(In reply to Jan Horak from comment #130)
> [:gsvelto] are you willing to participate on the reviews?
I'd love to help but I'm not a peer of this part of our codebase so I
can't review patches for it. Reading Brian Smith's and Justin Dolske's
comments I think that we'd like to address bug 973
(In reply to David Webb from comment #111)
Does this sound reasonable?
Yes, it sounds like a good idea but also material for a follow-up. Let's
open a separate bug for that so that we don't make the patch here too
large or we'll never be done with it :)
--
You received this bug notification
(In reply to David Webb from comment #111)
Does this sound reasonable?
Yes, it sounds like a good idea but also material for a follow-up. Let's
open a separate bug for that so that we don't make the patch here too
large or we'll never be done with it :)
--
You received this bug notification
Created attachment 790711
Refreshed patch
(In reply to jhorak from comment #109)
Okay, it seems that we're moving in circles. Who's going to decide which
approach to choice? I can implement storing password to system keyrings but
I won't do this without clear statement from Mozilla what they
Created attachment 790711
Refreshed patch
(In reply to jhorak from comment #109)
Okay, it seems that we're moving in circles. Who's going to decide which
approach to choice? I can implement storing password to system keyrings but
I won't do this without clear statement from Mozilla what they
Created attachment 785385
Refreshed patch
This is a refreshed version of attachment 713868; the changes were
fairly minimal as noted in comment 91 and comment 92. Besides adjusting
a few rejections it was just a matter of importing nsIFile.h to get it
working.
I've done some light testing on my
(In reply to Brian Smith (:briansmith), was bsm...@mozilla.com (:bsmith) from
comment #95)
Shouldn't the users that care about protecting their passwords be using
full-disk encryption with a system password already? Why don't we just
remove the master password mechanism on Linux completely,
(In reply to Brian Smith (:briansmith), was bsm...@mozilla.com (:bsmith) from
comment #94)
1) I see in the patch that this is a build option that is off by default. I
would prefer it to be ON by default for all Linux desktop builds, and if
libsecret isn't available at runtime, then we just
Created attachment 785385
Refreshed patch
This is a refreshed version of attachment 713868; the changes were
fairly minimal as noted in comment 91 and comment 92. Besides adjusting
a few rejections it was just a matter of importing nsIFile.h to get it
working.
I've done some light testing on my
(In reply to Brian Smith (:briansmith), was bsm...@mozilla.com (:bsmith) from
comment #95)
Shouldn't the users that care about protecting their passwords be using
full-disk encryption with a system password already? Why don't we just
remove the master password mechanism on Linux completely,
(In reply to Brian Smith (:briansmith), was bsm...@mozilla.com (:bsmith) from
comment #94)
1) I see in the patch that this is a build option that is off by default. I
would prefer it to be ON by default for all Linux desktop builds, and if
libsecret isn't available at runtime, then we just
I think the idea of using the native keyring to store the master
password is sound. I'd be glad to try and implement it for gnome-keyring
once I've got some spare time on my hands.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I think the idea of using the native keyring to store the master
password is sound. I'd be glad to try and implement it for gnome-keyring
once I've got some spare time on my hands.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug
13 matches
Mail list logo
