[Bug 904853] [NEW] Does not display the file list for packages installed with --force-acrchitecture

2011-12-15 Thread Frederick Reeve
Public bug reported: I noticed this after installing Lightscribe on Ubuntu 11.10. Synaptic displays The list of installed files is only available for installed packages instead of the file list. The package is indeed installed and I have used it. To reproduce do the following: cd /tmp wget

[Bug 904853] Re: Does not display the file list for packages installed with --force-acrchitecture

2011-12-15 Thread Frederick Reeve
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904853 Title: Does not display the file list for packages installed with --force- acrchitecture To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 712384] Re: USB scanner doesn't work when connected to USB 3.0 port

2011-12-08 Thread Frederick Reeve
I have a canoscan LIDE 30 with the same problem. I connect it into a USB 3.0 port no go in a USB 2.0 port on the same machine it works. I can give you all the pertinent information if you need. This is also a problem in Oneiric with the default kernel. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)

[Bug 164254] Re: tzdata upgrade: /usr/sbin/tzconfig: No such file or directory

2008-04-01 Thread Frederick Reeve
Its back... Setting up tzdata (2008a-0ubuntu0.7.10) ... dpkg: error processing tzdata (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: tzdata E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Is there a quick work

[Bug 164254] Re: tzdata upgrade: /usr/sbin/tzconfig: No such file or directory

2008-04-01 Thread Frederick Reeve
I didn't figure out exactly what was causing it but its definitely because some one is using dash to do something dash doesn't do. I changed the interpreter from /bin/sh a link to dash to /bin/bash and now the world is happy again. So I answer my own question here the quick fix: Edit the first

[Bug 99437] Re: umount: mount disagrees with the fstab

2007-04-29 Thread Frederick Reeve
Chris: The message Cannot eject volume. is a separate issue and will not effect usage in any way. I take it you are using Nautilus to eject the volume. Nautilus eject does other things besides running umount on the device. Nautilus is using gvm and hence hal for various reasons. The problem

[Bug 99437] Re: umount: mount disagrees with the fstab

2007-04-27 Thread Frederick Reeve
JĂșlio: Thats true you may not want your mom to do that. In that case the simple way is since you have sudo just make a fstab entry for the drive using uuid and do not put in the user, users or group options. Then you can mount it using sudo and it can not be mounted by a standard user. The

[Bug 94848] Re: mounting via UUID behaves strange in kubuntu feisty

2007-04-27 Thread Frederick Reeve
It may also be noted that the options I gave above are only for preventing getting root access. If you want to protect data that diff. It also may not be desirable to let users mount the drive. Anyway enough said. You can go around in circles about this stuff. -- mounting via UUID behaves