producing a debdiff for g/f/b when your time permit ? I'll be happy to sponsor the patch. Regards, Eric ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Hemanth Nakkina (hemanth-n) ** Also affects: sosreport (Ubuntu Focal) Importa

[Bug 1892275] Re: [sync][sru] sos upstream 4.0

2020-10-02 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: In Progress => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1896222] Re: [sos4.0][sosclean] hostname doesn't get fully obfuscate inside a clean tarball.

2020-10-02 Thread Eric Desrochers
[VERIFICATION FOCAL] [PART 2] The above "host0" wording being the obfuscation host generated by sos clean. # /etc/sos/cleaner/default_mapping { "hostname_map": { "sosfocaltest": "host0" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1896222] Re: [sos4.0][sosclean] hostname doesn't get fully obfuscate inside a clean tarball.

2020-10-02 Thread Eric Desrochers
[VERIFICATION FOCAL] Tested with sosreport '4.0-1~ubuntu0.20.04.2'. sos clean is now performing hostname obfuscation in lvm2 plugin and process plugin. # ls sos_commands/lvm2 lvmdump_-d_.tmp.sos.hxvih1w4.sosreport-host0-2020-10-02-aurnwtz.sos_commands.lvm2.lvmdump #

[Bug 1898077] [NEW] [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info

2020-10-01 Thread Eric Desrochers
Public bug reported: The plugin conntrackd is renamed to conntrack. Added the following conntrack commands to the plugin. conntrack -L -o extended conntrack -S Closes: https://github.com/sosreport/sos/issues/2049 Origin:

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-10-01 Thread Eric Desrochers
Actually, I have marked the bug as verification-done too fast ... one item that I wanted to see is still missing. I'd like feedback on the 'natural' run that should happen on October 4 (sunday). I'll wait for your feedback. For now, I'll switch the LP back to verification-needed. - Eric

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-10-01 Thread Eric Desrochers
Took from my mdadm focal-proposed testbed: $ systemctl list-timers | grep -i mdcheck Sun 2020-10-04 04:47:32 UTC 2 days left n/a n/a mdcheck_start.timer mdcheck_start.service -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1896222] Re: [sos4.0][sosclean] hostname doesn't get fully obfuscate inside a clean tarball.

2020-09-30 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: [Impact] The 'lvmpdump' file is getting skipped due to the fact that the tarball name appears twice in the filepath, and we are currently splitting on the tarball name to get the filepath within the archive. The ps axo files being skipped is because it is

[Bug 1893109] Re: [plugin][ceph] collect ceph balancer and pr-autoscale status

2020-09-30 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893109 Title: [plugin][ceph] collect ceph balancer and pr-autoscale status

[Bug 1895757] Re: Terminal hangs running sudo when "use_pty" is set in /etc/sudoers

2020-09-30 Thread Eric Desrochers
[sts-sponsors] I have sponsored it in bionic. Thanks for your contribution Heitor - Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895757 Title: Terminal hangs running sudo when "us

[Bug 1893109] Re: [plugin][ceph] collect ceph balancer and pr-autoscale status

2020-09-30 Thread Eric Desrochers
@dan, could you fill the [Regression Potential] section ? I already completed the rest. I want to make sure I don't miss anything in the regression potential. I'd prefer if you can take 5 minutes to do it. - Eric ** Description changed: [Impact] + + https://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/rados

[Bug 1895757] Re: Terminal hangs running sudo when "use_pty" is set in /etc/sudoers

2020-09-30 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: [Impact] sudo commands can hang when IO logging is enabled [Description] When doing cleanup in pty_close(), sudo can leave file descriptors and events behind that would later cause poll() to wait on a "dead" pty. This can cause sudo to hang when IO logging

[Bug 1896222] Re: [sos4.0][sosclean] hostname doesn't get fully obfuscate inside a clean tarball.

2020-09-30 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: [Impact] - - [Test Case] - - [Regression Potential] - - [Other Info] - - [Original Description] The 'lvmpdump' file is getting skipped due to the fact that the tarball name appears twice in the filepath, and we are currently splitting on the tarball name to get

[Bug 1892275] Re: [sync][sru] sos upstream 4.0

2020-09-30 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: Eric Desrochers (slashd) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: Eric Desrochers (slashd) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-29 Thread Eric Desrochers
or directory # systemd-analyze verify /lib/systemd/system/mdcheck_continue.service mdcheck_continue.service: Command /usr/share/mdadm/mdcheck is not executable: No such file or directory [4.1-5ubuntu1.2] The "Command ... is not executable" error is now gone. - Eric -- You receive

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-29 Thread Eric Desrochers
Great thanks guys for your active participation. I checked this morning, and Richard's patch haven't been reviewed/approved nor merged yet upstream. Since this is esthetic and not a bug per see (until I'm proven wrong). Let's keep 'mdadm' in focal as is for now I guess. - Eric ** Tags removed

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
Uploaded in focal as well, waiting for SRU approval: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1_text=mdadm http://launchpadlibrarian.net/499706256/mdadm_4.1-5ubuntu1.1_4.1-5ubuntu1.2.diff.gz Please be ready to test again ;) - Eric -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
Extra space fix proposal: https://marc.info/?l=linux-raid=160130979927617=2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852747 Title: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file To

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: [Impact] The mdadm package is missing the mdcheck script. This has two consequences: In the immediate term, that means that we get failed systemd units on all of our physical machines (because they have mirrored disks) as we upgrade them to 20.04. This

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
Yup, I confirm, removing the spaces does the trick. My first ppa test went wrong for some reasons. With a new fresh ppa it went well. I'll submit the fix upstream, but will upload it now in groovy. - Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
I ran it locally with no space, and it did the trick. Maybe something went wrong with my PPA. Will give it another try with no spaces. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852747 Title:

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
Nothing wrong reported by 'systemd-analyze verify ' with regard to the 'offending' "Also=" directives. root@groovymdadm:/tmp/md/groovy/mdadm-4.1# systemd-analyze verify /lib/systemd/system/mdcheck_continue.timer /lib/systemd/system/plymouth-start.service:17: Unit configured to use

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
It's not an extra space issue, I have tested it. Still investigating, it seems like dh_installsystemd has a directive to look for unit file directive to detect potential looping issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
It's probably detecting a loop as explain in the above 'dh_installsystemd' I have cut/paste earlier. I'll need to review all this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852747 Title:

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
For some reasons, 'dh_installsystemd' doesn't like the "+Also= mdcheck_continue.timer" in mdcheck_start.timer. It builds fine without it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852747 Title:

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
Didn't work... dh_installsystemd -pmdadm mdcheck_start.timer mdcheck_continue.timer mdmonitor-oneshot.timer dh_installsystemd: error: Package 'mdadm' does not install unit ''. Still investigating ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
It could simply be a matter of ordering... - dh_installsystemd -pmdadm mdcheck_continue.timer mdcheck_start.timer mdmonitor-oneshot.timer + dh_installsystemd -pmdadm mdcheck_start.timer mdcheck_continue.timer mdmonitor-oneshot.timer Will try the following and see if my hypothesis is

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
the above was after applying commit "6636788a". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852747 Title: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file To manage notifications about

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
@legioner # build logs dh_installsystemd -pmdadm mdcheck_continue.timer mdcheck_start.timer mdmonitor-oneshot.timer dh_installsystemd: error: Package 'mdadm' does not install unit ''. make: *** [debian/rules:88: binary-arch] Error 25 dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary

[Bug 1865226] Re: gdm-smartcard pam config needs to be updated for Ubuntu and installed

2020-09-25 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: gdm3 (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Low => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1865226 Title: gdm-smartcard pam config needs to be updated for Ubuntu and installed

[Bug 1865226] Re: gdm-smartcard pam config needs to be updated for Ubuntu and installed

2020-09-25 Thread Eric Desrochers
It has been brought to my attention by a UA customer that they are suffering from which seems a similar situation: " Our only currently working SmartCard access from Linux, over SSSD, to AD, is on RHEL7. I was able to get SSH access on Ubuntu 20.04LTS, after adding "ad_gpo_access_control =

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-25 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: [Impact] The mdadm package is missing the mdcheck script. This has two consequences: In the immediate term, that means that we get failed systemd units on all of our physical machines (because they have mirrored disks) as we upgrade them to 20.04. This

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-25 Thread Eric Desrochers
@richard @legioner I'll wait to see if Richard's patches are adopted upstream and will re- upload beginning of next week, including "6636788a". - Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpa

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-24 Thread Eric Desrochers
* [PATCH 1/2] mdcheck: Prefix pause message with mdcheck https://marc.info/?l=linux-raid=160098735125487=2 * [PATCH 2/2] mdcheck: Set a tag of mdcheck https://marc.info/?l=linux-raid=160098735125488=2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-24 Thread Eric Desrochers
In case you want to submit a patch upstream https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Linux_Raid Linux RAID issues are discussed in the linux-raid mailing list to be found at http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-raid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-24 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Tags removed: sts-sponsors-slashd ** Tags added: seg sts ** Tags removed: eoan -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852747 Title: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-24 Thread Eric Desrochers
that there is no guarantee, and this could add extra delay for the package release. Regards, Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852747 Title: mdcheck_start.service trying to start

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-24 Thread Eric Desrochers
@sil2100, I totally agree with your statement. I was on the fence too (bug vs feature request) to introduce the script in LTSes but since the service and all are already introduced and implemented and the script was forgotten, it leave a message to the community that something is wrong or missing

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-24 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: [Impact] The mdadm package is missing the mdcheck script. This has two consequences: In the immediate term, that means that we get failed systemd units on all of our physical machines (because they have mirrored disks) as we upgrade them to 20.04. This

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-24 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: [Impact] The mdadm package is missing the mdcheck script. This has two consequences: In the immediate term, that means that we get failed systemd units on all of our physical machines (because they have mirrored disks) as we upgrade them to 20.04. This

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-24 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: [Impact] The mdadm package is missing the mdcheck script. This has two consequences: In the immediate term, that means that we get failed systemd units on all of our physical machines (because they have mirrored disks) as we upgrade them to 20.04. This

[Bug 1891296] Re: [plugin][snappy] Collect 'state.json' which may contain sensitive information (macaroons)

2020-09-24 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Adam Bell (arbell) ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-24 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852747 Title: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file To manage

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-24 Thread Eric Desrochers
[sts-sponsors] Uploaded in focal upload queue for SRU verification team approval before it start building in focal-proposed, entering the testing phase. - Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-24 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: - ## DRAFT ## - [Impact] The mdadm package is missing the mdcheck script. This has two consequences: In the immediate term, that means that we get failed systemd units on all of our physical machines (because they have mirrored disks) as we upgrade them

[Bug 1890846] Re: [plugin][rabbitmq] add output of: rabbitmqctl eval 'rabbit_diagnostics:maybe_stuck().'

2020-09-24 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890846 Title: [plugin][rabbitmq] add output of: rabbitmqctl eval

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-23 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: ## DRAFT ## [Impact] The mdadm package is missing the mdcheck script. This has two consequences: In the immediate term, that means that we get failed systemd units on all of our physical machines (because they have mirrored disks) as we upgrade them

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-23 Thread Eric Desrochers
/blkid.tab' initrd.files: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/boot/initrd.img-5.3.0-19-generic' ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Focal) As

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-23 Thread Eric Desrochers
[sts-sponsors] Uploaded in groovy. I'll SRU once the package lands in groovy-releases. Regards, Eric ** Tags added: sts-sponsors-slashd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852747 Title

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-23 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + The mdadm package is missing the mdcheck script. This has two + consequences: + + In the immediate term, that means that we get failed systemd units on + all of our physical machines (because they have mirrored disks) as we + upgrade them to 20.04. This

[Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-23 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Also affects: mdadm (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: mdadm (Ubuntu Bionic) Impo

[Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-23 Thread Eric Desrochers
I'll retry the test before we investigate further. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879980 Title: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded To manage

[Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-23 Thread Eric Desrochers
Autopkgtest failure found: autopkgtest for systemd/246.4-1ubuntu1: amd64: Regression ♻ , arm64: Pass, armhf: Pass, ppc64el: Pass, s390x: Ignored failure https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac

[Bug 1815632] Re: seeds update: remove from supported

2020-09-23 Thread Eric Desrochers
As long as it is still installed by default at installation time in order to prevent customers to have to install it manually as an extra steps, when needing support from us. - Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 1808475] Re: add arecord to soundcard plugin

2020-09-23 Thread Eric Desrochers
as 'incomplete' for now. - Eric ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1808475 Title: add arecord to soundcard plu

[Bug 1850953] Re: run plugins and compression with I/O idle class

2020-09-23 Thread Eric Desrochers
This bug is now part of the upstream 4.1 milestone; https://github.com/sosreport/sos/milestone/11 Will keep this case mark as 'triage' for now. - Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 1620654] Re: sosreport should have a kdump-tools plugin

2020-09-23 Thread Eric Desrochers
This is an old bug. Nowadays, sos has 'sos/report/plugins/kdump.py' I'll mark this bug as 'Fix Released' for now. If any features you are looking still missing, please report a bug upstream. - Eric ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You recei

[Bug 1804600] Re: apt plugin should ignore /etc/apt/auth.conf and remove username:password in url

2020-09-23 Thread Eric Desrochers
Fixed upstream in : https://github.com/sosreport/sos/commit/9dc6b75f76062315c58196c51ffe9d1319988520 First introduced in sos v3.7 Every Ubuntu stable releases have 3.9 and up. I'm marking this bug as 'Fix Released' - Eric ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress =>

[Bug 1896221] Re: [sos4.0] [clean] hostname doesn't get fully obfuscate inside a clean tarball.

2020-09-23 Thread Eric Desrochers
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1896222 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896222 ** Summary changed: - [clean] hostname doesn't get fully obfuscate inside a clean tarball. + [sos4.0] [clean] hostname doesn't get fully obfuscate inside a clean tarball. ** Tags added: seg sts ** This

[Bug 1891296] Re: [plugin][snappy] Collect 'state.json' which may contain sensitive information (macaroons)

2020-09-23 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Summary changed: - Please include snapd logs + [plugin][snappy] Collect 'state.json' which may contain sensitive information (macaroons) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891296

[Bug 1891296] Re: Please include snapd logs

2020-09-23 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Also affects: sosreport via https://github.com/sosreport/sos/issues/2241 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891296 Title: Please

[Bug 1873037] Re: autotalent plugin for audacity fails to load

2020-09-22 Thread Eric Chu
Note, since the bug was filed, I've changed my environment. Now running on Groovy Gorilla (20.10). I've re-installed both audacity and autotalent, and the plugin seems to be loading file. audacity: 2.4.2~dfsg0-3 amd64 autotalent: 0.2-6 amd64 -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-22 Thread Eric Desrochers
[sts-sponsors] Sponsored and uploaded into groovy. Let's now wait until the package lands in groovy-releases before proceeding with the SRU. Thanks mfo and gpiccoli for your contributions. - Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-22 Thread Eric Desrochers
@gpiccoli, Can you break down everything this debdiff does per file being modified in the d/changelog along with the summary you have already provided ? It would ease for future reference and make the d/changelog more accurate about the changes. * d/cryptsetup-initramfs.install: - *

[Bug 1890846] Re: [plugin][rabbitmq] add output of: rabbitmqctl eval 'rabbit_diagnostics:maybe_stuck().'

2020-09-21 Thread Eric Desrochers
It is now found in groovy-releases: --- sosreport (4.0-1ubuntu2) groovy; urgency=medium [Nicolas Bock] * d/p/0007-rabbitmq-add-10sec-timeout-to-call-to-maybestuck.patch: - Add 10 second timeout to call to `maybe_stuck()`. --- ** Description changed: [Impact] We have seen

[Bug 1891296] Re: Please include snapd logs

2020-09-21 Thread Eric Desrochers
@mvo, I have reported the request upstream: https://github.com/sosreport/sos/issues/2241 I'll work on it when my time permits. Regards, Eric ** Bug watch added: github.com/sosreport/sos/issues #2241 https://github.com/sosreport/sos/issues/2241 -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1891296] Re: Please include snapd logs

2020-09-21 Thread Eric Desrochers
/snapd/state.json' as suggested while not revealing sensitive information. - Eric [0] - https://github.com/sosreport/sos/blob/master/sos/report/plugins/snappy.py#L29 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

[Bug 1890846] Re: [plugin][rabbitmq] add output of: rabbitmqctl eval 'rabbit_diagnostics:maybe_stuck().'

2020-09-21 Thread Eric Desrochers
I'm pushing the commit into Groovy as we speak. ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890846 Title:

[Bug 1890846] Re: [plugin][rabbitmq] add output of: rabbitmqctl eval 'rabbit_diagnostics:maybe_stuck().'

2020-09-21 Thread Eric Desrochers
After a discussion between Nicolas and I, a new commit has been proposed to sosreport upstream: https://github.com/sosreport/sos/pull/2239/commits/5b5ebe2d2c9d579931c8d6a78101e16d6abfa527 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1891296] Re: Please include snapd logs

2020-09-21 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Tags added: seg sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891296 Title: Please include snapd logs To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1890846] Re: [plugin][rabbitmq] add output of: rabbitmqctl eval 'rabbit_diagnostics:maybe_stuck().'

2020-09-21 Thread Eric Desrochers
I'm pushing to commit into Groovy as we speak. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890846 Title: [plugin][rabbitmq] add output of: rabbitmqctl eval 'rabbit_diagnostics:maybe_stuck().'

[Bug 1893109] Re: [plugin][ceph] collect ceph balancer and pr-autoscale status

2020-09-18 Thread Eric Desrochers
@dan, @CJ Could you please file the SRU template before we can proceed with the SRU ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893109 Title: [plugin][ceph] collect ceph balancer and

[Bug 1890846] Re: [plugin][rabbitmq] add output of: rabbitmqctl eval 'rabbit_diagnostics:maybe_stuck().'

2020-09-18 Thread Eric Desrochers
@nicolas, Could you please file the SRU template before we can proceed with the SRU ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890846 Title: [plugin][rabbitmq] add output of: rabbitmqctl

[Bug 1890846] Re: [plugin][rabbitmq] add output of: rabbitmqctl eval 'rabbit_diagnostics:maybe_stuck().'

2020-09-18 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: [Impact] [Test Case] [Regression Potential] [Other Info] + + * Upstream commit: + https://github.com/sosreport/sos/commit/af5891786ff8c4e33c341fe9cca690fc77ac768f [Original Description] Extend the rabbitmq plugin to include the output of:

[Bug 1890846] Re: add output of: rabbitmqctl eval 'rabbit_diagnostics:maybe_stuck().'

2020-09-18 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Tags added: sts ** Summary changed: - add output of: rabbitmqctl eval 'rabbit_diagnostics:maybe_stuck().' + [plugin][rabbitmq] add output of: rabbitmqctl eval 'rabbit_diagnostics:maybe_stuck().' -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1893109] Re: [plugin][ceph] Backport - collect ceph balancer and pr-autoscale status

2020-09-18 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Summary changed: - Backport - collect ceph balancer and pr-autoscale status + [plugin][ceph] Backport - collect ceph balancer and pr-autoscale status ** Summary changed: - [plugin][ceph] Backport - collect ceph balancer and pr-autoscale status + [plugin][ceph] collect ceph balancer and

[Bug 1896222] Re: [sos4.0][sosclean] hostname doesn't get fully obfuscate inside a clean tarball.

2020-09-18 Thread Eric Desrochers
ntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Description changed: - The 'lvmpdump' file is getting skipped due to the fact that the tarball - name appears twice in the filepath, and we are

[Bug 1896222] Re: [sos4.0][clean] hostname doesn't get fully obfuscate inside a clean tarball.

2020-09-18 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Summary changed: - [clean] hostname doesn't get fully obfuscate inside a clean tarball. + [sos4.0][clean] hostname doesn't get fully obfuscate inside a clean tarball. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1893109] Re: Backport - collect ceph balancer and pr-autoscale status

2020-09-18 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Groovy) Assignee: Eric Desrochers (slashd) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Groovy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Hill (hillpd) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1890846] Re: add output of: rabbitmqctl eval 'rabbit_diagnostics:maybe_stuck().'

2020-09-18 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1893109] Re: Backport - collect ceph balancer and pr-autoscale status

2020-09-18 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Groovy) Assignee: Chris Johnston (cjohnston) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893109 Title: Backport - collect c

[Bug 1896222] [NEW] [clean] hostname doesn't get fully obfuscate inside a clean tarball.

2020-09-18 Thread Eric Desrochers
: sosreport (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: Eric Desrochers (slashd) Status: In Progress ** Affects: sosreport (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: sosreport (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Medium Assignee: Eric Desrochers (slashd

[Bug 1896221] [NEW] [clean] hostname doesn't get fully obfuscate inside a clean tarball.

2020-09-18 Thread Eric Desrochers
Public bug reported: The 'lvmpdump' file is getting skipped due to the fact that the tarball name appears twice in the filepath, and we are currently splitting on the tarball name to get the filepath within the archive. The ps axo files being skipped is because it is hitting our don't-match-

[Bug 1893109] Re: Backport - collect ceph balancer and pr-autoscale status

2020-09-17 Thread Eric Desrochers
@CJ, Could you produce a debdiff ? I'll sponsor it. ** Tags added: seg sts ** Also affects: sosreport (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sosreport (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sosreport (Ubuntu Focal)

[Bug 1892275] Re: [sync][sru] sos upstream 4.0

2020-09-16 Thread Eric Desrochers
" Users should review any resulting data and/or archives generated or processed by this utility for remaining sensitive content before being passed to a third party. " -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1892275] Re: [sync][sru] sos upstream 4.0

2020-09-16 Thread Eric Desrochers
t fit the description above. " - Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892275 Title: [sync][sru] sos upstream 4.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.lau

[Bug 1892275] Re: [sync][sru] sos upstream 4.0

2020-09-16 Thread Eric Desrochers
@arif, lvmdump obfuscation issue reported upstream: https://github.com/sosreport/sos/issues/2236 I personally don't consider this a major blocker for the actual release, because one still has to validate and check the content before passing it along to any 3rd party. - Eric ** Bug watch added

[Bug 1895546] [NEW] upgrade to 20.04 LTS crashes

2020-09-14 Thread QUINTON Eric
Public bug reported: Multiple upgrade tests fail, without explanation. I've found into the log files without research path. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:18.04.38 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-115.116-generic 4.15.18 Uname: Linux

[Bug 1892275] Re: [sync][sru] sos upstream 4.0

2020-09-09 Thread Eric Desrochers
in there. - Eric ** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892275 Title: [sync][sru] sos upstream 4.0 To manage

[Bug 1427600] Re: apport-unpack: ValueError: ['UserGroups'] has no binary content

2020-09-02 Thread Eric Desrochers
I'm having the same stack trace from groovy, when trying to unpack ii apport 2.20.11-0ubuntu45 all automatically generate crash reports for debugging ii apport-symptoms0.23 all symptom

[Bug 1427600] Re: apport-unpack: ValueError: ['UserGroups'] has no binary content

2020-09-02 Thread Eric Desrochers
$ lsb_release -cs bionic $ apport-unpack /var/tmp/_usr_bin_.0.crash /tmp/ Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/apport-unpack", line 74, in pr.extract_keys(f, bin_keys, dir) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/problem_report.py", line 270, in extract_keys [item for

[Bug 1879980] Re: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is broken/degraded

2020-09-02 Thread Eric Desrochers
[sts-sponsor] Sponsored in Focal/Bionic. Thanks for your contribution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879980 Title: Fail to boot with LUKS on top of RAID1 if the array is

[Bug 1820929] Re: netplan should consider adding more udev attribute for exact matching of failover 3-netdev interfaces

2020-09-02 Thread Eric Desrochers
[sts-sponsor] Sponsored in Bionic. Thanks for your contribution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1820929 Title: netplan should consider adding more udev attribute for exact matching

[Bug 1879987] Re: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't exist.

2020-09-02 Thread Eric Desrochers
[sts-sponsor] Sponsored in Focal/Bionic. Thanks for your contribution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1879987 Title: machine get stuck at boot if specified 'console=ttyS* ' doesn't

[Bug 1892242] Re: Curtin doesn't handle type:mount entries without 'path' element

2020-09-02 Thread Eric Desrochers
stion when we can expect this patched version of curtin inside standard package repo? " - Eric on behalf of an impacted user. ** Changed in: curtin (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: curtin (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You r

[Bug 1766230] Re: Strange window matching behaviour between Slack and Chrome

2020-08-31 Thread Eric Perret
I am seeing the same issue on 18.04.5 LTS -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766230 Title: Strange window matching behaviour between Slack and Chrome To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1888403] Re: sosreport plugins updates

2020-08-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1892275 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892275 sosreport 4.0-1~ubuntu0.20.04.1 (currently found in focal-proposed) will contain the above plugin update and more. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/4.0-1~ubuntu0.20.04.1 - Eric ** This bug

[Bug 1888854] Re: update ovs plugin

2020-08-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1892275 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892275 sosreport 4.0-1~ubuntu0.20.04.1 (currently found in focal-proposed) will contain the above plugin update and more. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/4.0-1~ubuntu0.20.04.1 - Eric ** This bug

[Bug 1892275] Re: [sync][sru] sos upstream 4.0

2020-08-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
[VERIFICATION FOCAL] [sos report (new main binary) / sosreport (former binary name)] Work as usual. It has been tested with simple.sh script, which runs various/several sos scenarios/arguments/...). [sos clean] Obfuscation works as expect. Take a bit of time to complete, but nothing

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >