Yes, with software-center is everything fine.
Thanks!
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Fix Released
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: New = Invalid
--
Cannot remove some default-installed applications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278040
You
Thanks to all!
--
gnome-utils appears as multiple applications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278169
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
As of ubuntu-desktop 1.172 (Karmic fully updated), nor gnome-pilot neither
gnome-pilot-conduits are dependency of ubuntu-desktop.
Can this bug be marked as Fix Released?
--
gnome-pilot shouldn't be a dependency of ubuntu-desktop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201676
You received this bug
Using software-center (in Karmic fully updated) I can remove both of them
without any problem, so I think that:
* this bug wasn't on ubuntu-desktop (because dependencies are always of
recommends type), rather on gnome-app-install;
and
* it can be marked as Fix Released.
--
some packages should
You've conviced me that cc-by-sa 2.5 is DFSG-nonfree, but the real
question is: is ubuntu following DFSG?
Back in the days of gobuntu, ubuntu was officially following FSF guidelins
rather than the DFSG.
And if I understand correctly, cc-by-sa 2.5 is considered free for non-sw work
by the FSF
** Attachment added: dmesg
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31086388/dmesg
--
[RS690] widescreen blinks to black
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31086451/Xorg.0.log
--
[RS690] widescreen blinks to black
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
I've tested your packet for a dozen of hours and I can now say that:
* flickering is almost gone (apart from those from the previous post, I've seen
no other flickering) for classic usage;
but
* flickering is much worse now using virtualbox (I use a windows xp with
virtualbox guest additions).
I'm testing your packet right now: expect a report in a couple of days.
--
[RS690] widescreen blinks to black
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Attachment added: dmesg
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31015751/dmesg
--
[RS690] widescreen blinks to black
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I've had a flicker just after upgrading and another after a restart.
I'll post another comment if other flickers will come.
--
[RS690] widescreen blinks to black
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31015766/Xorg.0.log
--
[RS690] widescreen blinks to black
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
My previous comment was too optimistic.
Can this bug be a duplicate of #374413?
--
[RS690] widescreen blinks to black
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Errata corrige: can be a duplicate of #397839?
--
[RS690] widescreen blinks to black
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
As of Jaunty, this bug is resolved.
** Changed in: tango-icon-theme (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
copyright file is poorly made
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139758
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Also affects: hundredpapercuts
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
gnome-utils appears as multiple applications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278169
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
** Also affects: hundredpapercuts
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Cannot remove some default-installed applications
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278040
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
I've added this to one hundred papercuts project since it's trivial,
impacts average user first-time experience and because solutions are
already given.
** Also affects: hundredpapercuts
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
gnome-pilot and ubuntu-desktop
Tell me if I've understood correctly: vrms should show me only packages
that I've installed from restricted or multiverse?
--
CC-by-sa reported as non-free
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144006
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
With karmic alpha3, problem is almost gone: flickering occours every two
hours or so.
--
[RS690] widescreen blinks to black
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
I've tryed to connect monitor and graphics via a DVI cable and problem
remains.
--
[RS690] widescreen blinks to black
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Problem doesn't occour with current xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd (1.2.4)
and older xserver-xorg-video-radeon (6.8.0).
--
[RS690] widescreen blinks to black
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374413
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26530123/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: LsHal.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26530124/LsHal.txt
** Attachment added: LsMod.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26530125/LsMod.txt
** Attachment added: LsPci.txt
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xorg
I have a LG M227WD widescreen monitor and an integrated ati X1250-based
graphics in my Gigabyte MA69GM-S2H motherboard; monitor and graphics are
connected through an HDMI cable.
Whem I am in ubuntu (9.04, fully updated) my monitor blinks to black
Sure:
* my machine is a desktop
* yes, it's the only connected monitor
* yes, but at 1920x1080 I am unable to see the two gnome bars
* yes, the bug remains event at 1920x1080
* the bug appears at every resolution that I have tested
--
[RS690] widescreen blinks to black
As of now (system fully upgraded), all is working right.
** Changed in: alsa-driver (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
E-MU 0202 USB audio interface doesn't work properly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327780
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I've tried pgquiles's ppa (alsa-driver 1.0.19): now I can hear again the
first song (and yes, again _only_ the first one).
** Changed in: alsa-driver (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: linux-meta = alsa-driver
--
E-MU 0202 USB audio interface doesn't work properly
As of now (again: system fully updated; linux-image-2.6.28-8-generic
2.6.28-8.24), nothing can be heard.
--
E-MU 0202 USB audio interface doesn't work properly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327780
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Status is still incomplete: how can I help you understand this bug
better (in order to change status and begin resolution)?
--
some packages should be recomended dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278187
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
As of now (with system fully updated; linux 2.6.28-8.22), I can hear
again the first song (as in my first post).
--
E-MU 0202 USB audio interface doesn't work properly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327780
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
As of now (with system fully updated), I cannot hear anything (even the
first song).
Plese, consider that:
* if I use my motherboard-integrated audio, it works just fine;
* if I use my E-MU under windows (same computer), it works just fine.
dmesg | tail continues to give me usb_set_interface
Public bug reported:
My E-MU 0202 can only play one song; after that, it doesn't play
anything unless I restart my system (after that, however, I can only
play another song an so on).
My card worked just right until three-four weeks ago, and stopped working after
a system update (I was running
Thanks for your time and for the links: --random-source=/dev/zero is
the stop-gap trick that I was searching.
--
shred is very slow
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279598
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: openoffice.org-impress
When I try to remove openoffice.org-draw from my system I also need to
remove openoffice.org-impress; this behaviour annoyes me, since I've
never ever used -draw (or even the related functionalities), but I
frequently use -impress
Have you finished researching?
I ask, at least, to remove the incomplete status: as of 8.10 (fully
updated) bug is still there, can be very easly verified by anyone and
have a nice and elegant explanation, so this is all but incomplete.
--
shred is very slow
I hope that this (very very trivial) patch is correctly formatted.
** Attachment added: incorrect-reference-in-copyright-file.patch
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20859301/incorrect-reference-in-copyright-file.patch
--
incorrect reference in copyright file
I agree: Jaunty _now_ have ufraw 0.14.1, so this bug can be closed.
** Changed in: ufraw (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
update ufraw to version 0.14.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300038
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ufraw
Pro:
* it's the latest version;
* it closes bug #228623;
* it's already available in debian experimental.
** Affects: ufraw (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
update ufraw to version 0.14.1
CC-by-sa is considered free for artistic content by the FSF, and the
packages listed as non-free by vrms contains icons et similia.
The meaning of vrms is indeed Virtual Richard Matthew Stallman, but
it lists packages considered non-free by Debian (that's because was
written by Debian developers
CC-by-sa it's free for ubuntu (there was a discussion on the
gobuntu-devel mailing list).
I know that vrms is a debian project, so that it's impossible for us
to send a patch upstream (unless debian itself decide that older
CC-by-sa licences are indeed free), but ubuntu can do and apply a
patch
Thank you for reviewing my bug report.
A temporary stop-gap fix might be to pick a single value from /dev/urandom and
use it for every write of the random pass, instead of picking a different value
for every write.
Of course, every random pass must pick it's own value to strengthen the process.
Public bug reported:
First of all, I'm referring to up-to-date Intrepid: ubuntu-desktop 1.121
and app-install-data 0.6.10.
Depends of ubuntu-desktop cannot be removed from ubuntu and are installed by
default by live-cd installer or update-manager; so, since gnome-app-install
cannot manipulate
On my system they're not installed because of gnome-desktop-environment
(I don't have it installed; in fact, I've never have it installed in all
of my installations of ubuntu), but only because of ubuntu-desktop.
gnome-utils and seahorse appears as applications in the list of
gnome-app-install,
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: coreutils
Random passes of shred are painfully slow: it takes me 571 seconds to make the
first (random) pass on a 2.0GiB flash device, while only 125 seconds where
needed to perform the second pass.
So, random passes are nearly _five_ times slower than
gnome-pilot isn't directly a dependency of ubuntu-desktop: ubuntu-
desktop depends on gnome-pilot-conduits that, in turns, depends on
gnome-pilot.
As of Intrepid, gnome-pilot-conduits was demoted from dependency to recomended
dependency in ubuntu-desktop, but PalmOS Devices cannot be removed
Public bug reported:
Some applications that should be removable using gnome-app-install (because
they're useless to me and _nothing_ depends on them), aren't.
They are (but I'm not sure that they're limited to):
1. Bluetooth Analyzer (bluez-gnome)
2. Evolution Mail and Calendar (evolution)
3.
** Description changed:
Some applications that should be removable using gnome-app-install (because
they're useless to me and _nothing_ depends on them), aren't.
They are (but I'm not sure that they're limited to):
1. Bluetooth Analyzer (bluez-gnome)
2. Evolution Mail and Calendar
I'm not sure what you're trying to say.
I wasn't trying to remove packages directly: I was trying to remove
application, instead.
However, I've already listed all the applications and packages that gave me
problems.
There is nothig that triggers this behaviour: If you install a fresh
copy of
I've found the source of the bug for the Pidgin Internet Messenger
application (pidgin package): pidgin and pidgin-otr are (recomended)
dependency of ubuntu-desktop; gnome-app-install fails to remove Pidgin
Internet Messenger because pidgin is a dependency of pidgin-otr.
I bet that we can fix the
Public bug reported:
Dictionary, Disk Usage Analyzer, Floppy Formatter and System Log are provided
by the same unbreakable and indivisible package (gnome-utils).
They all have the same description (they differ only in the name) and that
description enumerates all of them; since
Public bug reported:
gnome-utils and seahorse are dependencies of ubuntu-desktop, so they're
installed by default and cannot be removed using gnome-app-install.
Since they're useless to me, why don't make them only _recomended_ dependencies
(so that they're installed by default but can be
GNU FDL is DFSG free provided the invariant section clauses are not
used.
Yes, but e.g. autoconf-doc uses the FDL and is still list as non-free;
this is because, as long as I know, software from FSF uses the FDL
entirely (invariant sections included).
--
CC-by-sa reported as non-free
I also see autoconf-doc, gdb-doc, manpages-posix, manpages-posix-dev and
make-doc between non-free packages, is it right? It sounds strange.
Forgive me for the delay, please.
Well, vrms is a debian software, so even packages with the GNU FDL are
listed as non-free (such as autoconf-doc, for
On Nov 7, 2007 11:31 PM, LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The below (taken from the file), sure looks like a copyright notice and
license.
Copyright:
Copyright (C) 1996-2001 Internet Software Consortium.
Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any
purpose
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bind9
The copyright field is left empty and no license is specified in the
file.
** Affects: bind9 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
copyright file is incomplete
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150605
You received this bug
On 10/8/07, Mathias Gug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:22:34PM -, Gegio0 wrote:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: bind9
Which version of bind9 are you using ?
1:9.4.1-P1-3 (Gutsy Gibbon).
--
copyright file is incomplete
https://bugs.launchpad.net
On 10/8/07, Mathias Gug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
** Changed in: bind9 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
Status: New = Incomplete
What kind of informations do you need to complete the status of the bug?
--
copyright file is incomplete
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150605
You
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: usplash-theme-ubuntu
Other *buntus usplash-artwork package name follow the format distribution
name-artwork-usplash.
Only ubuntu's one differs.
** Affects: usplash-theme-ubuntu (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
package name
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tango-icon-theme-common
The copyright file for tango-icon-theme-common has the following flaws:
1. the copyright field is empty (usually is held by Canonical or by upstream
authors);
2. stock-icons/* is under LGPL (at line 21): but the folder doesn't
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tangerine-icon-theme
At line 25: The Human Icon Theme should be The Tangerine Icon Theme.
** Affects: tangerine-icon-theme (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
incorrect reference in copyright file
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: vrms
vrms reports packages under CC-by-sa (= 2.0) to be non-free; this packages are
(at least): human-icon-theme, tango-icon-theme and tangerine-icon-theme.
This packages doesn't meet DFSG, but since gobuntu (the ultra-ortodox flavor
of ubuntu) follow
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tango-icon-theme
The copyright file for tango-icon-theme has the following flaws:
1. the copyright field is empty (usually is held by Canonical or by upstream
authors);
2. the file doesn't meet the commonly used 80-chars line limit;
3. it isn't
vrms reports packages under CC-by-sa to be non-free; this packages are (at
least): human-icon-theme, tango-icon-theme and tangerine-icon-theme.
This packages doesn't meet DFSG, but since gobuntu (the ultra-ortodox branch
of ubuntu) follow FSF guidelines instead, I whink it's more appropriate to
63 matches
Mail list logo
